Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 3, 2024, 4:53 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
#11
RE: Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
(March 11, 2018 at 9:20 pm)Chad32 Wrote:
(March 11, 2018 at 8:11 pm)Tiberius Wrote: PETA are a bit like Greenpeace. I’m sure both organizations started out with good intentions, but the most radical members have taken over and now PETA kills thousands of animals in their shelters (which is necessary but hypocritical) and Greenpeace are anti-GMO eco-terrorists.

Why is it necessary to kill animals in the shelters? Too expensive to just neuter and raise them to old age?

There are just too many, and they can't just let the population overfill the kennel(s). We rescued a dog (beagle-dachshund mix- a real sweetheart) recently. I couldn't believe how many pit bulls were in there. People have all these ideas that don't pan out.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Reply
#12
RE: Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
That's pretty sad.
Poe's Law: "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of Fundamentalism that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing."

10 Christ-like figures that predate Jesus. Link shortened to Chris ate Jesus for some reason...
http://listverse.com/2009/04/13/10-chris...ate-jesus/

Good video to watch, if you want to know how common the Jesus story really is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88GTUXvp-50

A list of biblical contradictions from the infallible word of Yahweh.
http://infidels.org/library/modern/jim_m...tions.html

Reply
#13
RE: Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
(March 11, 2018 at 9:20 pm)TChad32 Wrote:
(March 11, 2018 at 8:11 pm)Tiberius Wrote: PETA are a bit like Greenpeace. I’m sure both organizations started out with good intentions, but the most radical members have taken over and now PETA kills thousands of animals in their shelters (which is necessary but hypocritical) and Greenpeace are anti-GMO eco-terrorists.

Why is it necessary to kill animals in the shelters? Too expensive to just neuter and raise them to old age?

Pretty much. That and space. Also I suspect PETA are “against” neutering as well. So it would be more hypocrisy. Most shelters kill animals, and the “no-kill” shelters have caveats and kill animals too. Unfortunately killing animals in shelters is a necessity. Some are too ill, some are too aggressive and can’t be retrained, some just have no hope of being adopted.
Reply
#14
RE: Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
(March 11, 2018 at 9:35 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(March 11, 2018 at 9:20 pm)TChad32 Wrote: Why is it necessary to kill animals in the shelters? Too expensive to just neuter and raise them to old age?

Pretty much. That and space. Also I suspect PETA are “against” neutering as well. So it would be more hypocrisy. Most shelters kill animals, and the “no-kill” shelters have caveats and kill animals too. Unfortunately killing animals in shelters is a necessity. Some are too ill, some are too aggressive and can’t be retrained, some just have no hope of being adopted.

Yup, and as much as I don't like chihuahuas, there was this little guy in there who just sat there with the whites of his eyes showing in fear. There must have been 15 pit bulls in there, barking like mad dogs. My heart went out to him, but I can't just adopt every dog. I hope he found a good home.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Reply
#15
RE: Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
(March 11, 2018 at 9:35 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Pretty much. That and space. Also I suspect PETA are “against” neutering as well. So it would be more hypocrisy. Most shelters kill animals, and the “no-kill” shelters have caveats and kill animals too. Unfortunately killing animals in shelters is a necessity. Some are too ill, some are too aggressive and can’t be retrained, some just have no hope of being adopted.

Yea, we support a "no kill" shelter and it's more like "try not to kill". We know their turn over can't all be explained by adoption plus natural death. 

Just like "rescue" is often "retail rescue". Businesses buy the dogs and say that they are "saving" them and then turn around and sell them for a profit. All this does is provide incentive for puppy mills.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#16
RE: Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
and then we have crazy cat ladies with 20, 50 or even 200 cats . . . .

[shudder]
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#17
RE: Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
(March 11, 2018 at 9:35 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(March 11, 2018 at 9:20 pm)TChad32 Wrote: Why is it necessary to kill animals in the shelters? Too expensive to just neuter and raise them to old age?

Pretty much. That and space. Also I suspect PETA are “against” neutering as well. So it would be more hypocrisy. Most shelters kill animals, and the “no-kill” shelters have caveats and kill animals too. Unfortunately killing animals in shelters is a necessity. Some are too ill, some are too aggressive and can’t be retrained, some just have no hope of being adopted.

This. I do volunteer work with the Humane Society, and there simply isn't room to house all the homeless animals. Plus that, as Tibs said, some animals are aggressive toward humans. These animals cannot ethically be placed on the adoption market and so have to be put down. Most shelters are basically there to provide food and shelter for animals until they can be returned to their owners or adopted out. They are not homes for animals that don't have them.

Groups like PETA are more about advocacy than animal welfare. At least, that's my opinion...
Reply
#18
RE: Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
(March 12, 2018 at 12:47 am)vorlon13 Wrote: and then we have crazy cat ladies with 20, 50 or even 200 cats . . . .

[shudder]

But under that amount is ok right? 

I mean, you can still live with 19 cats and not be crazy right?

Asking for a friend.
Reply
#19
RE: Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
I have 2. I find them to be a handful.
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#20
RE: Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
(March 11, 2018 at 9:35 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(March 11, 2018 at 9:20 pm)TChad32 Wrote: Why is it necessary to kill animals in the shelters? Too expensive to just neuter and raise them to old age?

Pretty much. That and space. Also I suspect PETA are “against” neutering as well. So it would be more hypocrisy. Most shelters kill animals, and the “no-kill” shelters have caveats and kill animals too. Unfortunately killing animals in shelters is a necessity. Some are too ill, some are too aggressive and can’t be retrained, some just have no hope of being adopted.
They're huge supporters of spaying and neutering our pets.  They contend, and rightly so, that comprehensive reproductive control would reduce the practical requirement to kill sheltered animals by simply reducing the number of animals in question.
(as well as the number of animals that starve, get hit by cars, don;t receive adequate medical or just general care, etc)

They're onerous little shits on so many counts..but not this one. Wink

@Greenpeace earlier. I read a great article by Patrick Moore (I'll look for it)...and I have to say that I'd have loved to have been a part of greenpeace at the begining..but a creeping sense of frustration calcified the organization into what it is today.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How To Poison Yourself By Protecting Yourself From Something That Isn't Poisonous BrianSoddingBoru4 4 501 December 18, 2021 at 11:58 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  It doesn't matter what you think Pope. Brian37 21 1939 April 5, 2021 at 9:26 am
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  We Need Better Leaders BrianSoddingBoru4 9 1088 January 17, 2019 at 3:43 am
Last Post: Aoi Magi
  Abortion Stats - Something doesn't add up. Minimalist 15 1861 November 23, 2018 at 1:29 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  I Knew Democrats Were Better! Minimalist 4 1041 November 17, 2018 at 9:48 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Something They'll Never Say About The WLB! Minimalist 3 570 August 26, 2018 at 9:26 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  The Fucking Moron Just Doesn't Know Anything Minimalist 9 1430 June 8, 2018 at 3:58 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Roseanne tweets better than Trump brewer 89 12696 June 6, 2018 at 9:10 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Tell Us Something We Don't Know Minimalist 14 1596 June 1, 2018 at 11:26 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why Doesn't The Pro-Birth Crowd Address This? Minimalist 11 1455 June 1, 2018 at 10:58 am
Last Post: CapnAwesome



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)