(August 10, 2018 at 1:16 pm)Khemikal Wrote:

(August 10, 2018 at 12:58 pm)alpha male Wrote: I've seen you tangle with Shell, and seen her also call out your bullshit sophistry.

If you're saying that all the people who voted for Hillary are immoral, then fair enough.

Seems pretty stupid though. If all the moral people abstain, then the immoral people get to make the decisions. Go figure.

Just a few posts back you loved it....see, short memory.

Of course I love it. If my opponent in a chess game makes a stupid play that costs him a piece, I love it.

If he just doesn't show up and forfeits, that's even better! 

Oh just make up your mind for fucks sake, lol.

Are you really so proud to set yourself in opposition to moral people?

(August 10, 2018 at 1:12 pm)alpha male Wrote:

(August 10, 2018 at 1:09 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: She has used her position to rail against the press ok so perhaps abuse of power was a bit much for her. 
It was her defence of Trumps abuses of power and lies that they complain against.

That's just her job.

Yes, and Eichmann was just a good and effective administrator. 

People of principle have a choice in these matters. Sanders, like her old man, has demonstrated repeatedly that she lacks principles.

(August 10, 2018 at 1:22 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Oh just make up your mind for fucks sake, lol.

Are you really so proud to set yourself in opposition to moral people?

I don't agree with you on the morality, silly. I was taking your POV to show a fault in your position. Pretty sure that was obvious....

---

(August 10, 2018 at 1:23 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: Yes, and Eichmann was just a good and effective administrator. 

If you really feel this is an applicable comparison, you should be advocating killing her.

If not, you should refrain from such inflammatory remarks, as some people miss the hyperbole and act on it.

Quote:People of principle have a choice in these matters. Sanders, like her old man, has demonstrated repeatedly that she lacks principles.

In America, people of principle generally remain civil, and count on elections to correct matters in due time.

I suppose I'd worry about it more if all the "moral people" voting meant that moral people got to make decisions..but if all of your favorite whataboutisms are true..that's not really an option.

Regardless, this doesn't explain why a person would vote for a racist and then pretend he isn't a racist, or why you would be so pleased that the "oither side" you're constantly titling at didn't get the votes of others.  You are pleased that your racist won an election.  Because what are the rules, and how does it work, and you're tired of being white genocided...and on and on and on with your ridiculous list of greivances. It doesn't actually take a card carrying dem to realize how stupid all of this is. So you might want to invest in some other explanation for why people call bullshit..on your bullshit.

The decay of the republican party is truly breathtaking.

(August 10, 2018 at 1:26 pm)alpha male Wrote:

(August 10, 2018 at 1:22 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Oh just make up your mind for fucks sake, lol.

Are you really so proud to set yourself in opposition to moral people?

I don't agree with you on the morality, silly. I was taking your POV to show a fault in your position. Pretty sure that was obvious....

---

(August 10, 2018 at 1:23 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: Yes, and Eichmann was just a good and effective administrator. 

If you really feel this is an applicable comparison, you should be advocating killing her.

If not, you should refrain from such inflammatory remarks, as some people miss the hyperbole and act on it.

Quote:People of principle have a choice in these matters. Sanders, like her old man, has demonstrated repeatedly that she lacks principles.

In America, people of principle generally remain civil, and count on elections to correct matters in due time.

Christ, you're thick.

Your defense of her loathsome behavior was essentially the same that Eichmann offered at trial. "Just doing one's job" doesn't cut it.

(August 10, 2018 at 1:43 pm)Khemikal Wrote: I suppose I'd worry about it more if all the "moral people" voting meant that moral people got to make decisions..but if all of your favorite whataboutisms are true..that's not really an option.

Yep, in the real world, sometimes none of the options look very good. Refusing to make a decision, then bitching at the people who did, doesn't seem very mature to me.

Quote:Regardless, this doesn't explain why a person would vote for a racist and then pretend he isn't a racist, or why you would be so pleased that the "oither side" you're constantly titling at didn't get the votes of others.

Hmm... The other side favors policies which I feel are not in the best interest of myself and/or the country. If they're in power, they get to implement those policies. So, I'm happy when they don't get votes.

The real question is, why do you bother trying to obfuscate with such disingenuous comments.

Oh yeah, that's because you're a cheap sophist.

Quote:You are pleased that your racist won an election.

Yes, better the racist with policies closer to my views, than the racist with policies further from my views.

Quote:Because what are the rules, and how does it work, and you're tired of being white genocided...and on and on and on with your ridiculous list of greivances.

LMAO - when did I claim I was being white genocided? I've said multiple times on these boards that I have white middle-class US male privilege.

Quote:It doesn't actually take a card carrying dem to realize how stupid all of this is.  So you might want to invest in some other explanation for why people call bullshit..on your bullshit.

As I said, if you're also saying that people who voted for Hillary are stupid and immoral, then fair enough.

Quote:The decay of the republican party is truly breathtaking.

But there you go and limit it to Republicans. The Dems put up a racist too. You say you're an equal opportunity hater. But really, you're not.

---

(August 10, 2018 at 1:45 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: Christ, you're thick.

Your defense of her loathsome behavior was essentially the same that Eichmann offered at trial. "Just doing one's job" doesn't cut it.

Again, if you really feel that this administration is comparable to Hitler's, shouldn't you own it and advocate violent overthrow?

(August 10, 2018 at 2:04 pm)alpha male Wrote:

---

(August 10, 2018 at 1:45 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: Christ, you're thick.

Your defense of her loathsome behavior was essentially the same that Eichmann offered at trial. "Just doing one's job" doesn't cut it.

Again, if you really feel that this administration is comparable to Hitler's, shouldn't you own it and advocate violent overthrow?

Again, if you won't (or can't) read for context, that's really not my problem. The post was directed at your lame defense of her actions. I'm not comparing her to Eichmann, you water head.

But rest assured, if these bumbling fools ever manage to reach Hitlerian levels of evil, I will advocate violent overthrow.

(August 10, 2018 at 2:04 pm)alpha male Wrote: Yes, better the racist with policies closer to my views, than the racist with policies further from my views.

There, see, was that so hard?  I'm extremely impressed that you've managed to finally own this. It only took you what, two years?

(August 10, 2018 at 2:15 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: Again, if you won't (or can't) read for context, that's really not my problem. The post was directed at your lame defense of her actions.

She's doing her job. That's neither lame, nor really a defense. It's a statement of fact. There's nothing to defend, as you haven't made any explicit charges.

What's this ambiguous loathsome behavior?

Quote:I'm not comparing her to Eichmann, you water head.

Actually, yeah, you did.