Whales with people living inside them.

(November 9, 2016 at 7:25 am)Expired Wrote: Whales with people living inside them.

Wales has lots of people living inside it, over 3 million in fact.

Goombah, it's a fucking good job that we're conversing with you over the internet, if we were actually talking, I have a feeling we'd all be drenched in phlegm.

You dribbling cuntbag.

Basic human decency.

Oops. My belief was just trampled.

(November 9, 2016 at 6:43 am)goombah111 Wrote:

(November 8, 2016 at 6:27 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Hey, leave me and my colleagues out of these silly games.

you really do see everything dont you?

I am the footfall on the stair. I am the silence in the air. I am the shadow that isn't there. I am everywhere.

(November 9, 2016 at 6:43 am)goombah111 Wrote: my behavior is the only way i can stay interested in this thread.

Well, if that's your idea of "interesting", just understand that the only thing you're doing is feeding the stereotype of 9/11 nutbag. Of course, you may well be doing that deliberately in order to be able to claim that you're being treated like a nutbag rather than being heard.

(November 9, 2016 at 6:43 am)goombah111 Wrote: yeap, it can get pretty crazy, people can get their stories mixed up. understandable.

understandable...until 200 people say the exact same thing with absolute certainty. 

at that point you have to stop denying the truth.

to write it off so easily that 200 people with the same story are all mistaken in the same way, is one CRAZY CONSPIRACY THEORY

I didn't say those guys were mistaken in reporting that they heard explosions. Go back and reread my point, since you seem to have missed it. Here, I'll sum it up for you: I think it's entirely possible that you are misinterpreting what they heard. You're importing your own assumptions.

I also think the "exact same thing" is likely an exaggeration on your part.

(November 9, 2016 at 6:43 am)goombah111 Wrote: as to your explosions thing, many people said a bomb went off before the plane hit. and theres a difference between a building collapsing bomb explosion and a gas take blowing up.

Again, missed my point. In a situation as chaotic as a major fire in a high-occupancy high-rise, being able to tell the difference between a bomb exploding and a gas tank exploding is very difficult, I'd imagine -- I mean, I'm a firefighter in that building: I'm wearing a Nomex hood under my helmet which covers my ears; I've got an SCBA which impairs my perceptions both visual and aural; I've got the noise of a panicked crowd running past me; I've got a battalion chief issuing orders over the radio and are those orders for my crew or Station 17's crew?

You and I know there's a difference between a low-order detonation and high explosive. But thinking that in a situation like that we can say "It was a bomb, I heard it" is a really long stretch.

(November 9, 2016 at 6:43 am)goombah111 Wrote: there is nothing in that building capable of making the noise heard in that payphone clip of the video i posted.

You'll need to support this claim with reliable evidence.

Quote:plus, the lobby exploded. and the basement. 

That doesn't mean they exploded because of bombs. You'll need to demonstrate that with evidence.

(November 9, 2016 at 6:43 am)goombah111 Wrote: im answering a lot, its you who wont answer. 

Except, you're responding to ... wait for it ... my answer. You're claiming it was an inside job. You're claiming you have evidence. And you invited questions. You're getting them. And you'll get more.

Don't worry, you'll live.

(November 9, 2016 at 6:43 am)goombah111 Wrote: just because you dont have to answer doesnt mean you shouldnt.

I'll wait for you to address my point about explosives or flammables subject being present. I want to see you prove that there were none at all in a building that could house 20,000 workers.

(November 9, 2016 at 7:28 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: You dribbling cuntbag.

Dude, dropping to his level doesn't score any points.

In response to the OP, the closest thing I'd come to believing right now is the existence of life elsewhere in the universe. I wouldn't go as far as to say that I actively believe it, because my only defense could be "it just seems extremely likely," but hey, that's pretty close.

im done with you. 90% of the evidence you are requesting is in the video. 
put in some minor effort and you might learn something.

had you done prior research you would know these answers without the video.

i was, for some reason, under the assumption you knew the basics of the theory.
i guess i was wrong. you make a lot of assumptions. try using the scientific method.

Womens driving abilities.

(November 9, 2016 at 2:25 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(November 9, 2016 at 7:28 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: Y

D

if youd bother to take the energy you put into your pointless posts and used it towards actually coming up with something factual/evident then we might actually get somewhere.

---

(November 9, 2016 at 2:32 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: In response to the OP, the closest thing I'd come to believing right now is the existence of life elsewhere in the universe.  I wouldn't go as far as to say that I actively believe it, because my only defense could be "it just seems extremely likely," but hey, that's pretty close.

thats about all you can say about anything isnt it? its extremely likely that what we see with out eyes is what exists in front of us. 

at a certain level, everything is beliefs. beliefs based on likelihood.
according to our tools which most likely work, the data has implications. we infer as best we can.

humans are pretty incredible compared to every other species on earth.