(April 8, 2018 at 1:21 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Nope... I don’t agree with that.

Nvm, edit:


Okay. 👍

(April 8, 2018 at 1:29 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:

(April 8, 2018 at 1:21 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Nope... I don’t agree with that.

You’re welcome to clarify but I know you won’t, because you rarely ever do. 

Road: “Strawman!”

Interlocutor: “Then what is your position?”

Road: “Eh, I don’t feel like talking about it.”


If you don’t correct me, I’ll just assume I’m right and you’re only objecting because you don’t want others to know it. 😉

Which is ironic for someone who always demands other people "state their position " or "be clear"

(April 8, 2018 at 1:29 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:

(April 8, 2018 at 1:21 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Nope... I don’t agree with that.

You’re welcome to clarify but I know you won’t, because you rarely ever do. 

Road: “Strawman!”

Interlocutor: “Then what is your position?”

Road: “Eh, I don’t feel like talking about it.”


If you don’t correct me, I’ll just assume I’m right and you’re only objecting because you don’t want others to know it. 😉

You pull this crap every time, you stick your foot in your mouth and make statements for others, when you don't have squat as a basis for that assessment. 

I would disagree; not having sex, is a very good preventative measure against having an unwanted pregnancy (as well as getting unwanted STD's).  I think that the research as well as common sense would back me up on this.  It's not just "rhetoric" it is the truth (whether you like it or not).   It does not however; work after the fact (and I never said anything to imply such).  I think that would then be the time, to be supportive and to help them as best you can.  They have to deal with a consequence of their actions, but that doesn't mean that we don't support them.  

There may be a number of reasons, why I don't answer.  I may feel that you are trying to pull us off topic, or I may not wish to defend, something which I never said, I may not have time, to go into detail at the moment.  However, this kind of manipulative, drama queen bullshit, doesn't incline me to want to answer you.  Why can't we just have a discussion, where you speak for yourself, and I'll speak for me.  We'll discuss ideas and leave the ad hominem attacks out of it.

(April 8, 2018 at 2:16 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:

(April 8, 2018 at 1:29 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: You’re welcome to clarify but I know you won’t, because you rarely ever do. 

Road: “Strawman!”

Interlocutor: “Then what is your position?”

Road: “Eh, I don’t feel like talking about it.”


If you don’t correct me, I’ll just assume I’m right and you’re only objecting because you don’t want others to know it. 😉

You pull this crap every time, you stick your foot in your mouth and make statements for others, when you don't have squat as a basis for that assessment. 

I would disagree; not having sex, is a very good preventative measure against having an unwanted pregnancy (as well as getting unwanted STD's).  Ithink that the research as well as common sense would back me up on this.  It's not just "rhetoric" it is the truth (whether you like it or not).  It does not however; work after the fact (and I never said anything to imply such).  I think that would then be the time, to be supportive and to help them as best you can. They have to deal with a consequence of their actions, but that doesn't mean that we don't support them.  

There may be a number of reasons, why I don't answer.  I may feel that you are trying to pull us off topic, or I may not wish to defend, something which I never said, I may not have time, to go into detail at the moment.  However, this kind of manipulative, drama queen bullshit, doesn't incline me to want to answer you.  Why can't we just have a discussion, where you speak for yourself, and I'll speak for me.  We'll discuss ideas and leave the ad hominem attacks out of it.

 What do you expect me to do when your only response is, ‘no, I don’t agree,’ other than ask as you to clarify? I edited my post anyway.  And no. Preaching abstinence does nothing to stop people from having sex and is an ineffective method for preventing unwanted pregnancies. Especially for our young people:

http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/publica...y-programs

Has not having sex ever worked?

I mean there are nearly 7 billion H.S.S.

Sin must be rampant.

I blame the gayz for our overpopulation.

No methods work if they are not implemented.

The REALITY is people will have sex. Always have always will. There is nothing ANYONE, including you, can do about it.
Stating your disapproval accomplishes nothing. Wait, check that. It accomplishes LESS than nothing.

Remember:

Abstinence makes the church grow fondlers.

(April 8, 2018 at 3:04 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: No methods work if they are not implemented.

Abstinence is an unfair and unrealistic “method” that does not, and never will translate to the real world no matter how badly you wish it so.  The data plainly reflect that.  Clearly, even your boy Alpha had a problem implementing it.

Quote:No methods work if they are not implemented.

It has been implemented and it's already failed. Short of creating a sexual police state . The policy will fail . Kids are going to be horny and  screw and no amount of moralizing has or ever will stop that . And abortion will never go away even if you make it illegal . It's already been illegal that failed and will always fail .