Login

pocaracas · May 10, 2018 at 11:59 am

(May 10, 2018 at 11:56 am)CDF47 Wrote:
(May 10, 2018 at 11:54 am)pocaracas Wrote: Still no answer to any of these questions. (x2)
It is telling that you cower away from sharing your thought process... if there is any...

It is outside the topic of the OP which states DNA proves design.

We don't care. The mods allow it.
Please, indulge us.

**The Grand Nudger** · (This post was last modified: May 10, 2018 at 12:10 pm by The Grand Nudger.)

(May 10, 2018 at 11:59 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:
CDF47 Wrote:You are a sad people on this site.

Not as sad as someone who loudly proclaims that he can't possibly be wrong and anyone who disagrees with him shouldn't be working in the field of DNA research, which is close to 100% of people actually researching the nature of DNA. It's a good thing molecular biologists have mechanical engineers to 'ID-splain' their own work to them.

LOL, don;t besmirch the honorable name of mechanical engineering. Those engineers are minority loons in their own right. Wink

It wouldn;t be possible for a person to understand system design at a professional level without simultaneously being aware of why the ID argument is fundamentally flawed. They may still believe in ID, sure......but they know the shortcomings of the position from an evidentiary standpoint, as do the proponents of id. This much has been attested to -by- those proponents under oath and in the public record.

pocaracas · May 10, 2018 at 12:03 pm

(May 10, 2018 at 12:02 pm)Khemikal Wrote:
(May 10, 2018 at 11:59 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Not as sad as someone who loudly proclaims that he can't possibly be wrong and anyone who disagrees with him shouldn't be working in the field of DNA research, which is close to 100% of people actually researching the nature of DNA. It's a good thing molecular biologists have mechanical engineers to 'ID-splain' their own work to them.

LOL, don;t besmirch the honorable name of mechanical engineering. Those engineers are minority loons in their own right.

I knew I'd gotten the wrong degree... .Physics engineering.... who the hell wants that?! Mechanical engineering is where it's at!

CDF47 · May 10, 2018 at 12:04 pm

(May 10, 2018 at 11:59 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:
CDF47 Wrote:You are a sad people on this site.

Not as sad as someone who loudly proclaims that he can't possibly be wrong and anyone who disagrees with him shouldn't be working in the field of DNA research, which is close to 100% of people actually researching the nature of DNA. It's a good thing molecular biologists have mechanical engineers to 'ID-splain' their own work to them.

The study of ID requires a multi-disciplinary team including bio-chemists, cosmologists, engineers,....

**The Grand Nudger** · (This post was last modified: May 10, 2018 at 12:06 pm by The Grand Nudger.)

No it doesn;t. All you need is magic book.

CDF47 · May 10, 2018 at 12:07 pm

(May 10, 2018 at 12:06 pm)Khemikal Wrote: No it doesn;t. All you need is magic book.

ID and theology are separate topics although ID has religious implications as I have stated prior.

**Mister Agenda** · (This post was last modified: May 10, 2018 at 12:09 pm by Mister Agenda.)

Khemikal Wrote:
Mister Agenda Wrote:Not as sad as someone who loudly proclaims that he can't possibly be wrong and anyone who disagrees with him shouldn't be working in the field of DNA research, which is close to 100% of people actually researching the nature of DNA. It's a good thing molecular biologists have mechanical engineers to 'ID-splain' their own work to them.

LOL, don;t besmirch the honorable name of mechanical engineering. Those engineers are minority loons in their own right.

It wouldn;t be possible for a person to understand system design at a professional level without simultaneously being aware of why the ID argument is fundamentally flawed. They may still believe in ID, sure......but they know the shortcomings of the position from an evidentiary standpoint, as do the proponents of id. This much has been attested to -by- those proponents under oath and in the public record.

I agree, most engineers are quite creditable, but it's hard not to notice how many appear on lists of 'scientists who disagree with evolution' or some such. I imagine even most engineers who are creationists aren't arrogant enough to think they know molecular biology better than molecular biologists, though.

CDF47 · May 10, 2018 at 12:10 pm

(May 10, 2018 at 12:08 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:
Khemikal Wrote:LOL, don;t besmirch the honorable name of mechanical engineering. Those engineers are minority loons in their own right.

It wouldn;t be possible for a person to understand system design at a professional level without simultaneously being aware of why the ID argument is fundamentally flawed. They may still believe in ID, sure......but they know the shortcomings of the position from an evidentiary standpoint, as do the proponents of id. This much has been attested to -by- those proponents under oath and in the public record.

I agree, most engineers are quite creditable, but it's hard not to notice how many appear on lists of 'scientists who disagree with evolution' or some such. I imagine even most engineers who are creationists aren't arrogant enough to think they know molecular biology better than molecular biologists, though.

I know design better is all I am saying.

**Mister Agenda** · (This post was last modified: May 10, 2018 at 12:12 pm by Mister Agenda.)

CDF47 Wrote:
Mister Agenda Wrote:Not as sad as someone who loudly proclaims that he can't possibly be wrong and anyone who disagrees with him shouldn't be working in the field of DNA research, which is close to 100% of people actually researching the nature of DNA. It's a good thing molecular biologists have mechanical engineers to 'ID-splain' their own work to them.

The study of ID requires a multi-disciplinary team including bio-chemists, cosmologists, engineers,....

Qualifications don't matter when the object of investigation is imaginary.

CDF47 Wrote:I know design better is all I am saying.

They know biology, organic chemistry, and DNA better is all I am saying.

**The Grand Nudger** · (This post was last modified: May 10, 2018 at 12:14 pm by The Grand Nudger.)

(May 10, 2018 at 11:34 am)Khemikal Wrote:
(May 8, 2018 at 2:25 am)CDF47 Wrote: I said the entire universe is designed which is why even a dumb rock requires design

(May 10, 2018 at 11:16 am)CDF47 Wrote:
A rock does not show specified complexity so it is not designed

Which one of these two assholes is right?

(May 10, 2018 at 12:10 pm)CDF47 Wrote: I know design better is all I am saying.

Do you, though?

(May 10, 2018 at 12:07 pm)CDF47 Wrote:
(May 10, 2018 at 12:06 pm)Khemikal Wrote: No it doesn;t. All you need is magic book.

ID and theology are separate topics although ID has religious implications as I have stated prior.

No, they're not.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Spontaneous assembly of DNA from precursor molecules prior to life.	Anomalocaris	4	1193	April 4, 2019 at 6:12 pm Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
	Music and DNA	tahaadi	4	1587	September 29, 2018 at 4:35 am Last Post: Pat Mustard
	Dr. Long proves life after death or no?	Manga	27	8214	April 27, 2017 at 4:59 pm Last Post: Amarok
	"DNA Labelling!" aka American Idiots	Davka	28	8508	February 4, 2015 at 1:45 am Last Post: Aractus
	A new atheist's theories on meta-like physical existence	freedeepthink	14	4302	October 1, 2014 at 1:35 am Last Post: freedeepthink
	Do the multiverse theories prove the existence of...	Mudhammam	3	2355	January 12, 2014 at 12:03 pm Last Post: Esquilax
	Yeti DNA sequenced	Doubting Thomas	2	1564	October 17, 2013 at 7:17 pm Last Post: Minimalist
	Science Proves God	Pahu	3	2138	August 2, 2012 at 4:54 pm Last Post: Jackalope
	New Human DNA Strain Detected	Minimalist	10	5386	July 27, 2012 at 7:24 pm Last Post: popeyespappy
	Junk DNA and creationism	little_monkey	0	2081	December 3, 2011 at 9:23 am Last Post: little_monkey