(October 31, 2016 at 2:27 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Which is evidence for..?

It seems to support the highly controversial notion that steel fails under heat.

Who'da thunk it?

(November 2, 2016 at 12:40 pm)goombah111 Wrote: FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is very reputable in my opinion.

That's nice. But how come YOU are still the conspiracy nut-job?

(November 2, 2016 at 12:40 pm)goombah111 Wrote: your blind faith is in the people you choose to agree with.

No. I have respect for opinions of experts; you know - people, who know about stuff, as opposed to uneducated idiots, who reckon they figured out how the world works, because they binge-watched X-Files while getting high. That's why we have people who study particular fields and debunk nonsense - so that I don't have to personally go through every piece of sh*t some intoxicated moron threw up on the internet.

(November 2, 2016 at 12:40 pm)goombah111 Wrote: have you ever came up with any of your own conclusions? 

Sure. "You're a dipsh*t" is one I'm particularly proud of...

(November 2, 2016 at 12:40 pm)goombah111 Wrote: at least SoF**kingHigh has his own original thoughts and ideas. 
at least theres something to respect.

Yes. He has marginally more patience for fools, like you.

(November 2, 2016 at 12:55 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote: No. I have respect for opinions of experts; you know - people, who know about stuff, as opposed to uneducated idiots, who reckon they figured out how the world works, because they binge-watched X-Files while getting high. That's why we have people who study particular fields and debunk nonsense - so that I don't have to personally go through every piece of sh*t some intoxicated moron threw up on the internet.

okay, so you respect the opinions of those 2700+ architects and engineers as well as the expert witnesses.

correct?

youre a walking contradiction.

you have no idea what you are talking about, and im sure your response will be a childish insult.

thats what ignorant people resort to. youre used to dealing with theists, you had it easy until now.

(October 31, 2016 at 2:58 pm)goombah111 Wrote: i presented my argument for controlled demolition.

No. You presented evidence that that steel was subjected to high temperatures for a considerable period of time.

Now, since you're begging for cross-examination, let's do that.

1) How might the government wire one, two, or three buildings with thousands upon thousands of people in them, at all hours, for demolition, when that process takes weeks to do for buildings that size -- and not have one single person notice it?

2) Who performed this wiring? What company, agency, or unit?

3) You'd like people to believe that the government has gotten what must be at a minimum hundreds and maximum thousands of workers to hold absolute silence for a decade-and-a-half. How do you think it could manage such a program? Does that seem realistic to you?

That'll do for now. Over to you.

(November 2, 2016 at 1:01 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(October 31, 2016 at 2:58 pm)goombah111 Wrote: i presented my argument for controlled demolition.

No. You presented evidence that that steel was subjected to high temperatures for a considerable period of time.

Now, since you're begging for cross-examination, let's do that.

1) How might the government wire one, two, or three buildings with thousands upon thousands of people in them, at all hours, for demolition, when that process takes weeks to do for buildings that size -- and not have one single person notice it?

2) Who performed this wiring? What company, agency, or unit?

3) You'd like people to believe that the government has gotten what must be at a minimum hundreds and maximum thousands of workers to hold absolute silence for a decade-and-a-half. How do you think it could manage such a program? Does that seem realistic to you?

That'll do for now. Over to you.

this isnt a trial, its a debate.

present your evidence. speculation and hypotheses arent evidence.

you wouldnt win a court case with those questions either, i hope you arent a law student.

here. 200+ eye witness accounts and news broadcasts.


go ahead and cross examine them

(November 2, 2016 at 1:05 pm)goombah111 Wrote:

(November 2, 2016 at 1:01 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: No. You presented evidence that that steel was subjected to high temperatures for a considerable period of time.

Now, since you're begging for cross-examination, let's do that.

1) How might the government wire one, two, or three buildings with thousands upon thousands of people in them, at all hours, for demolition, when that process takes weeks to do for buildings that size -- and not have one single person notice it?

2) Who performed this wiring? What company, agency, or unit?

3) You'd like people to believe that the government has gotten what must be at a minimum hundreds and maximum thousands of workers to hold absolute silence for a decade-and-a-half. How do you think it could manage such a program? Does that seem realistic to you?

That'll do for now. Over to you.

this isnt a trial, its a debate.

You yourself used that term. Here it is in black-and-white:

(October 31, 2016 at 2:50 pm)goombah111 Wrote:  you can agree and we move on, or you can disagree and present your counter argument or "cross examination"

(November 2, 2016 at 1:05 pm)goombah111 Wrote: present your evidence. speculation and hypotheses arent evidence.

I haven't made a claim. I'm asking you to support yours ... just as you invited. You asked for cross-examination. Don't get surly now because you're getting it.

(November 2, 2016 at 1:05 pm)goombah111 Wrote: you wouldnt win a court case with those questions either, i hope you arent a law student.

Personal attacks are the surest sign of a vapid argument.

(November 2, 2016 at 1:05 pm)goombah111 Wrote: here. 200+ eye witness accounts and news broadcasts.

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH1Xdcssw4A

---

go ahead and cross examine them

No. You're here, you asked to have your beliefs examined and questioned, and now you're getting butthurt because that's what's happening.

Answer my questions. Quit dodging.

ETA: I'll tell you this now ... I make change in the coin tendered.

ETA2: Just to let you know, changing someone's words in one of their quotes without acknowledging that change is, if I'm not mistaken, against the rules. I'm not going to report that, but in the future, please note where you edit my words. I don't want anyone getting the wrong impression based on your unnoted edits. Thanks.

(November 2, 2016 at 1:00 pm)goombah111 Wrote: okay, so you respect the opinions of those 2700+ architects and engineers as well as the expert witnesses.

correct?

LOL... You truly are a simpleton. Tell me, junior - how many architects and engineers do you think there are in the world? And consequently - what percentage of that would your (questionable anyway) number be? Like 0.1% at the most? There are easily as many dumb-ass architects and engineers, even if the people you are talking about actually exist, are who you say they are and say what you claim they say. All of which I doubt.

(November 2, 2016 at 1:00 pm)goombah111 Wrote: youre a walking contradiction.

How do you know I'm not in a wheel-chair? That could have been very hurtful.

(November 2, 2016 at 1:00 pm)goombah111 Wrote: you have no idea what you are talking about, and im sure your response will be a childish insult.

Ooooh, I see you're beginning to catch on. Bravo, sir.

...You utter muppet.

(November 2, 2016 at 1:00 pm)goombah111 Wrote: thats what ignorant people resort to. youre used to dealing with theists, you had it easy until now.

Seemed pretty easy so far. You're just a wack-job, who believes copy-pasta off the internet. I don't need to prove anything to you.

my posts keep getting messed up. idk why. 
200+ eye witness testimonies for secondary explosions. fire fighters, law enforcement, civilians, news reporters. and news broadcasts reporting Secondary Explosions.
opinion on why this is? please.
and if you agree secondary explosions occured, 
do you see any implications that might stem from the introduction of this evidence?

---

(November 2, 2016 at 1:01 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: EDITED BY GOOMBAH111
That'll do for now. Over to you.

(November 2, 2016 at 12:40 pm)goombah111 Wrote: i could show you a video of bush planting the bombs and saying "im blowing up the world trade"

Bush couldn't even open a fucking door:





and fell off the famously untippagle Segway:



Hand him a bomb and within a minute there'd be nothing left besides a crater and smoke coming out of a pair of Nikes.

(November 2, 2016 at 2:47 pm)Stimbo Wrote:

(November 2, 2016 at 12:40 pm)goombah111 Wrote: i could show you a video of bush planting the bombs and saying "im blowing up the world trade"

Bush couldn't even open a fucking door:

and fell off the famously untippagle Segway:


Hand him a bomb and within a minute there'd be nothing left besides a crater and smoke coming out of a pair of Nikes.

EDITED PICTURES TO SAVE SPACE (is that okay?) signed Goombah111

ah, the evil mastermind at work.