(March 21, 2022 at 9:39 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:

(March 21, 2022 at 2:30 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: I want to know those things too, but you're doing whataboutism here to cover for how you mindlessly bought into conspiracy theories about the Hunter Biden laptop story being Russian disinfo.

It's not whataboutism because these people actually worked for the government and did criminal stuff which they covered up. In other words, these are serious stuff while Hunter Biden is not.

Do you know what whataboutism means? Why did you think it was relevant to bring up the Trump children in the first place? No one was talking about the Trump children. What you did is like me posting about and commenting on a story about a rapist who raped 5 people, and you respond by saying "why are you bringing that up? You're weird for caring about that when there's this rapist over here who's raped 50 people. Why aren't we talking about that instead, and only that?" Like I posted before, we can care about more than one thing. It was super strange for you to bring the Trump children up out of the blue, especially considering that I've not once ever defended the Trump children, so save that talk for the actual Trump supporters please.

Now that that's out of the way, let's look at the story that I posted. This censoring and lying about this story has been a massive scandal, and the censoring of the story at the time right before the election was one of the biggest scandals in the history of twitter. Major story. So are people here acting out right now because I'm focusing on a tiny story and blowing it up? Nope. It's the opposite. There is no story bigger than this right now that is more fitting for a conspiracy thread. This story is a thousand times bigger than any other news posted in this thread, like shit show news about randos claiming they've communicated with aliens or whatever other nonsense. People are just upset because they failed to see the obvious truth that the Hunter story was true and these people fell for a ploy and really don't like that I am now pointing that out. Of course people aren't going to like it when they find out that the reality in their heads was a lie, and that's fine, but hopefully people learn from this and learn to be more skeptical of the establishment.

President Biden is corrupt like any other President and his son has taken money for access to his dad, and his dad took a cut of that money. This isn't the end of the world. All politicians are corrupt and it's whatever and there are many things higher on the list that people should be worried about. I agree. I couldn't care less what happens to Hunter, so quit acting like I'm obsessed with Hunter and think he's Satan incarnate and that I'm obsessed with seeing him go to prison or something. That's not what this is about, so stop painting that false narrative. What I'm doing here is called having integrity and consistency in my beliefs. If it wouldn't be ok for social media, almost all of mainstream media, and intelligence officials to interfere in the election in favour of Donald Trump, then it's not ok to do it for your guy either. Integrity and consistency, like I said. To me, the ends don't justify the means, but if you're ok with election interference because you thought the threat of a second Trump term merited it, just be honest and say that.

(March 22, 2022 at 12:19 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:  Why did you think it was relevant to bring up the Trump children in the first place? 

Yeah, you are so soft for Trump's children.

As someone who looks into people looking into shady dealings they should first reaserch when Chinese government granted a total of 41 trademarks to companies linked to Ivanka Trump after her father became president.

(March 22, 2022 at 12:19 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: President Biden is corrupt like any other President and his son has taken money for access to his dad, and his dad took a cut of that money.

Again, there is no evidence for what you just said, and until there is some evidence you should be concentrated on real criminals.

@IA
Still huffing reich wing farts, I see. How's your twitter clone coming along? Start the good work yet?

@Irreligious Atheist on a scale of 1-10, when the NYP published their story about a Hunter Biden laptop, what was your confidence level that the allegations in the story were likely true?

(March 22, 2022 at 11:07 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: @Irreligious Atheist on a scale of 1-10, when the NYP published their story about a Hunter Biden laptop, what was your confidence level that the allegations in the story were likely true?

(March 22, 2022 at 2:33 am)Fake Messiah Wrote:

(March 22, 2022 at 12:19 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:  Why did you think it was relevant to bring up the Trump children in the first place? 

Yeah, you are so soft for Trump's children.

As someone who looks into people looking into shady dealings they should first reaserch when Chinese government granted a total of 41 trademarks to companies linked to Ivanka Trump after her father became president.

(March 22, 2022 at 12:19 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: President Biden is corrupt like any other President and his son has taken money for access to his dad, and his dad took a cut of that money.

Again, there is no evidence for what you just said, and until there is some evidence you should be concentrated on real criminals.

Why are you going entirely off topic? Again, no one was talking about Ivanka. Your refusal to answer my question says it all. You are completely ok with election interference if it helps your guy, because you have no principles.

What's next? I bring up Cosby, and you tell me to shut up about Cosby because serial killers are worse? All you can do is change the subject, and it's pretty clear why you're doing it.

---

(March 22, 2022 at 11:07 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: @Irreligious Atheist on a scale of 1-10, when the NYP published their story about a Hunter Biden laptop, what was your confidence level that the allegations in the story were likely true?

The Biden campaign didn't even come out and deny that the emails were Hunters when the story broke. It was clear from the start that the emails were completely legitimate.

---

(March 22, 2022 at 8:57 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: @IA
Still huffing reich wing farts, I see.  How's your twitter clone coming along?  Start the good work yet?

Kyle Kulinski is a Democratic Socialist, leaning toward outright socialist. I don't think he's interested in posting his videos to a neo-confederate website, but eh, rant on if you must.

Are you Kyle Kulinski? No...then wtf would it even matter, assuming I couldn't poke a giant neo confederate hole in this to begin with..which, ofc, I could.

Get your shit together. I know that some people are full on kumbaya with time to decide what you beleive..but not me. You're an idiot, a natural racist, and an easy mark for intersectional white supremacy - one giant Tolkein shaped conspiracy theory.

Go make your own intentionally stupid social media, no one is stopping you. If no one wants to listen to you, that's not censorship, it's just you being fucking insufferable.

Social media is not the government. Social media is not the government. Social media is the government.

(March 22, 2022 at 2:56 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Are you Kyle Kulinski?  No...then wtf would it even matter, assuming I couldn't poke a giant neo confederate hole in this to begin with..which, ofc, I could.

Get your shit together.  I know that some people are full on kumbaya with time to decide what you beleive..but not me.  You're an idiot, a natural racist, and an easy mark for intersectional white supremacy - one giant Tolkein shaped conspiracy theory.  

Go make your own intentionally stupid social media, no one is stopping you.  If no one wants to listen to you, that's not censorship, it's just you being fucking insufferable.

Social media is not the government.  Social media is not the government.  Social media is the government.

I'm not Kyle Kulinski, but you telling me to make my own neo-confederate website was directly in response to me posting a video by Kyle Kulinski and complaining about a Kyle Kulinski video being censored. Kyle Kulinski is a Democratic Socialist. Do your research.

The thread is titled 'The Daily Conspiracy' and Chucklefuck thinks you can go off topic.

Dumbass. Proves it with every post.

(March 22, 2022 at 3:34 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:

(March 22, 2022 at 2:56 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Are you Kyle Kulinski?  No...then wtf would it even matter, assuming I couldn't poke a giant neo confederate hole in this to begin with..which, ofc, I could.

Get your shit together.  I know that some people are full on kumbaya with time to decide what you beleive..but not me.  You're an idiot, a natural racist, and an easy mark for intersectional white supremacy - one giant Tolkein shaped conspiracy theory.  

Go make your own intentionally stupid social media, no one is stopping you.  If no one wants to listen to you, that's not censorship, it's just you being fucking insufferable.

Social media is not the government.  Social media is not the government.  Social media is the government.

I'm not Kyle Kulinski, but you telling me to make my own neo-confederate website was directly in response to me posting a video by Kyle Kulinski and complaining about a Kyle Kulinski video being censored. Kyle Kulinski is a Democratic Socialist. Do your research.

Because your inept defense is a direct implication that, somehow..you..a known neo confederate and racist sympathizer, are somehow not what you are because...what, you watch kyle kuzinski on youtube?

Cmon, even you aren't that stupid - and you're a known neo confederate and racist sympathizer.  I'm guessing that the reason you don't make your own neo confederate twitter is that you know better than to sink good money after bad.  You just like to bitch about how not enough people are buying for you to invest.  

Social media is not the government.  Social media is not the government.  Social media is not the government.

Let these threads be fun you useless piece of shit...or is the unauthorized experience of fun also censorship?