Posts: 67668
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
161
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 12, 2021 at 5:15 pm
I was under the impression that the defense had already rested?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 12, 2021 at 5:32 pm
(November 12, 2021 at 5:10 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: (November 12, 2021 at 5:02 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Given that Grossenkreutz’ actions were done to neutralize the threat from an active shooter (given that Rittenhouse had shot several people by that point, this seems like a plausible self-defense claim), never actually fired the gun, and that, unlike Grossenkreutz, Rittenhouse actually killed three people, it makes sense that the law would come down harder on Rittenhouse than Grossenkreutz.
Uh... That is one way of looking at it.
The other is he was pointing a gun at someone defending himself....
Read the article. He said under oath that Rittenhouse did NOT fire until he pointrd his pistol at Rittenhouse
If Grosskruerz had fired first ( they were at point blank range) would HE be up on charges?
There really isn' t an innocent party here.
They ALL fucked up.
And he killed 2. Wounded 1.
No dude. The Rambo baby face twat had no legal right to even possess a firearm and he transported across state lines illegally. Not only that the jackass claimed to be there to protect property and lend medical aid while there. Name me one fucking fireman or EMT that needs an assault riffle to lend aid?
What's next, you go into surgery for a heart bypass and your surgeon is sporting a bazooka? That fucking little snot wanted to play hero, nothing more.
Posts: 12368
Threads: 125
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation:
45
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 12, 2021 at 5:47 pm
(This post was last modified: November 12, 2021 at 5:59 pm by Rev. Rye.)
(November 12, 2021 at 5:10 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: (November 12, 2021 at 5:02 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Given that Grossenkreutz’ actions were done to neutralize the threat from an active shooter (given that Rittenhouse had shot several people by that point, this seems like a plausible self-defense claim), never actually fired the gun, and that, unlike Grossenkreutz, Rittenhouse actually killed three people, it makes sense that the law would come down harder on Rittenhouse than Grossenkreutz.
Uh... That is one way of looking at it.
The other is he was pointing a gun at someone defending himself....
Read the article. He said under oath that Rittenhouse did NOT fire until he pointrd his pistol at Rittenhouse
If Grosskruerz had fired first ( they were at point blank range) would HE be up on charges?
There really isn' t an innocent party here.
They ALL fucked up.
And he killed 2. Wounded 1.
If Grossenkreutz fired first, he’d probably also be up on charges at some point. Thing is, in the real world, he didn’t fire first. He didn’t fire his gun at all. And did Rittenhouse not shoot and kill two people before Grossenkreutz decided to aim at him?
Also, I changed the bit about him killing three people after I looked at the body count. And that was within five minutes of my originally posting. And now that I noticed I reiterated the false claim in the part Biker didn't quote and didn't change it, I have done so while I still can.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png)
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Posts: 28720
Threads: 527
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
89
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 12, 2021 at 6:38 pm
I'm hopping for a hung jury and retrial, with a new judge. This one was a cluster.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 12, 2021 at 6:40 pm
(November 12, 2021 at 5:32 pm)Brian37 Wrote: (November 12, 2021 at 5:10 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: Uh... That is one way of looking at it.
The other is he was pointing a gun at someone defending himself....
Read the article. He said under oath that Rittenhouse did NOT fire until he pointrd his pistol at Rittenhouse
If Grosskruerz had fired first ( they were at point blank range) would HE be up on charges?
There really isn' t an innocent party here.
They ALL fucked up.
And he killed 2. Wounded 1.
No dude. The Rambo baby face twat had no legal right to even possess a firearm and he transported across state lines illegally. Not only that the jackass claimed to be there to protect property and lend medical aid while there. Name me one fucking fireman or EMT that needs an assault riffle to lend aid?
What's next, you go into surgery for a heart bypass and your surgeon is sporting a bazooka? That fucking little snot wanted to play hero, nothing more.
You seem to be forgetting that the third guy he shot was doing the exact same thing - claiming to be medic while packing live iron.....
But.. But....but... THAT'S DIFFERENT!!!!
Posts: 12368
Threads: 125
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation:
45
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 12, 2021 at 6:58 pm
(November 12, 2021 at 6:40 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: (November 12, 2021 at 5:32 pm)Brian37 Wrote: No dude. The Rambo baby face twat had no legal right to even possess a firearm and he transported across state lines illegally. Not only that the jackass claimed to be there to protect property and lend medical aid while there. Name me one fucking fireman or EMT that needs an assault riffle to lend aid?
What's next, you go into surgery for a heart bypass and your surgeon is sporting a bazooka? That fucking little snot wanted to play hero, nothing more.
You seem to be forgetting that the third guy he shot was doing the exact same thing - claiming to be medic while packing live iron.....
But.. But....but... THAT'S DIFFERENT!!!!
You know, except for the fact that one guy shot three people and killed two, and the other guy only drew his gun to neutralise the threat of an active shooter and never even got to fire his gun. Other than that, totally identical.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Posts: 67668
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
161
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 12, 2021 at 7:00 pm
The moral sewer defense. Your honor, how could my client be guilty, everyone is guilty!
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 12, 2021 at 7:08 pm
(November 12, 2021 at 7:00 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: The moral sewer defense. Your honor, how could my client be guilty, everyone is guilty!
Quite the cunt ain'tcha???
Show everyone here - where did I defend this kid?
Answer: I didn't.
......
You want the world to believe your saints are persecuted.
Fuck you....
Your team came looking for trouble.
They found it
...
A teenager handed them their asses....
....
There' s no hero in this story.
Just a bunch of fuckwads all so sure of their purity of motive.
Posts: 863
Threads: 49
Joined: January 2, 2021
Reputation:
11
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 12, 2021 at 7:16 pm
About the judge, I saw it reported on Philip Defranco that this judge has actually been unfair and a hardass in previous cases. Like, he's well-known for this kind of biased handling.
I admit, I haven't been keeping up. I forgot about Rittenhouse.
Do you think the tears were real or fake? Don't lawyers coach their clients before they go on the stand? How many times has he told this story? I don't doubt that it's traumatic to kill someone (2 people) but it feels convenient to produce tears/be unable to speak on the stand.
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 12, 2021 at 7:18 pm
(November 12, 2021 at 6:38 pm)brewer Wrote: I'm hopping for a hung jury and retrial, with a new judge. This one was a cluster. The judge was talking to the jury about lesser charges
...
My guess? He will get less than 10 years... And he killed 2 people...
Ask me - he should get about 20 years total.
And the third guy he shot owns half of his own bullet. He should get 10 years just on illegal carry....
|
