Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 3, 2016 at 10:45 pm
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2016 at 12:42 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
NOTE [1]: No opinion, faith, emotion, nor bias was used in this thread.
NOTE [2]: I am of course atheistic, (I have zero beliefs). The sequences while not novel, are combined in novel ways, such that the PROBABILITY of non-omniscient Gods/Creators is reported.
As such, one needs not belief/faith/certainty to observe PROBABILITIES.
WARNING: Some statistics/words occur in UPPER CASE FORM or various colours, because reading all lower case/uniform colour is simply quite tiresome.
![[Image: sOf7VSh.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FsOf7VSh.png)
God is PROBABLY quite real. (however, not the omniscient, all powerful kind seen in religion)
We are simulating more and more detailed universes (Example 'illustris') as computing power increases, and creating more and more sophisticated artificial intelligence.
If this computing increase doesn’t end (ie we aren’t all wiped out) our simulations will eventually get detailed enough to contain INTELLIGENCE or create artificial intelligence. that exceeds humans on all tasks (God-like software).
Then, (probably when we are a still a mortal species, having not yet solved ageing…) we BECOME GODS, however NOT the OMNISCIENT, OMNIPOTENT God specified in religion.
In the same way, it is likely that THE VERY UNIVERSE WE OCCUPY may have come about, and thus likewise, God (it’s creator(s)) is non-omnipotent, non-infinite etc.
PROBABLE NON-OMNISCIENT GODS
**(1)** Man-made 'General Artificial intelligence' (The brain based software we invent [that shall exceed humans in all tasks, not merely individual tasks as they do now]). [Eg Google Deepmind's atari q or alpha go]
**(2)** Intelligence that EVOLVES in our own simulations to become God-like (ie they create universes, or ‘general artificial intelligence’-like programs).
**(3)** The non-omnipotent, non-infinite Gods (human like?) that created our universe stemming from the same way that we simulate more and more detailed universes via **(4)** — constrained paths. (eg illustris)
**(4)** Mankind; for mankind shall perhaps promptly possess God bound capabilities, via **(1)** and **(2)**.
SCIENTIFIC-STATISTICS PAR PROBABLE NON-OMNISCIENT GODS
In SUMMARY, probabilistically, the ability to generate artificial intelligence, that surpasses the net intellect of one’s species, AND OR compute simulation of universes (with intellect resembling prior), IS THAT WHICH classifies said species as God-bound.
INTRODUCTION [A-B]:
['A'] What data purports that SUPER-human ARTIFICIAL INTELLECT [Seen in **(1)** prior] is possible?
The human brain operates at roughly 10¹⁵ floating point operations per second.
NON-TRIVIALLY ACCESSIBLE super-computing platforms already exist, such that this operation cycle is attained.
TRIVIALLY ACCESSIBLE resources shall exist at 2020’s horizon, in tandem with KURZWEIL’S LAW OF ACCELERATING RETURNS, (and perhaps MOORE’S LAW/modern Moore’s law variants).
['B'] What data purports that SIMULATIONS [Seen in **(2)** prior] ARE possible?
Our universe is at least linear scale [Dirac], AND at most exponential order [inflation].
Therein, a simulation of such shall require an exponential order capable machine.
Exponential order capable machines exist today.
These are called quantum computers. (See Dwave)
These quantum computers, though superior, are not yet sufficient to encode detailed universes (that contain intelligence).
However, VIA non-exponential machines (super-computers), THERE EXISTS QUITE DETAILED simulations of our universe. (see illustris)
CONCLUSION [C-D]:
Artificial intelligence, together with quantum computers, are enhancing in concurrence with measures such as KURZWEIL’S LAW OF ACCELERATING RETURNS.
Particularly, from these MEASURES, super-human Ai is PERHAPS INEVITABLE, and such shall therein PROBABLY occur within the scope-of 20-40 years. (See Nick Bostrom's super intelligence)
At this juncture, mankind shall maintain non-omniscience/non-omnipotence (Ageing yet solved, Energy issues persist et cetera).
[C] What data purports that SIMULATIONS [Seen in **(4)** prior] ARE possible?
Thereafter, man becomes non-omniscient, non-omnipotent Gods, having created super-human artificial intelligence, therein **(4)** is probable.
[D] What data purports that SIMULATIONS [Seen in **(3)** prior] ARE possible?
SEPARATELY, physicist James Gates’ adinkra postulation, (AND or the simulation hypothesis) shows that our universe, possesses
simulatory features, thereafter our universe may be simulatory.
If our universe is indeed simulatory, in the same way [C] is probable, our creators are probable, and thereafter probably non-omniscient/non-omnipotent in the like.
….
RESOURCE SUMMARY:
Simulation sample: (Illustris)
[ii] Simulation Hypothesis: (findable on Wikipedia)
[iii] Fascinating (though perhaps less viable than the simulation hypothesis): (James Gates' Adinkra postulation)
[iv] ‘General’ artificial intelligence (a rather profound approximation) : (See Deepmind's Atari Q player, or Alpha Go)
[v] PHYSICIST JEREMY ENGLAND SHOWS THAT MATTER ATTRIBUTES LIFE-LIKE PROPERTIES AS TIME DIVERGES. (See Dissipative Adaptation)
[vi] A quantum computing synopsis, of mine: (Available upon request, via personal message)
Essentially, see DWAVE.
[vii] Relevant graphs:
[a] Ray Kurzweil’s law of accelerating returns.
Moore’s law [modern variants in the like]
NOTE [2]: I am of course atheistic, (I have zero beliefs). The sequences while not novel, are combined in novel ways, such that the PROBABILITY of non-omniscient Gods/Creators is reported.
As such, one needs not belief/faith/certainty to observe PROBABILITIES.
WARNING: Some statistics/words occur in UPPER CASE FORM or various colours, because reading all lower case/uniform colour is simply quite tiresome.
God is PROBABLY quite real. (however, not the omniscient, all powerful kind seen in religion)
We are simulating more and more detailed universes (Example 'illustris') as computing power increases, and creating more and more sophisticated artificial intelligence.
If this computing increase doesn’t end (ie we aren’t all wiped out) our simulations will eventually get detailed enough to contain INTELLIGENCE or create artificial intelligence. that exceeds humans on all tasks (God-like software).
Then, (probably when we are a still a mortal species, having not yet solved ageing…) we BECOME GODS, however NOT the OMNISCIENT, OMNIPOTENT God specified in religion.
In the same way, it is likely that THE VERY UNIVERSE WE OCCUPY may have come about, and thus likewise, God (it’s creator(s)) is non-omnipotent, non-infinite etc.
PROBABLE NON-OMNISCIENT GODS
**(1)** Man-made 'General Artificial intelligence' (The brain based software we invent [that shall exceed humans in all tasks, not merely individual tasks as they do now]). [Eg Google Deepmind's atari q or alpha go]
**(2)** Intelligence that EVOLVES in our own simulations to become God-like (ie they create universes, or ‘general artificial intelligence’-like programs).
**(3)** The non-omnipotent, non-infinite Gods (human like?) that created our universe stemming from the same way that we simulate more and more detailed universes via **(4)** — constrained paths. (eg illustris)
**(4)** Mankind; for mankind shall perhaps promptly possess God bound capabilities, via **(1)** and **(2)**.
SCIENTIFIC-STATISTICS PAR PROBABLE NON-OMNISCIENT GODS
In SUMMARY, probabilistically, the ability to generate artificial intelligence, that surpasses the net intellect of one’s species, AND OR compute simulation of universes (with intellect resembling prior), IS THAT WHICH classifies said species as God-bound.
INTRODUCTION [A-B]:
['A'] What data purports that SUPER-human ARTIFICIAL INTELLECT [Seen in **(1)** prior] is possible?
The human brain operates at roughly 10¹⁵ floating point operations per second.
NON-TRIVIALLY ACCESSIBLE super-computing platforms already exist, such that this operation cycle is attained.
TRIVIALLY ACCESSIBLE resources shall exist at 2020’s horizon, in tandem with KURZWEIL’S LAW OF ACCELERATING RETURNS, (and perhaps MOORE’S LAW/modern Moore’s law variants).
['B'] What data purports that SIMULATIONS [Seen in **(2)** prior] ARE possible?
Our universe is at least linear scale [Dirac], AND at most exponential order [inflation].
Therein, a simulation of such shall require an exponential order capable machine.
Exponential order capable machines exist today.
These are called quantum computers. (See Dwave)
These quantum computers, though superior, are not yet sufficient to encode detailed universes (that contain intelligence).
However, VIA non-exponential machines (super-computers), THERE EXISTS QUITE DETAILED simulations of our universe. (see illustris)
CONCLUSION [C-D]:
Artificial intelligence, together with quantum computers, are enhancing in concurrence with measures such as KURZWEIL’S LAW OF ACCELERATING RETURNS.
Particularly, from these MEASURES, super-human Ai is PERHAPS INEVITABLE, and such shall therein PROBABLY occur within the scope-of 20-40 years. (See Nick Bostrom's super intelligence)
At this juncture, mankind shall maintain non-omniscience/non-omnipotence (Ageing yet solved, Energy issues persist et cetera).
[C] What data purports that SIMULATIONS [Seen in **(4)** prior] ARE possible?
Thereafter, man becomes non-omniscient, non-omnipotent Gods, having created super-human artificial intelligence, therein **(4)** is probable.
[D] What data purports that SIMULATIONS [Seen in **(3)** prior] ARE possible?
SEPARATELY, physicist James Gates’ adinkra postulation, (AND or the simulation hypothesis) shows that our universe, possesses
simulatory features, thereafter our universe may be simulatory.
If our universe is indeed simulatory, in the same way [C] is probable, our creators are probable, and thereafter probably non-omniscient/non-omnipotent in the like.
….
RESOURCE SUMMARY:
Simulation sample: (Illustris)
[ii] Simulation Hypothesis: (findable on Wikipedia)
[iii] Fascinating (though perhaps less viable than the simulation hypothesis): (James Gates' Adinkra postulation)
[iv] ‘General’ artificial intelligence (a rather profound approximation) : (See Deepmind's Atari Q player, or Alpha Go)
[v] PHYSICIST JEREMY ENGLAND SHOWS THAT MATTER ATTRIBUTES LIFE-LIKE PROPERTIES AS TIME DIVERGES. (See Dissipative Adaptation)
[vi] A quantum computing synopsis, of mine: (Available upon request, via personal message)
Essentially, see DWAVE.
[vii] Relevant graphs:
[a] Ray Kurzweil’s law of accelerating returns.
Moore’s law [modern variants in the like]
![[Image: SHODAN_hires.jpg]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/55/SHODAN_hires.jpg)
