Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 7, 2025, 6:37 am
Thread Rating:
The next Doctor Who is going to be......
|
(July 17, 2017 at 2:12 am)Mathilda Wrote:(July 16, 2017 at 9:01 pm)Lutrinae Wrote: Women can't wear clothes with pockets? Not if we nip it in the bud now... Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" (July 16, 2017 at 2:53 pm)Lutrinae Wrote:(July 16, 2017 at 2:51 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: ] She'd be the twelfth regeneration if the first one wasn't a regeneration of a previous one. RE: The next Doctor Who is going to be......
July 17, 2017 at 8:58 am
(This post was last modified: July 17, 2017 at 9:00 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
Will she be in the movies or is there some series I haven't heard about? I saw the same article in Facebook and you'll actually be surprised but the fanboys are actually defending the decision, they were saying something about Who being a alien or something and change forms, I'm not sure but it seemed legit.
Edit: Ok you already knew that sorryyy Edit 2: Actually, everybody knows that, I'll let myself out, lol.
I'm still waiting for a news that someone had cast a woman to play Jesus in a movie.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
(July 16, 2017 at 5:17 pm)Whateverist Wrote: Okay, obviously in over my head here. Never watched an episode so no clue what a regeneration is. Meh you're not missing much IMO. Never understood the craze.
I stopped liking the show after River Song's origin was revealed. I already disliked them bringing along both Amy and Rory, the two had zero chemistry and even their characters did nothing to indicate they were actually interested in each other, so the show did a terrible job in that respect. They can take it in whatever direction they like, I'm just no longer interested. Good for them if they want to explore completely new territory, but if they're not going to put their best effort into it, it's not something I want to follow.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
--- There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views. (July 16, 2017 at 4:29 pm)pocaracas Wrote:(July 16, 2017 at 4:09 pm)Cecelia Wrote: It did, I thought. It was in Matt Smiths last Christmas episode. As for regeneration itself, as with most explanations of Time Lord lore, the go to answer is: Rassilon did it. Rassilon in the new series is insane / evil but in the original series he was the highly respected founder of Time Lord society and helped invented time travel and regeneration as well as most other things. So it's totally possible that Rassilon granted a new set of regenerations to the Doctor in order to ensure that the Doctor could find Gallifrey. (July 17, 2017 at 10:42 am)Tiberius Wrote:(July 16, 2017 at 4:29 pm)pocaracas Wrote: I don't remember that...but sure...why not make the regenerations something that the government of Gallifrey can add to? So if he resets the whole regeneration cycle back to 0, that would mean he gets another 10 after Matt Smith, and Capaldi is the first of that new decalogue? Interesting.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
--- There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)