(May 16, 2019 at 9:45 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(May 16, 2019 at 7:44 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: No, but it certainly suffers from a number of mental issues.

"Thou shalt not kill...except for those bastards over there. And them! Oh, and them over there! Fuck it, I'm killing everyone except that drunk old fart and his family. Incest is awesome!"

It is thou shall not murder. Killing in warfare and in self-defense is permitted in the Scriptures. We will be judged by this.

---

(May 16, 2019 at 7:58 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: The story of Jesus says that he was Jewish.

Had he been Christian he would have been a follower of himself.  Which goes against that whole not following another, as in God the Father.

Jesus came along so there could be a kinder, gentler deity than the OT God.  The God of hellfire, plagues, and worldwide floods wasn't working out as well as planned.

Deciding you have the authority to pick and choose what parts to keep and what parts to ignore are you putting yourself in a god-like position.  

You are an apologetic and not a very good one at that.

The Lord of the OT is the same as the NT. The Lord Jesus had a wrath like when he flipped tables and swung a whip. He also condemed people.

Many would define killing in warfare to be murder, especially if you're the aggressor.

And many people throughout history have murdered in the name of their imaginary friend. A loving deity would stop people killing in its name, especially those belinging to its fan club.

The lord of the OT is a cunt-muffin.

Christians: "Jesus fulfilled all the ancient prophecies!"

Me: "Not according to the Jews, and they're THEIR prophecies."

Christians: *Insert excuses/stretched reasoning here!"

Christians don't have any issues with telling us how jews and judaism get it wrong.  Makes you wonder why nutters like our boy cling to old magic book.

(May 16, 2019 at 10:10 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:

(May 16, 2019 at 9:45 pm)CDF47 Wrote: It is thou shall not murder. Killing in warfare and in self-defense is permitted in the Scriptures. We will be judged by this.

---

The Lord of the OT is the same as the NT. The Lord Jesus had a wrath like when he flipped tables and swung a whip. He also condemed people.

Many would define killing in warfare to be murder, especially if you're the aggressor.

And many people throughout history have murdered in the name of their imaginary friend. A loving deity would stop people killing in its name, especially those belinging to its fan club.

No it's not murder in warfare.

---

(May 17, 2019 at 12:29 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: Christians don't have any issues with telling us how jews and judaism get it wrong.  Makes you wonder why nutters like our boy cling to old magic book.

They didn't recognize their Savior. Most didn't. There are Jewish Christians though.

Today, I'm not in a good mood.... FYI

(May 17, 2019 at 2:59 am)CDF47 Wrote:

(May 16, 2019 at 10:10 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Many would define killing in warfare to be murder, especially if you're the aggressor.

And many people throughout history have murdered in the name of their imaginary friend.  A loving deity would stop people killing in its name, especially those belinging to its fan club.

No it's not murder in warfare.

Religious people are so fucking stupid!!
I mean, how much of a self centered bastard do you have to be to think that a god cares one iota about if a group of humans is at war with another group of humans when it issues a command?????

Put yourself in god's shoes... at least try to imagine... would there be favorites among its entire creation?? Fucking NO!
It's tribalist, backwards and retarded to think there would be.

If the order is not to kill, that applies to all, no fucking exceptions, you fucking idiot! How stupid do you think god is?!
Grow the fuck up and stop being a fucking cunt!

Either you believe that a god exists, or you believe that a super-king exists. Judaism and all the religions that came from it are on the super-king camp and they're all equally stupid.
While I can forgive ignorant ancient people for having this mentality, I am baffled at how much of that stupidity reached the now.

Um, how about that DNA, huh?

I guess at 1300+pages it would be too much of a chore to split this thread into all the various topics covered; like biblical inerrancy, biblical prophecy fulfillment or the lack thereof, and maybe one about DNA.

(May 17, 2019 at 3:23 am)pocaracas Wrote: Today, I'm not in a good mood.... FYI

Have you noticed when you tell someone to calm down you always aggravate the person more?

(May 17, 2019 at 9:29 am)LastPoet Wrote:

(May 17, 2019 at 3:23 am)pocaracas Wrote: Today, I'm not in a good mood.... FYI

Have you noticed when you tell someone to calm down you always aggravate the person more?

I have.
And when you call them stupid, they increase the level of stupidity.
It's like human nature is self-destructive.

(May 16, 2019 at 8:38 am)CDF47 Wrote:

(May 15, 2019 at 10:00 am)Gwaithmir Wrote: It is a problem indeed, because you can't back up a single claim you've made with any evidence. The fact that you choose to believe what has been written in a book of mythology and heroic fiction is laughable. You're squandering your only existence on a pipe dream. You're as ridiculous as those Jehovah's Witnesses who appear at my door twice a year.

Jesus is a historic figure and the Bible is the truth.

Once again, when confronted with the truth, you pull worthless claims out of your ass with absolutely NO evidence to back them up.

That Jesus was an historical figure is highly unlikely, since nothing was written about him until 20-30 years after his alleged crucifixion. Here are all the historians who were contemporaries of Jesus:

Persius 34-62 BCE
Petronius 27-66 BCE
Philo 20-50 BCE
Marcus Clavius Rufus 11-71 BCE
Columella 4-70 BCE
Florius Lucius 5 BCE-55 CE
Geminus 10 BCE-50 CE
Phaedrus 15 BCE-50 CE
Titus Livius 59 BCE-17 CE
Marcus Paterculus 19 BCE-31 CE
Pomponius Mela 15 BCE-45 CE
Valerius Maximus 10BCE-57 CE
Lucius Seneca 4-65 CE
Hero of Alexandria 10-70 CE
Appolonius of Tyrana 15-106 CE
Musonius Rufus 20-101 CE

If Jesus was an historical character of such great importance, why do these historians have nothing to say about him? Why did none of the Biblical writers have nothing to say about him until two or more decades after his alleged crucifixion? Why is there no Roman record of his trial and execution? It's far more likely that the biblical Jesus is a fictional character based upon the lives of several would-be messiahs of that period.

As for your claim that the Bible is true, that claim has been successfully refuted numerous times in this discussion. You are in a state of irrational denial in this regard. Regardless of how many times you lie about the accuracy of the Bible, your lie does not become the truth through endless repetition.

You're not very good at this. Get an education, numb nuts!