Posts: 16929
Threads: 129
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: FB bans 'dangerous' individuals
May 9, 2019 at 8:11 pm
(May 9, 2019 at 7:40 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: (May 9, 2019 at 7:06 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: This from the person who threatened to shoot me and then to save face says that I knew I was in no danger.
Good show.
And you've been chewing the carpet ever since. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b55/e2b55393f641b981f35ba4932fc2a006f326124c" alt="Hilarious Hilarious"
It shows that your words are often empty.
And that you are too miserable a human to admit that you shouldn't have said something.
But keep laughing. I am sure you are twisted enough that your BS amuses you.
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: FB bans 'dangerous' individuals
May 9, 2019 at 8:15 pm
(May 9, 2019 at 8:11 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: (May 9, 2019 at 7:40 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: And you've been chewing the carpet ever since. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b55/e2b55393f641b981f35ba4932fc2a006f326124c" alt="Hilarious Hilarious"
It shows that your words are often empty.
And that you are too miserable a human to admit that you shouldn't have said something.
But keep laughing. I am sure you are twisted enough that your BS amuses you.
As long as my posts make you happy. I live for that and that alone.
Posts: 5599
Threads: 37
Joined: July 13, 2015
Reputation:
61
RE: FB bans 'dangerous' individuals
May 9, 2019 at 8:32 pm
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2019 at 9:23 pm by Athene.)
(May 9, 2019 at 6:41 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Ok, so ALL those Radical Republicans who voted, who lobbied, who - quite frankly - used whatever political dirty tricks they could get away with to end chattel slavery in the US were not being virtuous?
Come on.
Boru
The Radical Republicans' heyday was more post-war than anything else. They were equally, if not more concerned with protecting their own business interests and maintaining/seizing political power as they were with anything else.
True enough, they were instrumental in setting Reconstruction policy. However, they got distracted by in-fighting, power-grabs, and fast choo-choo trains, and FAILED miserably. That failure of which subsequently ushered in the glorious horror show we know of as Jim Crow. So.... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I mean, if you want me to say some of them were probably nice guys, I will.
Some of them were probably nice guys.
That doesn't change the fact that the US government has had a direct and deliberate hand in thoroughly fucking over slaves and their descendants for centuries. White supremacy has been a fundamental doctrine of this country for the most of it's existence.
It's true.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: FB bans 'dangerous' individuals
May 9, 2019 at 9:36 pm
(May 9, 2019 at 5:17 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Do we dare mention the race of the slavers?
Sure, but context matters. If you say, "black people should blame black people for slavery," it sounds like all black people should be held responsible for slavery, which is obviously ludicrous. The same goes for blaming all white people. People who keep and sell slaves are the only people to blame.
Sure, weak people who turned a blind eye can shoulder some of that, but they aren't so much at fault as they are complicit.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: FB bans 'dangerous' individuals
May 9, 2019 at 9:40 pm
(May 9, 2019 at 6:16 pm)madog Wrote: Not saying anyone today should be blamed .... However those that want to share in the pride of their past should also be willing to share in the shame ...
Sure. The Confederate flag-toting assholes can definitely take some shame.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: FB bans 'dangerous' individuals
May 9, 2019 at 9:41 pm
(May 9, 2019 at 7:06 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: (May 9, 2019 at 6:10 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: I'm glad you have someone to attack. You desperately need such.
This from the person who threatened to shoot me and then to save face says that I knew I was in no danger.
Good show.
Sorry, what? Someone threatened to shoot you in the face? Legit threatened? Post please?
Posts: 2741
Threads: 2
Joined: May 4, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: FB bans 'dangerous' individuals
May 9, 2019 at 10:18 pm
(May 9, 2019 at 4:25 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (May 9, 2019 at 3:49 pm)CDF47 Wrote: I think Alex Jones is a shill but he shouldn't be censored. Censorship is BS.
He hasn't been censored. He's been removed from Facebook. No one is curtailing his right to speak.
Boru
Censored by Facebook is what I meant.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: FB bans 'dangerous' individuals
May 9, 2019 at 10:24 pm
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2019 at 10:48 pm by Amarok.)
(May 9, 2019 at 10:18 pm)CDF47 Wrote: (May 9, 2019 at 4:25 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: He hasn't been censored. He's been removed from Facebook. No one is curtailing his right to speak.
Boru
Censored by Facebook is what I meant. He hasn't been censored . Nothing about not having a facebook account denies him his freedom of speech .
Quote:Do we dare mention the race of the slavers?
Which ones the ones who bought and moved them across the sea and even if they couldn't by slaves from Africans they would not have been above catching them themselves .
Quote:Sure, but context matters. If you say, "black people should blame black people for slavery," it sounds like all black people should be held responsible for slavery, which is obviously ludicrous. The same goes for blaming all white people. People who keep and sell slaves are the only people to blame.
And the governments that passed laws allowing it and the oppression that followed
Quote:Sure, weak people who turned a blind eye can shoulder some of that, but they aren't so much at fault as they are complicit.
I disagree complicity before moral evil is just as bad
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: FB bans 'dangerous' individuals
May 9, 2019 at 11:23 pm
Technically he was censored by Facebook, but that's okay, because that's not a freedom of speech issue.
Posts: 2741
Threads: 2
Joined: May 4, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: FB bans 'dangerous' individuals
May 10, 2019 at 6:48 am
(May 9, 2019 at 11:23 pm)Shell B Wrote: Technically he was censored by Facebook, but that's okay, because that's not a freedom of speech issue.
Thank you.
|