(August 21, 2021 at 4:11 pm)Helios Wrote:

Quote:You said it wasn't an advocacy piece, which it was.  So again, why would they use an advocacy title if it wasn't an advocacy article?

Again did you even read it?

Of course I read this advocacy piece.  That's why I posted it. 

But you've reminded me why I have the policy of never linking sources for leftwingers.  They don't really want it., then they throw a fit when you provide it.

Lesson learned.

(August 21, 2021 at 4:11 pm)Mashmont Wrote:

(August 21, 2021 at 3:57 pm)Helios Wrote: Wait you judge an article by its title and not its contents?

You said it wasn't an advocacy piece, which it was.  So again, why would they use an advocacy title if it wasn't an advocacy article?

Or perhaps the authors were just trying to be clever. Whether the article is advocating something depends on the contents of the article, not your guesses about why the authors chose a specific title. And it's still not advocating single motherhood in general.

Quote:Of course I read this advocacy piece.  That's why I posted it. 

But you've reminded me why I have the policy of never linking sources for leftwingers.  They don't really want it., then they throw a fit when you provide it.

Lesson learned.

You clearly didn't, And you reminded me why I should never ask a right-winger for a source because they throw a fit when you question their conclusions about it.

Whatever. You're so full of shit, Mashmont. You don't even get that while many of us here lean left, we're perfectly open to criticism of leftist ideas.

You're just assuming we don't... because you come from a place where it is better to win a dishonest argument than have an honest one.

Why don't you go back there?

(August 21, 2021 at 4:17 pm)Helios Wrote:

Quote:Of course I read this advocacy piece.  That's why I posted it. 

But you've reminded me why I have the policy of never linking sources for leftwingers.  They don't really want it., then they throw a fit when you provide it.

Lesson learned.

You clearly didn't, And you reminded me why I should never ask a right-winger for a source because they throw a fit when you question their conclusions about it.

It's truly laughable you are going through all these gyrations to try to make the claim feminists don't see men as unnecessary in terms of raising children.

Quote:It's truly laughable you are going through all these gyrations to try to make the claim feminists don't see men as unnecessary in terms of raising children.

Because they don't. What's laughable is your assertion they do.

(August 21, 2021 at 4:13 pm)Mashmont Wrote:

(August 21, 2021 at 4:11 pm)Helios Wrote: Again did you even read it?

Of course I read this advocacy piece.  That's why I posted it. 

But you've reminded me why I have the policy of never linking sources for leftwingers.  They don't really want it., then they throw a fit when you provide it.

Lesson learned.

So, you are a conservative Catholic. What do you want to accomplish here?

So far, you are doing an excellent job of making an ass of yourself...if that was your goal, well done.

(August 21, 2021 at 4:23 pm)Helios Wrote:

Quote:It's truly laughable you are going through all these gyrations to try to make the claim feminists don't see men as unnecessary in terms of raising children.

Because they don't. What's laughable is your assertion they do.

lol.  I honestly think I could get you people to take any position if I said the opposite.

(August 21, 2021 at 4:24 pm)Mashmont Wrote:

(August 21, 2021 at 4:23 pm)Helios Wrote: Because they don't. What's laughable is your assertion they do.

lol.  I honestly think I could get you people to take any position if I said the opposite.

"You people". What a pompous ass you are Assmunch.

Quote:lol.  I honestly think I could get you, people, to take any position if I said the opposite.

No