(October 10, 2011 at 2:52 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: You use foul ad hominem to get something across, which isn't a valid point by the way. Like you expect me to accept the ancient greek's behaviour just because Muhammed married a 9 year old?
Or did you think that it'd legitimize it in any way?
Because I don't.

Do you know what words mean? What RJ said wasn't an ad hominem.

(October 10, 2011 at 3:52 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote:

(October 9, 2011 at 4:09 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: I only answer your posts. If you don't have anything to say, then don't.

Fine..thats good and true.

you have now answered my post, and have made very clear what you believe.

Now kindly piss off.

---

(October 10, 2011 at 2:52 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote:

Quote:Sure..just like Mohammed forced a 9 year old girl to marry him.

but at least it was a proper mid-east hetero raping...right?

You are still a jackass.

You use foul ad hominem to get something across, which isn't a valid point by the way. Like you expect me to accept the ancient greek's behaviour just because Muhammed married a 9 year old?
Or did you think that it'd legitimize it in any way?
Because I don't.

Nope..not a single ad-hom in that post.

Fact - Mohammad forced a 9 year old to marry him...therefore rape was involved.

Fact - I never once asked you to accept the ancient greeks behavior, nor did you ever ask me what i thought of them. I personally find their behaviour as revolting as Mohammad's.

Fact - you have shown time and time again that you are a selfish, close-minded, and ruthless Jackass. Even going so far as saying you support Gaddafi.

It is a fact that Muhammed's marriage to Ayshe is not the point.
You thought that it'd somewhat unnerve me, so you brought it up.
Isn't it?
And yes, I support Qaddafi against the the NATO, and their imperialistic motives.
And I do not care if you label me as close minded. Maybe I am. But you think that you're more open minded than I am?
You're as close minded as I am, as you adhere to a single way of thought, and do not go astray from it.

You do add diversity, mehmet, even if your views are antiquated in the extreme.

This doesn't stop them from being out of sync with higher ancient cultures.

(October 10, 2011 at 7:11 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: It is a fact that Muhammed's marriage to Ayshe is not the point.
You thought that it'd somewhat unnerve me, so you brought it up.
Isn't it?

Yeah..sure... whatever makes you happy.

(October 10, 2011 at 7:11 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: And yes, I support Qaddafi against the the NATO, and their imperialistic motives.

Yeah..sure... whatever makes you happy.

Did you ever ask me if I supported Imperialism?

Did you know the topic is "Gay marriage"... not "who supports Imperialism?"

(October 10, 2011 at 7:11 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: And I do not care if you label me as close minded. Maybe I am. But you think that you're more open minded than I am?

I do consider you close minded, but only in light of your previous posts. I never said I was more open minded than you. I merely said you were closed minded.

I am open enough to be changed... but so far all I see is you glorifying millitary power. Yet, at the same time, claiming you are against Imperialism.

That to me is a red flag.

Then again...the topic is "gay marriage", yet you continue to go off topic.

(October 10, 2011 at 7:11 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: You're as close minded as I am, as you adhere to a single way of thought, and do not go astray from it.

You have no idea what the philosophy of Absurdism is do you? You claim I stick to a single way of thought, yet I dispise abortion and prefer it to be legal at the same time. I dispise Islam, yet i am willing to allow it to co-exist with me.

Are you open minded enough to allow something you dispise to co-exist in your world?

Quote:Did you ever ask me if I supported Imperialism?

Did you know the topic is "Gay marriage"... not "who supports Imperialism?"

Yes, but you brought up the issue of Qaddafi.

Quote:I am open enough to be changed... but so far all I see is you glorifying millitary power. Yet, at the same time, claiming you are against Imperialism.

Military is an ageold, beautiful institution. My grandfather, his father and his father, and probably some other people in his family were militarymen of rank.
Well, military is the only thing that keeps you safe against the cluchtes of imperialism, should it's economic chokehold fail.
Yes, my country has and won a battle against western imperialism already.

The battle to install kebab houses down every high street and market street in the UK?

I almost choked on the water I was drinking, 5th.

(October 10, 2011 at 7:41 pm)Epimethean Wrote: You do add diversity, mehmet, even if your views are antiquated in the extreme.

This doesn't stop them from being out of sync with higher ancient cultures.

My views or ideology do not focus on matters like homosexuality, actually.
Nor do they focus on anything that your "modern" views are mostly about.

Quote:The battle to install kebab houses down every high street and market street in the UK?

No. We've managed to drive out the british out of our lands, not to mention their lackeys, the greeks, and their allies the french, who, as usual, moved out on their own.

(October 11, 2011 at 5:43 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: No. We've managed to drive out the british out of our lands, not to mention their lackeys, the greeks, and their allies the french, who, as usual, moved out on their own.

1918-1923 is what you are talking about??

So you are saying that the "Ottomans" were better?

(October 9, 2011 at 4:13 pm)Napoleon Wrote: We do, it's you yanks who can't use the real version of this language.

I have this conversation with ElD now almost every night - you guys say shit that doesn't make a lick of sense. We're speaking the same language but you turn it into a Picasso painting.

So. Gay Marriage. Yeah.

Why are people against it again? I get so confused with these massive threads of repetitive twaddle and throwing antiquated heritage in the mix just puts a layer of gray paint all over everything.