Wtf are you going on about Huggy? How is that relevant?

(August 28, 2018 at 12:35 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Wtf are you going on about  Huggy? How is that relevant?

There are animals that are capable of seeing up to at least 4 primary colors.

My question to you is; can you name a fourth primary color?

It's relevant because you stated we could detect primary colors using devices... so name a fourth primary color... got it?

-thread

(August 28, 2018 at 12:42 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(August 28, 2018 at 12:35 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Wtf are you going on about  Huggy? How is that relevant?

There are animals that are capable of seeing up to at least 4 primary colors.

My question to you is; can you name a fourth primary color?

It's relevant because you stated we could detect primary colors using devices... so name  a fourth primary color... got it?

The name of the forth primary color is, quite remarkably, “the forth primary color”.    It is actually not trivial to fathom just how dumb you must be to either think:

1. This really is a meaningful question, OR

2. This can possible be an effective bluster.

You can call it wazoo if you want.  In real life, what you call it doesn’t matter.  Whether you know it’s attributes, does.  If you are tetrachromatic, your eyes can directly help, but not much. But whether you are tetrachromatic, trichromatic, or totally color blind, devices can always help, a lot.

Got it?

The forth primary color is in all ways identical to the other three, except it reflect a forth wavelength to which the retinal cells of some animals (and very few humans) also exhibit a sensitivity peak.   Most mammals with color vision have retinal cells exhibiting peak sensitivity only at 2 or 3 different wave lengths.

You do realize the three primary colors aren’t the same to all trichromatic humans, that People who read some of the patterns in the colored dots differently from other people at your optometrist’s office are actually seeing slightly different primary colors than other people,  alone other trichromatic animals, right?  Of course not.

Huggy's doing whatever he can to avoid acknowledging the point that there is no physical means of measuring his god unlike everything else known to exist.

(August 28, 2018 at 12:58 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:

(August 28, 2018 at 12:42 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: There are animals that are capable of seeing up to at least 4 primary colors.

My question to you is; can you name a fourth primary color?

It's relevant because you stated we could detect primary colors using devices... so name  a fourth primary color... got it?

The name of the forth primary color is, quite remarkably, “the forth primary color”.    It is actually not trivial to fathom just how dumb you must be to either think:

1. This really is a meaningful question, OR

2. This can possible be an effective bluster.

You can call it wazoo if you want.  In real life, what you call it doesn’t matter.  Whether you know it’s attributes, does.  The forth primary color is in all ways identical to the other three, except it reflect the peak wavelength sensitivity of a forth type of retinal cells.   Most mammals with color vision has only 2 or 3 types.

You do realize the three primary colors aren’t the same to all trichromatic humans, let alone other trichromatic animals, right?  Of course not.

Hence why I said name "a" fourth primary color...

---

(August 28, 2018 at 1:07 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Huggy's doing whatever he can to avoid acknowledging the point that there is no physical means of measuring his god unlike everything else known to exist.

I didn't see the answer to my question...

And whether “a” is substituted for “the” makes 0.00 difference to the meaninglessness of the question, nor the total ineffectiveness of the bluster it sought to embody.

(August 28, 2018 at 11:26 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(August 28, 2018 at 11:23 am)Kit Wrote: By the process of realization.

A god that cannot be proven to exist outside of "personal" experience is not a realization so much as it is a process of self delusion.

So by your definition, anything that exists outside of the boundaries of your five senses doesn't exist?

There are many more than five senses by the way.

But I would say that if something is undetected by any scientific instrumentation then it is at best unproven.

God on the other hand is not only unproven but unlikely.

(August 28, 2018 at 1:09 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(August 28, 2018 at 1:07 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Huggy's doing whatever he can to avoid acknowledging the point that there is no physical means of measuring his god unlike everything else known to exist.

I didn't see the answer to my question...

That's because it's an utterly stupid question, is entirely irrelevant and Anomalocaris has already answered it.

(August 28, 2018 at 12:42 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: It's relevant because you stated we could detect primary colors using devices... so name  a fourth primary color... got it?

I stated that we could detect colours using devices. I did not make an arbitrary distinction of primary colours. You're just trying to avoid acknowledging that there is no way to detect your god.

(August 28, 2018 at 1:34 pm)Mathilda Wrote:

(August 28, 2018 at 1:09 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I didn't see the answer to my question...

That's because it's an utterly stupid question, is entirely irrelevant and Anomalocaris has already answered it.

(August 28, 2018 at 12:42 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: It's relevant because you stated we could detect primary colors using devices... so name  a fourth primary color... got it?

I stated that we could detect colours using devices. I did not make an arbitrary distinction of primary colours. You're just trying to avoid acknowledging that there is no way to detect your god.

No it isn't, it's the exact same question I posed except instead of using "red"  as an example I'm using actual unknown colors...

I asked you if everyone was blind to the color "red" how would you prove it's existence, you stated essentially 'through the use of instrumentation'.

We know that more than 4 primary colors exist, so show me a fourth primary color, shouldn't be too hard since there are devices that can do so as you just stated.

(August 28, 2018 at 1:34 pm)Mathilda Wrote:

(August 28, 2018 at 12:42 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: It's relevant because you stated we could detect primary colors using devices... so name  a fourth primary color... got it?

I stated that we could detect colours using devices. I did not make an arbitrary distinction of primary colours. You're just trying to avoid acknowledging that there is no way to detect your god.

I made the distinction of "primary colors" using the example of the human eye and the color red...