Login

~~John V~~ · March 5, 2018 at 2:58 pm

Maybe he's digging up a link to the IOC's rationale for their T limits.

GrandizerII · March 6, 2018 at 11:05 am

Not sure if this article has been dug up already in this thread, but just in case, a VERY relevant read:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570685/

~~John V~~ · March 6, 2018 at 11:20 am

(March 6, 2018 at 11:05 am)Grandizer Wrote: Not sure if this article has been dug up already in this thread, but just in case, a VERY relevant read:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570685/

I read it previously but didn't post it as it just raises the questions that were already being raised, but doesn't offer conclusions.

GrandizerII · March 6, 2018 at 11:54 am

(March 5, 2018 at 2:58 pm)alpha male Wrote: Maybe he's digging up a link to the IOC's rationale for their T limits.

As for this, note the lower boundary for normal male range:

Quote:Normal male range Total Testosterone Levels - ≥10 nmol/L

https://www.iaaf.org/download/download?f...May%202011

Perhaps the rationale then is that it would be unfair for, say, intersex women who happen to have relatively high testosterone levels and yet still be below the male range to be moved to compete against men instead. Thus, 10's the limit.

~~John V~~ · March 6, 2018 at 1:04 pm

(March 6, 2018 at 11:54 am)Grandizer Wrote: As for this, note the lower boundary for normal male range:

Unless you measure it in the evening. Then it's 6.7:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15476527

Quote:Perhaps the rationale then is that it would be unfair for, say, intersex women who happen to have relatively high testosterone levels and yet still be below the male range to be moved to compete against men instead. Thus, 10's the limit.

"Intersex woman" is an oxymoron, but I can see that as a rationale for women with hyperandrogenism, which is what the policy addresses. I don't know that I'd want any limits on such women myself. But, we're talking about transgender women.

GrandizerII · March 6, 2018 at 8:17 pm

(March 6, 2018 at 1:04 pm)alpha male Wrote:
(March 6, 2018 at 11:54 am)Grandizer Wrote: As for this, note the lower boundary for normal male range:

Unless you measure it in the evening. Then it's 6.7:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15476527

Quote:Perhaps the rationale then is that it would be unfair for, say, intersex women who happen to have relatively high testosterone levels and yet still be below the male range to be moved to compete against men instead. Thus, 10's the limit.

"Intersex woman" is an oxymoron, but I can see that as a rationale for women with hyperandrogenism, which is what the policy addresses. I don't know that I'd want any limits on such women myself. But, we're talking about transgender women.

Transgendered women are still women. These rules apply to women with relatively high levels of testosterone compared to the average woman. And "intersex woman" isn't an oxymoron when "woman" is defined in the gender sense.

~~John V~~ · March 7, 2018 at 6:44 am

(March 6, 2018 at 8:17 pm)Grandizer Wrote: Transgendered women are still women. These rules apply to women with relatively high levels of testosterone compared to the average woman. And "intersex woman" isn't an oxymoron when "woman" is defined in the gender sense.

Presumably by your standards a transgender woman is a woman solely on declaration. Do you think such women should be able to compete as women, despite having done no hormone therapy toward transition?

GrandizerII · March 7, 2018 at 7:29 am

(March 7, 2018 at 6:44 am)alpha male Wrote:
(March 6, 2018 at 8:17 pm)Grandizer Wrote: Transgendered women are still women. These rules apply to women with relatively high levels of testosterone compared to the average woman. And "intersex woman" isn't an oxymoron when "woman" is defined in the gender sense.

Presumably by your standards a transgender woman is a woman solely on declaration. Do you think such women should be able to compete as women, despite having done no hormone therapy toward transition?

As long as their testosterone levels are below the normal male range, then what's the problem?

~~John V~~ · March 7, 2018 at 8:41 am

(March 7, 2018 at 7:29 am)Grandizer Wrote: As long as their testosterone levels are below the normal male range, then what's the problem?

First, that's not what I asked. If a man declares that he's a woman, I presume that by your standards, she is at that moment. Should she be allowed to compete with women at that point? If not, why not?

Second, why would you define female as not male? Why not say that a trans woman must be within the female range, rather than outside the male range?

**The Grand Nudger** · (This post was last modified: March 7, 2018 at 8:52 am by The Grand Nudger.)

Angling for some diversion about social outrage? Meh. I doubt that it matters much, particularly to some league or association, whether or not someone declares as male or female. I declare as male and I still don't get to hop into the olympics-for-boy babys. Them not accepting me doesn't make me less of a man, nor would it make any trans woman less of a woman.

I just don't meet their criteria for admission. Cogent regulation will always exclude someone. What's the problem?

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Trans women banned from world chess	LinuxGal	37	4269	October 15, 2023 at 10:10 pm Last Post: LinuxGal
	Women's Rights	Lek	314	29782	April 25, 2023 at 5:22 am Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
	That pro white thread.	TheClearCleanStuff	161	28069	May 5, 2022 at 9:18 am Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	[Serious] G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons	WinterHold	47	3720	September 23, 2020 at 6:26 am Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	Damned Women	BrianSoddingBoru4	26	3052	December 19, 2019 at 6:00 am Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
	Another liberal using women	John V	38	5463	October 19, 2018 at 7:47 am Last Post: John V
	California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.	brewer	49	6125	October 11, 2018 at 4:54 pm Last Post: Dr H
	BREAKING: Saudi Women Driving, it is now official	WinterHold	10	1738	June 24, 2018 at 9:10 pm Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
	Why Doesn't The Pro-Birth Crowd Address This?	Minimalist	11	1485	June 1, 2018 at 10:58 am Last Post: CapnAwesome
	New Iowa Law Restricts Abortion To Before Most Women Know They're Pregnant	The Industrial Atheist	164	31562	May 20, 2018 at 3:33 pm Last Post: Amarok