Every individual is to be guided through the image he was born with (not talking physical) and the talents they are given throughout their 7 planes of existence. They aren't to change who they are, that in a way, is all we are being asked by God. To remain true to ourselves.

Unfortunately, the slogans of society have made white black and black white, people are so confused about the path and right and wrong.

Gender noncomformists -are- being true to themselves.....that's exactly what they're getting shit for on -this- "plane of existence".  Also..why 7, lol?  Why not 6 or 8 or eleventy two?

Anyone who tells someone why have to follow a certain line and destination in life, doesn't understand Humanity. When someone says they're gay, or they identify as male/female, or with a different culture, they aren't changing anything about who they are. They're finding themselves. At least, those who are doing it genuinely, not counting a minority that are doing it to get attention, or something. If they're not happy as they are, and changing does make them happy, without bringing pain to others in the process, then thta is who they should be.

Some father that tells his son that he's not being manly enough, and that he should love football and meat, and hate bright fluffy things, is not doing his son any favors.

"Don't play with the dolls in dresses son, play with the dolls with guns!" 

You'd think they'd go the other way with that if they were worried about their sons sexuality, but whatevs.

(November 15, 2017 at 5:42 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: This is what happens when people seek to choose what they want to be rather than submit, be at peace, and accept to what they are meant to be.

Who's going to tell them what they're meant to be? You?

Some god that can count the hairs on a Human's head, but can't understand fundamental Human psychology.

(November 15, 2017 at 4:49 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(November 15, 2017 at 3:38 pm)Mathilda Wrote: https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/001669.htm

You didn't copy and paste the very next sentence:

Quote:The labia ("lips" or folds of skin of the external female genitals) fuse, and the clitoris enlarges to appear like a penis.

Intersex genitalia is by no means normal male genitalia.

Yeah I knew you'd start trying to worm your way out of what you asserted and find ways to argue that it does not apply. But I would like to remind you what actually said:

(November 15, 2017 at 3:23 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: No one is born with female chromosomes and male genitalia. That's impossible.

You didn't specify 'normal' male genitalia, or specifically testicles or whatever. All you said was male genitalia.

And I showed that you were wrong.

You're probably reading this and thinking that I am being obtuse or pedantic, but the fault comes with your ignorance about biology.

Chromosomes are nothing more than instructions. It can't be used to say that a person is a man or a woman any more than showing the recipe you followed means that your dumpling is actually a souffle. What matters is how well the recipe is followed and the end result. Fact is that the fetus does start off female in the womb and hormonal washes determine whether it further develops into a girl or develops into a boy, or something inbetween. The same cells either end up forming a female's clitoris or a male's penis for example. So with the example I showed, there is a mixture of male and female development.

Now if you want to argue that the bits that have developed as male for an intersex individual aren't the same as the bits on a 'normal' male, then you'll need to explain why and back that up with evidence along with references to how it compares with the full range of 'normal' male genitalia found in the population. This will of course also require you to set a specific boundary of when normal stops and starts along a continuum.

(November 15, 2017 at 2:37 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: In forensic anthropology, they use 3 different types of racial groups:

Caucasoid
Negroid
Mongoloid

And it's much more about bone structure than skin color. Arabs fall under Caucasoid, for example. Central/South Americans are usually either caucasoid or mongoloid depending on how much their ancestry came from the natives, who were mongoloid, vs the europeans, who were caucasoid.

They use this to determine a person's race when they find their skeletal remains but don't have an identity.

Anyway, interesting bit of info. I don't think race is entirely a social construct. People evolved differently depending on their location in the world.

Yes, I'm aware of those classifications. Speaking from sociopolitical and historical context (as I generally do, since it's what I know best), these sorts of classifications were coined in an era when people used racial biology in order to ensure white dominance over blacks and immigrants; to argue that they are genetically inferior and must be ruled over by the superior white man. You mention that they are used in forensic anthropology; it should be noted that they are only used in forensic anthropology and nowhere else. But when interracial relationships cause these bone structures to be more difficult to categorize, what then? This system still falls victim to the categorization of race that society has put upon itself, rather than it being a natural sort of thing.

Calling these classification of race would be to misrepresent what race has represented in the course of human history. Society does not give a shit about bone structure. A light-skinned Brazilian may be seen as white while a darker skinned Brazilian may be seen as something else (black, hispanic, etc). Whether they are classified by anthropologists as "Caucasoid" or not does not matter.

(November 15, 2017 at 12:49 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: It is kind of contradictory. On one hand we say that femininity/masculinity don't exist and that males/females are the same and interchangeable. On the other hand we recognize the extreme psychological plight a person is put in when they feel feminine but are actually male.

So, which is it?

They cant both be true. Personally I'll take the latter one and acknowledge the differences between men and women.

As for race, I have no idea.

I suggest you look up trans feminism

Also gender and sex are not the same thing

(November 15, 2017 at 6:09 pm)Aegon Wrote:

(November 15, 2017 at 5:42 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: This is what happens when people seek to choose what they want to be rather than submit, be at peace, and accept to what they are meant to be.

Who's going to tell them what they're meant to be? You?

God and the leader he appointed, the witness among humans, who sees their states and trials and talents, and unseen image, and knows their talents is the one, and the one who will through God's book will manifest light and endless doors to endless doors to knowledge.

Just wait till the veil is removed.