@Huggy Bear

Just to clarify: talking, sentient serpents and donkeys, human-to-salt pillar transformation, a giant boat built by a 300 year old man that carried millions of species across a global flood, human beings created by ribs and dirt, and people coming back to life after a long weekend could all be totally plausible facts of reality, but a person’s brain developing into a gender that doesn’t match their genitalia is where you draw the line?

Sit with that for a minute or two, Hugz.

(October 8, 2021 at 4:49 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote:

(October 8, 2021 at 3:16 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: So post-menopausal women and infertile men aren't really men and women?

If an apple tree no longer produces apples is it still an apple tree? I like how yall like to act dumb and pretend biology doesn't exist. Point me to the peer reviewed article that states there isn't any biological difference between a male and female.

I’m not the one who pegged the definition of men and women to biological processes that, even by your own narrow standards, don’t actually occur in all men or women. That’s the fucking point, dude.

---

(October 8, 2021 at 6:01 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: @Huggy Bear

Just to clarify: talking, sentient serpents and donkeys, human-to-salt pillar transformation, a giant boat built by a 300 year old man that carried millions of species across a global flood, human beings created by ribs and dirt, and people coming back to life after a long weekend could all be totally plausible facts of reality, but a person’s brain developing into a gender that doesn’t match their genitalia is where you draw the line?

Sit with that for a minute or two, Hugz.

And also Eve fucking a snake, don’t forget that. And, no, I’m not even kidding about that. He’s admitted he believes that.

(October 8, 2021 at 10:18 am)Divinity Wrote:

(October 7, 2021 at 9:46 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote: Explain how his murder has anything to do with homophobia if he was a meth dealer and in a sexual relationship with one of his killers?

Oh, look. The dumbest motherfucker on the internet posts here. Why am I not surprised? Another homophobic bigotted piece of trash (I'd call you a maggot, but that's an insult to maggots) who defends the murder of gay people based on lies, lies, and more goddamn lies. The idea that Matthew Shepard was a drug dealer is so stupid, that cops have said if you believe that, you'd "believe anything you read'. And you probably do! That's how goddamn stupid you are. You spreading shit bullshit is disgusting. You're no better than Alex Jones. Of course you probably take that as a compliment. You probably are a Sandy Hook denier too. I really hope you don't have children, because your genes need to get the fuck out of the pool.

---

(October 7, 2021 at 10:58 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Exclude people from being considered people? What is this nonsense? Please quote Dave where he said trans people are not human beings. You're trying to make him out to sound like Hitler or something. You people always do this shit and exaggerate beyond belief.

Dave has nothing against people for being trans. He has a problem with trans authoritarian bullies that bullied his trans friend, who then killed herself by jumping off a building. Bunch of cunts.

I just watched the stand-up special and it was fantastic. One of Dave's best specials. He seems to be conflating gender with sex, so you can call him undereducated on the subject, but he's not being hateful in the least towards transgender and transsexual people. He didn't use the best words necessarily to make his point, but his point was basically that a trans woman can not perfectly transition into a bio woman, and that a neo-vagina is not quite a bio-vagina. If our side doesn't want TERF to be a cool term like you say (I'm certainly not a terf BTW), then our side needs to stop acting like such authoritarian cunts, because that's only going to push people over to the other side, or scare them into pretending that they agree with you for fear of getting in trouble.

The wokeists need to get over themselves. Trans need to learn to laugh at themselves. I'm bisexual, not that there's anything right with that, and a lot of jokes about gays can be pretty funny. Why is Dave obsessed with joking about trans over and over? Why is Louis CK, Bill Burr, etc railing against cancel culture in their acts? Because it's necessary at this point in time for people to take a stand against the BS woke cancel culture, and Dave Chapelle and these other comedians are not speaking up about this to be edgy. That's not it at all. It's because they feel it is absolutely necessary to take a stand at this moment in history, to try to save comedy in general from being cancelled and watered down by the woke mob. I applaud them for doing this.

You're the one who needs to get over yourself. These comedians aren't funny. They're punching down, and spreading hate and prejudice. That's all they're doing, and it's all you're doing. And just because people aren't afraid anymore to stand up to your bullshit, doesn't mean you're being oppressed.

Punching down is one of the funniest forms of comedy. I love seeing comedians punching down. No one is immune from being joked about.

(October 8, 2021 at 5:47 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:

(October 8, 2021 at 4:49 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote: If an apple tree no longer produces apples is it still an apple tree? I like how yall like to act dumb and pretend biology doesn't exist. Point me to the peer reviewed article that states there isn't any biological difference between a male and female.

Would you like the data on the difference between biological sex and gender? I mean, it’s a matter of public record. You can find it easily yourself.

Why, when he can sea-lion it out of someone else? And then he can't move the goal posts on you, either.

(October 8, 2021 at 5:50 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: @Irreligious Atheist

Denying a person’s existence, or treating their identity like an illness is pretty dehumanizing. That’s not obvious?

Denying a person's existence? What the heck? Pretty sure Dave Chappelle did not think his trans friend was a figment of his imagination. Pretty sure he knew she was a human being and not Frankenstein's monster. This is the type of rhetoric that makes a lot of people not take the trans side seriously, sadly.

(October 8, 2021 at 6:26 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(October 8, 2021 at 4:49 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote: If an apple tree no longer produces apples is it still an apple tree? I like how yall like to act dumb and pretend biology doesn't exist. Point me to the peer reviewed article that states there isn't any biological difference between a male and female.

I’m not the one who pegged the definition of men and women to biological processes that, even by your own narrow standards, don’t actually occur in all men or women. That’s the fucking point, dude.

And Huggy running to the dictionary to try and deny Trans people exist 

---

(October 8, 2021 at 6:26 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(October 8, 2021 at 4:49 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote: If an apple tree no longer produces apples is it still an apple tree? I like how yall like to act dumb and pretend biology doesn't exist. Point me to the peer reviewed article that states there isn't any biological difference between a male and female.

I’m not the one who pegged the definition of men and women to biological processes that, even by your own narrow standards, don’t actually occur in all men or women. That’s the fucking point, dude.

---

(October 8, 2021 at 6:01 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: @Huggy Bear

Just to clarify: talking, sentient serpents and donkeys, human-to-salt pillar transformation, a giant boat built by a 300 year old man that carried millions of species across a global flood, human beings created by ribs and dirt, and people coming back to life after a long weekend could all be totally plausible facts of reality, but a person’s brain developing into a gender that doesn’t match their genitalia is where you draw the line?

Sit with that for a minute or two, Hugz.

And also Eve fucking a snake, don’t forget that. And, no, I’m not even kidding about that. He’s admitted he believes that.

Then Huggy responds by using the dictionary definition of the female sex. Completely misses the topic at hand. 

(October 8, 2021 at 6:51 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote:

(October 8, 2021 at 6:26 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: I’m not the one who pegged the definition of men and women to biological processes that, even by your own narrow standards, don’t actually occur in all men or women. That’s the fucking point, dude.

That's a definition. And one that's softer than the one you yourself gave, since they hedge their bets and say "typically," thus acknowledging that there are other attributes.

(October 8, 2021 at 6:26 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(October 8, 2021 at 6:01 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: @Huggy Bear

Just to clarify: talking, sentient serpents and donkeys, human-to-salt pillar transformation, a giant boat built by a 300 year old man that carried millions of species across a global flood, human beings created by ribs and dirt, and people coming back to life after a long weekend could all be totally plausible facts of reality, but a person’s brain developing into a gender that doesn’t match their genitalia is where you draw the line?

Sit with that for a minute or two, Hugz.

And also Eve fucking a snake, don’t forget that. And, no, I’m not even kidding about that. He’s admitted he believes that.

That's literally what the Talmud states happened (which YOU'VE used as a source on multiple occasions), which makes it a JEWISH belief, and not something I just pulled out of nowhere.

(August 28, 2016 at 8:24 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote: From the Yebamoth Tractate: http://www.come-and-hear.com/yebamoth/yebamoth_103.html

Quote:There, one can well see the reason, since he might possibly mention to him the name of his idol; what evil, however, could be involved here? — That of infusing her with sensual lust. For R. Johanan stated: When the serpent copulated with Eve, he infused her with lust. The lust of the Israelites who stood at Mount Sinai, came to an end, the lust of the idolaters who did not stand at Mount Sinai did not come to an end.

(October 8, 2021 at 7:06 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(October 8, 2021 at 6:51 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote:

That's a definition. And one that's softer than the one you yourself gave, since they hedge their bets and say "typically," thus acknowledging that there are other attributes.

It's hilarious he keeps using  sex definitions which isn't even what were talking about

---

Quote:That's literally what the Talmud states happened (which YOU'VE used as a source on multiple occasions), which makes it a JEWISH belief, and not something I just pulled out of nowhere.

He's not saying you made it up moron. It being Jewish mythology doesn't make it any less absurd