(October 4, 2017 at 3:13 pm)Khemikal Wrote: How fast does your mind generally reach for the grassy knoll Drich?

When the gubment is slow on what should be an easy explanation. They are purposely drawing this one out. maybe trying to find a second guy, or maybe they don't want the second guy to know they know of him... point is the gubment is not being truthful.

(October 5, 2017 at 1:43 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

Actually it should read, " Your corporate lobby is safe."

---

(October 5, 2017 at 8:23 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: If you were perfect you'd be more obnoxious than you are now.

Don't make me take you outside so you can kick my ass.

(October 4, 2017 at 4:48 pm)Brian37 Wrote:

(October 4, 2017 at 4:07 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Yeah, Texas Tower. The cops had to borrow Wells Fargo armored cars to retrieve the wounded. Lesson learned there, free armored cars save lives.

Yep and that was in the 1970s and look at how many you can murder now, pretty cool huh? Sicko in Vegas was over a football field away with a fucking machine gun. 

But no, you don't even need that, all you need is two handguns and extra clips and you can walk into a College and murder 30 plus people. BUT who gives a fuck, guns are soooooooo fun.

We shouldn't give a shit who gets one as long as the "responsible" gun owners can keep their useless laws.

And never mind most of those deaths are suicides or domestic violence or accidental in the home. 

GUNS ARE FUN!

 
All guns are machines..
No he did not have access to an auto fire weapon no his gun was not modified to fire automatically. he got one round per trigger pull. the same thing happens in a double action revolver. he simply figured out how to pull the trigger faster.

or you can use a series of bombs made from fertlizer and diesel fuel to create 1000 casulatiies and do almost 700 million dollars in damages..
If there is a will there is a way. do you feel better that the okhoma city bombing used bombs to kill and mame people?

Are you so ignorant to deny ISIS's weapon of choice in the middle east? why do ISIS and other terror groups use the bomb/bomber rather than automatic rifles??? ever wonder that? in a land where everyone can legaly open carry a automatic machine gun, why does isis use the bomb?

for the same reason the douche in texas was on the 36th floor. a good guy with a gun would have shot him down before he could have made very much of a mess. Unless you take or nullify the gun/like in the middle east where everyone has an auto fire AK. Then it escalates to bombs. Seriously is that what you want?

---

(October 4, 2017 at 5:26 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote:

(October 3, 2017 at 2:19 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: No. But his brother said he had no religious or political affiliation.

I have found all too often that when you hear the words "no religious or political affiliation" what is meant is that the person being spoken of is of the dominant religious and political opinions, or if in the third person may hold0 the same opinion as the speaker. All too often when the opinion or affiliation is considered the norm, then it is no longer thought of as opinion or affiliation.

and I found the opposite to be true. the qualifier he has no "radical" affiliations which one shares a view. NO affiliation means one could give a squirt one way or another.

---

(October 4, 2017 at 5:52 pm)Joods Wrote:

(October 4, 2017 at 2:43 pm)Drich Wrote: Has anyone gave a reason yet???

I saw an interview with his brother and he said the shooter had no strong political views, no religious views, no money problem.. last he spoke with him he was asking about his mother.

maybe this guy was at the wrong place at the wrong time.

Yeah. Okay. He was in the wrong place at the wrong time. With dozens of guns conveniently placed in a hotel room that he happened to be using. 

That is the stupidest thing I've heard yet.  

Was he supposed to be shooting people elsewhere? That was a rhetorical question. Don't answer it. 

Look - the shooter is dead. Unless he comes back from the dead, we're never going to explicitly know what his motive/reason was. He killed 59 people with his fucking guns. 

Trying to figure out what his reason was isn't going to bring those people back and it's not going to UN-traumatize over 500 people. Guessing what his problem was isn't going to somehow make this all better. 

Actually helping those in need will though. I sure thank those who are local to this, who have stepped up and offered assistance in lieu of "prayers and thoughts". At least those people have the courage and the compassion to actually do something.

Glob... I got to remind myself if not for the "walking retarded" I woud not have a job... So here let me digest it further for you...

Wrong place at wrong time= some douche bag who was on vacation who had no indention of anything. meaning the suspect in the shooting was just in a pre planned firing position, in the wrong room on the wrong day. (why?? to take the fall for the real fire team)

the real fire team goes in shoots him. they do their thing, watch the cops breach the building slip out of suspect's room into their room just down the hall and boom people like you are calling for this guy's family to be castrated. and the real fire team gets away.

---

(October 4, 2017 at 6:07 pm)A Theist Wrote:

(October 4, 2017 at 5:52 pm)Joods Wrote: Yeah. Okay. He was in the wrong place at the wrong time. With dozens of guns conveniently placed in a hotel room that he happened to be using. 

That is the stupidest thing I've heard yet.  

Was he supposed to be shooting people elsewhere? That was a rhetorical question. Don't answer it. 

Look - the shooter is dead. Unless he comes back from the dead, we're never going to explicitly know what his motive/reason was. He killed 59 people with his fucking guns. 

Trying to figure out what his reason was isn't going to bring those people back and it's not going to UN-traumatize over 500 people. Guessing what his problem was isn't going to somehow make this all better. 

Actually helping those in need will though. I sure thank those who are local to this, who have stepped up and offered assistance in lieu of "prayers and thoughts". At least those people have the courage and the compassion to actually do something.

As you said, as far as his motive he's probably the only person who could have answered that. According to recent news reports his father was a diagnosed psychopath and was once on the FBI's ten most wanted list for bank robberies and prison escape. I also thought I heard today that the shooter had taken some valium right before his shooting spree, (anyone else hear that)? Regardless, it had to take a cold heart devoid of any consideration for human life for someone to kill 59 people and wounding 500+ others. I thought it was also reported that he had either a home made bomb or bomb making materials as well. But those were some of the earlier reports.

But again, why make a statement lke this and not leave an actual statement? unless ISIS already did, and we are chasing our tails because we have been duped by false media assumptions.

---

(October 4, 2017 at 7:59 pm)Divinity Wrote:

(October 4, 2017 at 5:42 pm)A Theist Wrote: Check this out. Leaving out everything but her cuss words in each sentence:

"Fuck shit. fucking, bitching, FUCKING. fucking ass. fucked. bitch. fucking."

Young ladies shouldn't be using that kind of language. If I knew your mother's phone number I'd call her and tell her that you're doing a lot of cussing on the internet. Only guys are supposed to talk that way. Not girls. Sewer mouth.

If you're older than me, I'm surprised you know how to use the fucking internet grandpa.  See, unlike back in your day--men and women are equals you misogynist prick.  So why don't you go back to masturbating to mass murderers, and stop lecturing people on what words they use.  

It's fucking ridiculous how you fucks will get upset about some words, or people kneeling during the anthem.  But someone goes and murders 59 people, and well... there's just no doing anything about that.

make you feel better I never saw you as a young lady..

---

(October 4, 2017 at 7:59 pm)Divinity Wrote:

(October 4, 2017 at 5:42 pm)A Theist Wrote: Check this out. Leaving out everything but her cuss words in each sentence:

"Fuck shit. fucking, bitching, FUCKING. fucking ass. fucked. bitch. fucking."

Young ladies shouldn't be using that kind of language. If I knew your mother's phone number I'd call her and tell her that you're doing a lot of cussing on the internet. Only guys are supposed to talk that way. Not girls. Sewer mouth.

If you're older than me, I'm surprised you know how to use the fucking internet grandpa.  See, unlike back in your day--men and women are equals you misogynist prick.  So why don't you go back to masturbating to mass murderers, and stop lecturing people on what words they use.  

It's fucking ridiculous how you fucks will get upset about some words, or people kneeling during the anthem.  But someone goes and murders 59 people, and well... there's just no doing anything about that.

make you feel better I never saw you as a young lady..

Does it make you feel better that you're seen as a fucking asshole?


They'll throw this guy right out of the conservatard party.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/conserv...nts=disqus

Quote:Conservative columnist calls for repeal of 2nd Amendment — and destroys gun nuts’ favorite arguments

Of course he's right.  But what does "right" mean to an ammosexual?

Hey Drippy,

THE END RESULT was still ACCESS and because of his ACCESS 59 people are dead and thousands injured and those whom survived will need psychiatric care for PTSD.

if you agree he was disturbed, and disturbed people should not have firearms then you cant bitch about the sane who actually want to PREVENT such events in the future.

Otherwise all I am seeing from you is arguing to protect an object.

(October 5, 2017 at 7:29 am)Brian37 Wrote:

(October 5, 2017 at 7:15 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: The stories I've seen offer up gambling as a speculative reason, but not any clear figure. Got a link?

I swear I am going to TAR AND FEATHER (Translation, metaphorically KEEP PULLING MY HAIR OUT) the next person that speculates at motive. 

[...]

PLEASE STOP TALKING ABOUT MOTIVE.

You can go bald so far as I'm concerned. If you don't want to speculate, don't. If you'd harangue everyone who doesn't see things exactly the way you do, great.

Let me know how that's working out for you.

(October 5, 2017 at 2:21 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Hey Drippy,

THE END RESULT was still ACCESS and because of his ACCESS 59 people are dead and thousands injured and those whom survived will need psychiatric care for PTSD.

if you agree he was disturbed, and disturbed people should not have firearms then you cant bitch about the sane who actually want to PREVENT such events in the future.

Otherwise all I am seeing from you is arguing to protect an object.

And because little timmy mcvey had access to diesel fuel and fertlizer he kill 3x more people wounded almost 2x as many and destroyed 700 million dollar more because he has ACCESS TO DIESEL Fuel

Does it ease you little liberal mind that hose people were blown apart rather than shot down?

I don't get how you people think.. the problem is not the tool it is the nut bag who has the hammer in his hand that is the propblem not the hammer.. the hammer is just a tool it can be used to build or it can be used to tear down it s all on who uses the hammer.

Does that mean we bann diesel fuel because some nut job can make a bomb from it? to we even ban that particular fertilizer? no (we put regulations on it just like a gun, meaning we record whom ever buys it in quantity) you can get it at amazon.com

https://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywor...alt1wgap_b

That and 20 dollars worth of diesel and you could kill as many if not more. for far less money and remotly. that is why terrorists use bombs...

We are still new at this whole terror thing. once the douches in the trucks and the guys spraying crowds meet armed citizens then they will start blowing themselves up.

You are not fixing anything by taking away guns the Harvard study I left on your thread shows that conclusively. the problem is people. Not all are good like your world view demands. access to guns is an infants expression in terror. once force it met with force the real terrorists will show up straped to a bomb.

Then will that make you feel better? people dying due to explosion rather than bullet wound?

(October 5, 2017 at 9:58 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Yeah, also the 2 broken windows. Obviously it was just him shooting but was someone supposed to meet him up there and never showed up?

Who knows. It seems the more stuff that the FBI and investigators come up with the more elusive this guy's motive seems to be. The Clark County Sheriff seems to think that Paddock may have had help, but then again, he has nothing to back that up with so far. Just saw on the news that Paddock had two other potential targets in mind in Boston and in Chicago, areas where concerts are held. Hopefully, once they access his computer, they'll find much more about this guy and whether or not he either acted alone or had help.

Quote:The gunman who massacred dozens in Las Vegas researched possible attack locations in Boston and Chicago, multiple senior law enforcement officials briefed on the investigation told NBC News.

Stephen Paddock's potential targets included the most recent Lollapalooza festival in Chicago, which was held Aug. 3 to Aug. 6 in Grant Park, the officials said. Paddock, 64, went as far as booking a room in a Chicago hotel but did not show up, the officials said. Among the thousands of people who attended the festival was Malia Obama, daughter of former President Barack Obama.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/las-veg...spartandhp

(October 5, 2017 at 4:12 pm)Drich Wrote:

(October 5, 2017 at 2:21 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Hey Drippy,

THE END RESULT was still ACCESS and because of his ACCESS 59 people are dead and thousands injured and those whom survived will need psychiatric care for PTSD.

if you agree he was disturbed, and disturbed people should not have firearms then you cant bitch about the sane who actually want to PREVENT such events in the future.

Otherwise all I am seeing from you is arguing to protect an object.

And because little timmy mcvey had access to diesel fuel and fertlizer he kill 3x more people wounded almost 2x as many and destroyed 700 million dollar more because he has ACCESS TO DIESEL Fuel

Does it ease you little liberal mind that hose people were blown apart rather than shot down?

I don't get how you people think.. the problem is not the tool it is the nut bag who has the hammer in his hand that is the propblem not the hammer.. the hammer is just a tool it can be used to build or it can be used to tear down it s all on who uses the hammer.

Does that mean we bann diesel fuel because some nut job can make a bomb from it? to we even ban that particular fertilizer? no (we put regulations on it just like a gun, meaning we record whom ever buys it in quantity) you can get it at amazon.com

https://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywor...alt1wgap_b

That and 20 dollars worth of diesel and you could kill as many if not more. for far less money and remotly. that is why terrorists use bombs...

We are still new at this whole terror thing. once the douches in the trucks and the guys spraying crowds meet armed citizens then they will start blowing themselves up.

You are not fixing anything by taking away guns the Harvard study I left on your thread shows that conclusively. the problem is people. Not all are good like your world view demands. access to guns is an infants expression in terror. once force it met with force the real terrorists will show up straped to a bomb.

Then will that make you feel better? people dying due to explosion rather than bullet wound?

Bu bu bu people make bombs.

Bu bu bu people use knives

Bu bu bu people use bats

No shit dumbfuck

Out of bombs, knives and bats, which is easier to use?

Yea and you can choke your wife and hold her head under the water in the bathtub to kill her too, so lets outlaw bathtubs.

Glad you were not my mom when my dad got drunk off his ass and shot his gun with me in the room.

Your logic would be, "Meh, a drunk guy has every right to put his son's life in danger."


Just say, "I like guns, and I don't give a shit how many people die from using them."

That would be an honest answer.

But don't point to other bad shit happening and think that is a good argument to stop firearm fatalities.

Other bad shit happens? NO KIDDING?

Other bad shit happens? Would you call that old crusty news into CNN or shall I?"