(August 9, 2017 at 5:13 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: My main concern with any potential war is that it will go the same way as the "war on terror" under Bush.

"The enemy is clearly in North Korea.  Let's invade Indonesia while we're at it!"

As if the WLB knows the difference.  It isn't as if the fucker has a hotel in either place.

(August 9, 2017 at 8:58 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:

(August 9, 2017 at 8:23 pm)Jehanne Wrote: It wasn't "magic"; it was modern air-power against largely unarmed combatants and civilians.  If the US is so superior in air power, why did Trump use 50 cruise missiles at 100 million a piece to disable a Syrian airbase for a day or two?

Because trump didn't want his Air Force to shoot down one of Putin's planes in Syria when Putin's dick is up his asss

Hetro, bi, gay, I agree, kind hard to get your rocks off if you suddenly twist your body in a direction that is in direct physical opposition as the partner/s you are getting off with. Anyone who has had sex knows the pain of zigging when you should have zagged. 

45 might be 71 but acts like the typical HS jock who cant figure out that "grab em by the pussy" wont get him laid.

(August 9, 2017 at 4:31 pm)Jello Wrote: Because baiting them into invading the south is a smart idea, right?
I mean, we'd finally get a unified Korea, i guess.

All the baiting is coming from Kim, he's boasting his nuke missiles can now hit the US homeland.
He better not mess with Don..

(August 9, 2017 at 4:44 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: You can be very assured that in a totalitarian despot ruthless and paranoid enough to starve its citizens in order to devote resources to perfecting a nuclear weapon would also have devoted enough resources to ensure the nuclear arsenal is adaquately concealed, hardened, dispersed and and survivable such that the US would be kidding itself if it thought it could have any reasonable chance of taking most of it out through surgical strikes.

The US has a selection of bunker-busting and ground-penetrating bombs and we can be pretty sure US satellites have pinpointed the locations of the ICBM launch sites.
Like I said earlier, they're Kim's "teeth", so he'd have no bite if they were taken out, no need for a fullscale ground war..

(August 10, 2017 at 9:27 am)Dropship Wrote:

(August 9, 2017 at 4:31 pm)Jello Wrote: Because baiting them into invading the south is a smart idea, right?
I mean, we'd finally get a unified Korea, i guess.

All the baiting is coming from Kim, he's boasting his nuke missiles can now hit the US homeland.
He better not mess with Don..

Only Republican ass licking idiots can mess with such a hopeless egotistical moron as don and still come out second best.

Kim is no Republican, no ass licker, and no idiot.

Don is doomed.

Let's hope not too many Americans who didn't vote for him need to die on account of the accidental circumstances of being citizen of a country stupid enough to have elected him.

(August 10, 2017 at 9:37 am)Dropship Wrote:

(August 9, 2017 at 4:44 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: You can be very assured that in a totalitarian despot ruthless and paranoid enough to starve its citizens in order to devote resources to perfecting a nuclear weapon would also have devoted enough resources to ensure the nuclear arsenal is adaquately concealed, hardened, dispersed and and survivable such that the US would be kidding itself if it thought it could have any reasonable chance of taking most of it out through surgical strikes.

The US has a selection of bunker-busting and ground-penetrating bombs and we can be pretty sure US satellites have pinpointed the locations of the ICBM launch sites.
Like I said earlier, they're Kim's "teeth", so he'd have no bite if they were taken out, no need for a fullscale ground war..

FUCK YOUR DIRTY HARRY BULLSHIT....... This is not a game.

(August 9, 2017 at 5:20 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: (re Kim il jong)...is ruthless and brutal and the world would be better off without him, but that doesn't make him a loose cannon.

Yeah, Don could simply send in a sniper to get him, no need for a massive ground war..
It's not a new idea anyway-

---

(August 10, 2017 at 9:37 am)Brian37 Wrote: ..That asshole is no Truman, no JFK and no Reagan. He is a inept clown who thinks the world is his personal episode of WWE Smackdown. Problem is this is the real world and not a fucking TV SHOW.

Not sure I understand you mate, I heard Don say on TV a while back- "My first duty as President is to protect the American people".
It's simple self-defence..

(August 10, 2017 at 9:42 am)Dropship Wrote:

(August 9, 2017 at 5:20 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: (re Kim il jong)...is ruthless and brutal and the world would be better off without him, but that doesn't make him a loose cannon.

Yeah, Don could simply send in a sniper to get him, no need for a massive ground war..
It's not a new idea anyway-

FUCK YOU ASSHOLE! 

There is a little bit more to global politics than "Just do it" and "shoot first".

Listen you dumbfuck, you don't simply break something up. Long term thinking matters not "shoot first".

We have already AND REPEATEDLY told you why neither using nukes or just a conventional war, or even just air strikes WILL NOT WORK.

1. CHINA DOES NOT WANT A REFUGEE PROBLEM
2. CHINA DOES NOT WANT A UNITED WESTERN STYLE GOV NEXT TO IT'S BORDER.
3. You create a power void in NK China will attempt to fill it, BOOM, now America is at war with CHINA.

Point being you stupid fuck, IT ISN'T THAT SIMPLE!


And then there is the risk of WW3, with nukes, not NKs nukes but CHINA AND RUSSIA, YOU STUPID FUCK.

Truman knew the risk, JFK knew the risk, Reagan knew the risk. You and your inept orange asshat Batman villain don't seem to understand that is what is at stake.

This is not your fucking planet alone you stupid fuck, 7 billion humans will be greatly affected by either a nuclear war or even just a ground war.

WW2 cost 50 million lives worldwide. WW3 if started will make that look like a domestic homicide. 

You may want to treat human lives as simply a joke, but I don't.