(October 18, 2016 at 2:39 pm)Drich Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 1:50 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: I agree with Drich, the thought that I might have sex with someone one day and they might later convince the authorities I raped them even though I didn't haunts me.

That being said, I only ever read a couple of posts on the first page. What's this thread evolved into since then?

what always happens.. I take a hard stance against what people seem to think is way out there, we go back and fourth. the smart one's get what I am saying and drop out first, then the friends of the smart ones, then once things kind get explain away, some real/middle of the road people come out say or ask what is on their mind, then not so smart ones argue their "figurens" and can't get past something trivial, then the name calling, once they run out of stuff.. i am still stuck explaining level one definitions ad nausium to faith no more, till someone like you wants a recap of a weeks worth of dialog.

Let your goal be that people understand you, not that you understand yourself, and you'll be much happier for it.

(October 18, 2016 at 2:39 pm)Drich Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 1:50 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: I agree with Drich, the thought that I might have sex with someone one day and they might later convince the authorities I raped them even though I didn't haunts me.

That being said, I only ever read a couple of posts on the first page. What's this thread evolved into since then?

what always happens.. I take a hard stance against what people seem to think is way out there, we go back and fourth. the smart one's get what I am saying and drop out first, then the friends of the smart ones, then once things kind get explain away, some real/middle of the road people come out say or ask what is on their mind, then not so smart ones argue their "figurens" and can't get past something trivial, then the name calling, once they run out of stuff.. i am still stuck explaining level one definitions ad nausium to faith no more, till someone like you wants a recap of a weeks worth of dialog.

LOL, wow.  That is your perception of this thread?  There is reality, and then there is...wherever the you are, man.

(October 18, 2016 at 2:40 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 2:39 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: That doesn't matter. It's still relevant to the topic at hand.

You said in your post that fantasy is different from reality.  Drich isn't talking about the fantasy of forced sex, he's talking about the reality of it being okay.

Well, let's ask him.

Drich, do you think actual rape is okay, or are you rather talking about fantasy rape being okay, that is, consensual roleplay about rape, and that this too could potentially wrongly put people behind bars given certain sets of circumstances?


Please restate your actual position on this as clear and concise as possible. I'm not interested in a long debate about smth else, only in your position on this. Thank you.

(October 18, 2016 at 2:39 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 2:36 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: For the third time EP, he's not talking about a fetish fantasy play.

That doesn't matter. It's still relevant to the topic at hand.

Actually it's not relevant.

The actual topic is supposed to be about the SOL on rape in New York. It's not supposed to be about fantasies. It's not supposed to be about grossly misinterpreting the law. It's not supposed to be about whatever it is that drippy has dreamed up in his pea-sized brain. It's not supposed to be about trivializing one's experience with being raped and telling them that "well, if you didn't report it in the specified time frame, then it's not rape and you are lying to get attention." Yeah.. he's pretty much said that. And in all actuality, he didn't even bother to ask me what state it happened to me in. It sure as hell wasn't NY. It was Maryland. And in Maryland, there is no SOL, as indicated by my lengthy post earlier today. But you know... why bother reading facts and laws when one can just conjure up bullshit in their head and try to pass that off as a law.

So if you want to agree with him on those fronts, have at it. But if you know there is an overwhelming difference between the reality of being raped and role playing using rough sex, that is consensual between two people, then we can move on because that is NOT the topic here and it is NOT relevant to this discussion.

(October 18, 2016 at 2:44 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 2:40 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: You said in your post that fantasy is different from reality.  Drich isn't talking about the fantasy of forced sex, he's talking about the reality of it being okay.

Well, let's ask him.

Drich, do you think actual rape is okay, or are you rather talking about fantasy rape being okay, that is, consensual roleplay about rape, and that this too could potentially wrongly put people behind bars given certain sets of circumstances?


Please restate your actual position on this as clear and concise as possible. I'm not interested in a long debate about smth else, only in your position on this. Thank you.

Drich has already said that rape is wrong.  It's what he calls 'rape' that's the issue here.  

Which has been demonstrated over the pages of this thread.

(October 18, 2016 at 12:29 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 12:03 pm)Drich Wrote: The point being forced sex is not always rape.

Go fuck yourself again, Drich.

Less lube though.  Don't worry it won't be rape unless they catch you.  Even god can't judge you; if it can't be prosecuted His hands are tied.

(October 18, 2016 at 2:44 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 2:40 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: You said in your post that fantasy is different from reality.  Drich isn't talking about the fantasy of forced sex, he's talking about the reality of it being okay.

Well, let's ask him.

Drich, do you think actual rape is okay, or are you rather talking about fantasy rape being okay, that is, consensual roleplay about rape, and that this too could potentially wrongly put people behind bars given certain sets of circumstances?


Please restate your actual position on this as clear and concise as possible. I'm not interested in a long debate about smth else, only in your position on this. Thank you.

How about putting that in it's own thread and not on this one? I mean, shit, it's perfectly fine to discuss one's like or dislike towards rape, but how does that fall in line with the SOL argument that is supposed to be made here?

(October 18, 2016 at 2:45 pm)Nymphadora Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 2:39 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: That doesn't matter. It's still relevant to the topic at hand.

Actually it's not relevant.

The actual topic is supposed to be about the SOL on rape in New York. It's not supposed to be about fantasies. It's not supposed to be about grossly misinterpreting the law. It's not supposed to be about whatever it is that drippy has dreamed up in his pea-sized brain. It's not supposed to be about trivializing one's experience with being raped and telling them that "well, if you didn't report it in the specified time frame, then it's not rape and you are lying to get attention." Yeah.. he's pretty much said that.

So if you want to agree with him on those fronts, have at it. But if you know there is an overwhelming difference between the reality of being raped and role playing using rough sex, that is consensual between two people, then we can move on because that is NOT the topic here and it is NOT relevant to this discussion.

You don't decide what's relevant to the topic, I'm sorry to say.

(October 18, 2016 at 2:49 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 2:45 pm)Nymphadora Wrote: Actually it's not relevant.

The actual topic is supposed to be about the SOL on rape in New York. It's not supposed to be about fantasies. It's not supposed to be about grossly misinterpreting the law. It's not supposed to be about whatever it is that drippy has dreamed up in his pea-sized brain. It's not supposed to be about trivializing one's experience with being raped and telling them that "well, if you didn't report it in the specified time frame, then it's not rape and you are lying to get attention." Yeah.. he's pretty much said that.

So if you want to agree with him on those fronts, have at it. But if you know there is an overwhelming difference between the reality of being raped and role playing using rough sex, that is consensual between two people, then we can move on because that is NOT the topic here and it is NOT relevant to this discussion.

You don't decide what's relevant to the topic, I'm sorry to say.

And you do?

(October 18, 2016 at 2:49 pm)Nymphadora Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 2:44 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: Well, let's ask him.

Drich, do you think actual rape is okay, or are you rather talking about fantasy rape being okay, that is, consensual roleplay about rape, and that this too could potentially wrongly put people behind bars given certain sets of circumstances?


Please restate your actual position on this as clear and concise as possible. I'm not interested in a long debate about smth else, only in your position on this. Thank you.

How about putting that in it's own thread and not on this one? I mean, shit, it's perfectly fine to discuss one's like or dislike towards rape, but how does that fall in line with the SOL argument that is supposed to be made here?

How about mind your own business and stop telling me what to do?