(January 20, 2017 at 10:24 am)JROHAN Wrote: What's the point of me trying to convince you of any great thing?

You're a bunch of moronic idiots!!

Why are you blaming us for your inability to convince us?

Must not be that important, god didn't send it's best or brightest.

(January 20, 2017 at 12:46 pm)JROHAN Wrote: YOU WROTE:

The same happens in science. New evidence can overturn old theories.

MY RESPONSE:

If it were the same science would say something like:

'We currently believe Darwinian evolution to be a fact,

however, that may change tomorrow.'


Instead, they act as though they know for a fact

what they DO NOT know to be a fact!!!

I call that DISHONEST and IGNOBLE!!

Maybe that's because Darwinian evolution has been superseded by Evolutionary developmental biology.... the last in a sequence of adjustments, like I told you about.

So, if we know very well that the theory is "evolving", how can we "believe it to be a fact"?
The fact is that species did evolve.
The mechanisms behind this evolution are being described by that EDB. While it's good enough to account for all known mechanisms, it will stand.

(January 20, 2017 at 1:07 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:

(January 20, 2017 at 10:24 am)JROHAN Wrote: What's the point of me trying to convince you of any great thing?

You're a bunch of moronic idiots!!

Why are you blaming us for your inability to convince us?

Must not be that important, god didn't send it's best or brightest.

'God' doesn't have any best or brightest.  Assholes?  Those he has.



Gravity?




It works.

MAN EVOLVING FROM SOME MYTHOLOGICAL APELIKE COMMON ANCESTOR

DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN NO INTELLIGENT DESIGNER WAS INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS

(January 20, 2017 at 2:32 pm)JROHAN Wrote: MAN EVOLVING FROM SOME MYTHOLOGICAL APELIKE COMMON ANCESTOR

DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN NO INTELLIGENT DESIGNER WAS INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS

What does it mean?

It means that this jerkoff thinks his own bible is a pile of shit because it says that his fucking god made us in his own image.

@ the OP

Call it faith in science if you want. Call it whatever you want. I don't care. Just fuck off.

(January 20, 2017 at 2:32 pm)JROHAN Wrote: MAN EVOLVING FROM SOME MYTHOLOGICAL APELIKE COMMON ANCESTOR

DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN NO INTELLIGENT DESIGNER WAS INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS

IT MEANS there may indeed have been an intelligent designer involved in the process

Such theoretical speculations, on the part of atheists, are not necessarily correct!!!

THAT'S WHAT IT MEANS!!!

(January 20, 2017 at 2:49 pm)JROHAN Wrote:

(January 20, 2017 at 2:32 pm)JROHAN Wrote: MAN EVOLVING FROM SOME MYTHOLOGICAL APELIKE COMMON ANCESTOR

DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN NO INTELLIGENT DESIGNER WAS INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS

IT MEANS there may indeed have been an intelligent designer involved in the process

Such theoretical speculations, on the part of atheists, are not necessarily correct!!!

THAT'S WHAT IT MEANS!!!

bold/unbold mine

What do you mean by "may [edit] have been". Is it also probable that there may not have been? 

What do you mean by "not necessarily correct"? Is it also probable that they are correct?

Your opinion here has been found to be lacking and without merit. You have nothing more.

(January 20, 2017 at 2:49 pm)JROHAN Wrote:

(January 20, 2017 at 2:32 pm)JROHAN Wrote: MAN EVOLVING FROM SOME MYTHOLOGICAL APELIKE COMMON ANCESTOR

DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN NO INTELLIGENT DESIGNER WAS INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS

IT MEANS there may indeed have been an intelligent designer involved in the process

Such theoretical speculations, on the part of atheists, are not necessarily correct!!!

THAT'S WHAT IT MEANS!!!

Or maybe it was the lizard people.