(March 15, 2018 at 10:13 am)Huggy74 Wrote: No Need to fix it, I'm saying is I'll address that issue once it's clear we are past the whole Odin debacle.

But if you fix the issue of conflating evolution of a language with the predominant religion of a region where the language is used then it will also destroy your Odin argument.

(March 15, 2018 at 10:20 am)Mathilda Wrote:

(March 15, 2018 at 10:13 am)Huggy74 Wrote: No Need to fix it, I'm saying is I'll address that issue once it's clear we are past the whole Odin debacle.

But if you fix the issue of conflating evolution of a language with the predominant religion of a region where the language is used then it will also destroy your Odin argument.

No it won't.

(March 15, 2018 at 10:22 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(March 15, 2018 at 10:20 am)Mathilda Wrote: But if you fix the issue of conflating evolution of a language with the predominant religion of a region where the language is used then it will also destroy your Odin argument.

No it won't.

Well we won't know that until you tell us so it's not worth moving on from the Odin argument until you do.

(March 15, 2018 at 10:31 am)Mathilda Wrote:

(March 15, 2018 at 10:22 am)Huggy74 Wrote: No it won't.

Well we won't know that until you tell us so it's not worth moving on from the Odin argument until you do.

I traced the German language back to Akkadian (the language used in ancient Babylon), which is an east Semitic language, Hebrew however is a west Semitic language.

Therefore, Hebrew did not evolve from Akkadian...

(March 15, 2018 at 10:37 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(March 15, 2018 at 10:31 am)Mathilda Wrote: Well we won't know that until you tell us so it's not worth moving on from the Odin argument until you do.

I traced the German language back to Akkadian (the language used in ancient Babylon), which is an east Semitic language, Hebrew however is a west Semitic language.

Therefore, Hebrew did not evolve from Akkadian...

Already countered and ignored by you ...

(March 11, 2018 at 3:41 pm)Mathilda Wrote: You may think that it stands to reason, but that's not the same thing as stating for sure that Odin came from Pagan Baylonian religions. After all, with all those different cultures, there may well have been different religions that died out and were replaced with something entirely new, or imported from another country.

For example take England. The English language has a very long history but there have been multiple religions in England while the language has evolved, including the late arrival of Christianity. And if right wing nuts are to be believed then this is to be pushed out by Islam.

So by your logic Jesus was derived from Odin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_English

(March 15, 2018 at 10:42 am)Mathilda Wrote:

(March 15, 2018 at 10:37 am)Huggy74 Wrote: I traced the German language back to Akkadian (the language used in ancient Babylon), which is an east Semitic language, Hebrew however is a west Semitic language.

Therefore, Hebrew did not evolve from Akkadian...

Already countered and ignored by you ...

(March 11, 2018 at 3:41 pm)Mathilda Wrote: You may think that it stands to reason, but that's not the same thing as stating for sure that Odin came from Pagan Baylonian religions. After all, with all those different cultures, there may well have been different religions that died out and were replaced with something entirely new, or imported from another country.

For example take England. The English language has a very long history but there have been multiple religions in England while the language has evolved, including the late arrival of Christianity. And if right wing nuts are to be believed then this is to be pushed out by Islam.

So by your logic Jesus was derived from Odin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_English

You countered me with what exactly? Disagreeing with what I said is not a counter, you must present facts that support your point of view.

(March 15, 2018 at 8:50 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Since you guys lost the Odin argument (evidence overwhelmingly points to Odin being a derivative of Babylonian mythology), Are we ready to continue with this argument?

So far I haven't seen anyone submit evidence against the true God.

Are you... kidding me? Lmao. How selective do you have to be to not realize that YAHWEH AND A LARGE PORTION OF THE IT IS DERRIVATIVE OF THE SAME MYTHOLOGY. The religions literally developed in the same region. Gilgamesh and Noah have the same story arc! The flood story is identical! My god, man!

(March 15, 2018 at 10:57 am)Aegon Wrote:

(March 15, 2018 at 8:50 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Since you guys lost the Odin argument (evidence overwhelmingly points to Odin being a derivative of Babylonian mythology), Are we ready to continue with this argument?

So far I haven't seen anyone submit evidence against the true God.

Are you... kidding me? Lmao. How selective do you have to be to not realize that YAHWEH AND A LARGE PORTION OF THE IT IS DERRIVATIVE OF THE SAME MYTHOLOGY. The religions literally developed in the same region. Gilgamesh and Noah have the same story arc! The flood story is identical! My god, man!

So basically what you're saying is that a Monotheistic religion that strictly prohibits the worship of Idols is derived from a Polytheistic pantheon of over 40 different gods, and not the other way around? And that Gilgamesh can in no way be derived from story of Noah?

Like I said, present your evidence.

(March 15, 2018 at 10:53 am)Huggy74 Wrote: You countered me with what exactly? Disagreeing with what I said is not a counter, you must present facts that support your point of view.

So you have no way of arguing with the possibility that during the time the German language evolved there may well have been different religions that died out and were replaced with something entirely new, or imported from another country.

I seriously cannot believe that you are demanding that I provide evidence that a language and a god are not the same thing.