Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 12, 2024, 7:26 am

Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
He is cray
(November 7, 2016 at 7:58 am)Nymphadora Wrote: Well. I'm convinced. This batshit crazy dude went from smoking weed to crack.

I think he's just been going from milder to more intense shrooms.

Actual photo of the batshit crazy dude:

[Image: ae6f7a641048c997d91e8379f2d9183e.jpg]

...I mean, he may look like a blue smurf right now, rather than his bodybuilding self... but this is the effect of the shrooms, you see. This was the MOST RECENT photo of him.

Oh fuck I caught some of his shrooms, Facepalm
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 8:07 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 1:50 pm)Mudhammam Wrote: Man in 2016 BCE: IT'S TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN.

Man in 2016 CE: IT'S SIMULATIONS LIVING IN SUPER COMPUTERS OPERATED BY TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN.

fixed

You predominantly persist in the expression of nonsensical anecdotes.
Have you not any scientific awareness?

(November 7, 2016 at 8:11 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote:
(November 7, 2016 at 7:58 am)Nymphadora Wrote: Well. I'm convinced. This batshit crazy dude went from smoking weed to crack.

I think he's just been going from milder to more intense shrooms.

Actual photo of the batshit crazy dude:

[Image: ae6f7a641048c997d91e8379f2d9183e.jpg]

...I mean, he may look like a blue smurf right now, rather than his bodybuilding self... but this is the effect of the shrooms, you see. This was the MOST RECENT photo of him.

Oh fuck I caught some of his shrooms, Facepalm
Incorrect.
Proximal photo, captured 3 hours prior: 
I had but purged my shirt's unity, whilst reaching for my mobile...
[Image: Ca3a4v3.png]
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Big Grin

You look more cool than batshit crazy, which is epic.

Interesting expression on your face, lol.

It's rather confusing when you criticize my posts but still give me kudos, Jordan lol. It's like those trolls who kudos me when I think they're funny. JbrentonK (is he your cousin?) does the same. Lol.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 8:23 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Big Grin

You look more cool than batshit crazy, which is epic.

Interesting expression on your face, lol.

It's rather confusing when you criticize my posts but still give me kudos, Jordan lol. It's like those trolls who kudos me when I think they're funny. JbrentonK (is he your cousin?) does the same. Lol.

I simply attribute kudos betwixt:
[0] Commentaries that garner my amusement.
and or
[1] Recognition of minimal effort. (whence commentaries surpass sub-par quintessential thread-response sequences)
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
I recently read a book on AI and it said that we have yet to produce anything as intelligent as the insect. I am not very knowledable on this subject but this does not merit god status to me. Nature does a much better job with random mutation and natural selection.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 8:33 am)chimp3 Wrote: I recently read a book on AI and it said that we have yet to produce anything as intelligent as the insect. I am not very knowledable on this subject but this does not merit god status to me. Nature does a much better job with random mutation and natural selection.

Albeit, artificial brain based models have already exceeded/equaled human intelligence, amidst non-trivial, cognitive tasks, ranging from language translation to disease diagnosis.

See skype, earbud translators, watson....
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 8:38 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(November 7, 2016 at 8:33 am)chimp3 Wrote: I recently read a book on AI and it said that we have yet to produce anything as intelligent as the insect. I am not very knowledable on this subject but this does not merit god status to me. Nature does a much better job with random mutation and natural selection.

Albeit, artificial brain based models have already exceeded/equaled human intelligence, amidst non-trivial, cognitive tasks, ranging from language translation to disease diagnosis.

See skype, earbud translators, watson....

Apparently not as intelligent as insects , regardless !
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 8:08 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: You postulate quite the theistic behaviour.

No, actually I don't. But I guess you're entitled to your opinion, which is honestly, all you have in this thread.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 8:38 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Albeit, artificial brain based models have already exceeded/equaled human intelligence skill, amidst non-trivial, cognitive tasks, ranging from language translation chess to disease diagnosis other trival shit like that.

Fixed.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 8:59 am)chimp3 Wrote:
(November 7, 2016 at 8:38 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Albeit, artificial brain based models have already exceeded/equaled human intelligence, amidst non-trivial, cognitive tasks, ranging from language translation to disease diagnosis.

See skype, earbud translators, watson....

Apparently not as intelligent as insects , regardless !

The insect scenario you recall,  dithers particularly on the horizon of hardware replication.

The paths via machine learning faces:

'A' Hardware replication. [From  C. elegans worm neuronal replication, to Henry Markram's mammalian brain constructs]

'B' Theory-bound compactions of neuronal cognition [Deep Neural Networks-aligned models, Convolutional Neural Networks, Recurrent Neural Networks, Long Short Term Memory, Deep Reinforcement Learning that utilizes Deep Neural Nets...]


Therein:

[0] - 'A' is but entirely non-human surpassing. [approximates worms, partial mammalian brain as observed in 'A']
and

[1] 'B' has already produced models that exceed human performance, in cognitive, non trivial tasks. [Although the human brain oscillates abound higher efficiencies entirely, brain based models excel in individual tasks/task groups as observed in 'B'.

(November 7, 2016 at 9:11 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote:
(November 7, 2016 at 8:38 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Albeit, artificial brain based models have already exceeded/equaled human intelligence skill, amidst non-trivial, cognitive tasks, ranging from language translation chess to disease diagnosis other trival shit like that.

Fixed.

Invalid.


...for these models have exceeded/equaled human performance, in non-trivial COGNITIVE TASKS, including language translation to disease diagnosis.


Cognitive Samples of human-performance intelligence surpassing instances:

Skype - translates 40+ languages using neural models
Watson - exceeded two best jeopardy players, diagnoses diseases better than human doctors
Earbud Translator - translates languages, using neural models
etc


Separately, chess is trivially solvable by non-neural software.
(This had long occurred in the 1990's. See Deep Blue)
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof and evidence will always equal Science zwanzig 103 9882 December 17, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Young more likely to pray than over-55s - survey zebo-the-fat 16 2134 September 28, 2021 at 5:44 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Is God weaker than theists imagine, and is mankind stronger? invalid 6 2626 March 5, 2021 at 6:38 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Are miracles evidence of the existence of God? ido 74 6674 July 24, 2020 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Muslim students less likely to be awarded top class degrees. Succubus#2 28 3124 March 22, 2020 at 6:02 am
Last Post: Belacqua
  Religious fundamentalists more likely to believe fake news OakTree500 30 4782 November 10, 2018 at 4:32 pm
Last Post: no one
  If theists understood "evidence" Silver 135 16871 October 10, 2018 at 10:50 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Moses parting the sea evidence or just made up Smain 12 3380 June 28, 2018 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Are introverts less likely to like organised religion? Der/die AtheistIn 8 1578 March 22, 2018 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: GODZILLA
  Can religion be a type of Stockholm syndrome? ignoramus 5 2978 June 10, 2017 at 9:54 am
Last Post: Cyberman



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)