Yup accept CL i respect her . 

But , Beta , Wooter , Ahole , Little Dick , Huggies ,Road, I stopped taking them seriously ages ago .

---

(May 2, 2018 at 9:02 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(May 2, 2018 at 5:50 am)Wololo Wrote: Firstly I'd like to point out that the proposed debate topic sounds more like an item on a committee meeting agenda than a debate topic.

Secondly I'd like to point out that there's going to be a vast disconnect between Wooter's conception of his role here and his actilual role, vis Wooters "my role is to prove how stupid and misguided atheists are through my superior intellect and Thomas Aquinas".  The rest of us "superior intellect? Ha! Your role is butt-monkey".

Why not wait for what he actually says rather than making something up in your head and criticising a strawman?

To be fair he kind of already has all but said this or at the very least implied it .

Whoops wrong thread!

(May 1, 2018 at 11:37 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(May 1, 2018 at 10:27 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: We'll have to select a moderator. Maybe some mod will volunteer.

I vote Vulcan for our moderator. If he would agree, and if no mod volunteers I guess.

I don't know if just anyone. can moderate. Maybe they can.

I'd like to say that I find the idea of any group of people here having a "role" (besides the mods) rather creepy. Maybe it's more about how to conduct yourself on an atheist forum? Or a study of the behaviour of these creatures outside their natural habitat?

Seems to me that a thread like this would/could just turn into a place for passive-aggressiveness or whatever the opposite of that is; passive-showing off: "I am the greatest, nobody disagrees with me [because they can't], therefore it is true". I'm all for a good social experiment to ...just so long as all participants know that whatever they assume the gagged atheists are thinking in response to reading a given statement... probably isn't what we actually are

(May 2, 2018 at 9:22 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:

(May 1, 2018 at 11:37 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I vote Vulcan for our moderator. If he would agree, and if no mod volunteers I guess.

I don't know if just anyone. can moderate. Maybe they can.

What about having signup threads for a specific topic? Every day people vote for who is more uncivil and that person is removed from the thread?

Joking aside your idea of signups for serious topics doesn't sound bad at all to me, except for the lack of lynches :-P

(May 1, 2018 at 11:37 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(May 1, 2018 at 10:27 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: We'll have to select a moderator. Maybe some mod will volunteer.

I vote Vulcan for our moderator. If he would agree, and if no mod volunteers I guess.

How about Tibs?

(May 1, 2018 at 11:38 pm)Losty Wrote:

(May 1, 2018 at 11:35 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: What is funny?

A Christian debating a Christian on atheist forums lol 😂😂

It guarantees there will be at least one debate on AF.org won by a Christian.  

(May 2, 2018 at 4:38 pm)Whateverist Wrote:

(May 1, 2018 at 11:38 pm)Losty Wrote: A Christian debating a Christian on atheist forums lol 😂😂

It guarantees there will be at least one debate on AF.org won by a Christian.  

I could smell the burn all the way over here in California.

(May 2, 2018 at 4:41 pm)Fireball Wrote:

(May 2, 2018 at 4:38 pm)Whateverist Wrote: It guarantees there will be at least one debate on AF.org won by a Christian.  

I could smell the burn all the way over here in California.

Nah it will just result in all the Theists KOing each other .