(March 23, 2022 at 4:00 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: I'm putting 10$ down that says he's gonna stay silent to wait out the 30 days and then think posting links to racist articles will be allowed (they won't) before getting banned followed by a string of socks.

We are ready!

(March 22, 2022 at 7:46 pm)Angrboda Wrote:

(March 22, 2022 at 7:36 pm)deepend Wrote:   What a load of crap.  Tell it to your cult leader.

That runny brown liquid inside your skull?  I quite agree.  As noted earlier, you show all signs of having shit for brains.  That your only response is an argumentum ad lapidem confirms it.

Quote:Appeal to the stone, also known as argumentum ad lapidem, is a logical fallacy that dismisses an argument as untrue or absurd. The dismissal is made by stating or reiterating that the argument is absurd, without providing further argumentation. This theory is closely tied to proof by assertion due to the lack of evidence behind the statement and its attempt to persuade without providing any evidence.

Appeal to the stone is a logical fallacy. Specifically, it is an informal fallacy, which means that it relies on inductive reasoning in an argument to justify an assertion. Informal fallacies contain erroneous reasoning in content of the argument and not the form or structure of it, as opposed to formal fallacies, which contain erroneous reasoning in argument form.

Wikipedia || Appeal to the stone

  I don't have time to reply to a lengthy cult philosophy.  So do this, if you dare.  Out of all that you said, pick the point that you think is the most important.  Or failing that, pick the point that you are most sure that there is no argument against.  I will reply to it.  And crush it.

(March 23, 2022 at 5:24 pm)deepend Wrote:

(March 22, 2022 at 7:46 pm)Angrboda Wrote: That runny brown liquid inside your skull?  I quite agree.  As noted earlier, you show all signs of having shit for brains.  That your only response is an argumentum ad lapidem confirms it.

  I don't have time to reply to a lengthy cult philosophy.  So do this, if you dare.  Out of all that you said, pick the point that you think is the most important.  Or failing that, pick the point that you are most sure that there is no argument against.  I will reply to it.  And crush it.

You have to make some points before we can pick one. All we’ve see from you thus far is misplaced ego, nonsensical gibberish, and a barely concealed desire to start wearing big-boy pants.

Boru

(March 23, 2022 at 5:24 pm)deepend Wrote:

(March 22, 2022 at 7:46 pm)Angrboda Wrote: That runny brown liquid inside your skull?  I quite agree.  As noted earlier, you show all signs of having shit for brains.  That your only response is an argumentum ad lapidem confirms it.

  I don't have time to reply to a lengthy cult philosophy.  So do this, if you dare.  Out of all that you said, pick the point that you think is the most important.  Or failing that, pick the point that you are most sure that there is no argument against.  I will reply to it.  And crush it.

You view logic as a cult philosophy? That explains a lot about your thought process, lol.

(March 22, 2022 at 7:59 pm)Foxaire Wrote: It is astounding how people still confuse consequence for censorship.

You're free to speak your mind, but wisdom allows for the understanding that consequence isn't disgarded in a civilized society.

  There are some very confused people around here.  But I'm not one of them.  Sure, at one point in referring to freedom of speech I referred to the second amendment.  Somebody corrected me and I knew instantly that they were right.  A little slip up now and then is no big deal.  But as far as consequences and censorship, that doesn't apply to me.  You see, if I am right, there are no consequences.  If I am banned for being right, that is censorship. Now if I expressed an opinion, that might be a different matter.  Let's say that somebody said that the only way for negroes to be useful is if they were turned into toilet paper.  I could see them getting banned for voicing such an opinion.  Though under the principle of freedom of speech, they shouldn't be.  An interesting point though is if I said it, I could prove it far beyond anybody's ability to doubt.  I just wouldn't be given the chance to do so.

Keep telling yourself that 

(March 23, 2022 at 5:24 pm)deepend Wrote:

(March 22, 2022 at 7:46 pm)Angrboda Wrote: That runny brown liquid inside your skull?  I quite agree.  As noted earlier, you show all signs of having shit for brains.  That your only response is an argumentum ad lapidem confirms it.

  I don't have time to reply to a lengthy cult philosophy.  So do this, if you dare.  Out of all that you said, pick the point that you think is the most important.  Or failing that, pick the point that you are most sure that there is no argument against.  I will reply to it.  And crush it.

Yer so tuff.

I am impressed.  Really, I am.  Impressed at the high opinion of yourself though you seem to be a complete nitwit.

(March 22, 2022 at 8:20 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote:

(March 22, 2022 at 7:56 pm)deepend Wrote:   Somebody basically telling me that they are going to ignore from now on by saying buh-bye.  Russia has been worse than America in protecting free expression???  Didn't you mean to suggest that I said that America was worse than Russia in protecting free expression?  What I did say once though is that in limiting freedom of speech, any evil becomes possible.  Being possible, as is the nature of mankind, it has been done.  

  You think being thrown in jail in Russia is as bad as things can get?  Think again.  Maybe if I'm allowed to be around long enough I can post some pictures for you of a few of the tens of thousands of White children who have been brutally murdered by blacks in this country.  I might also be able to effectively go into some of the travsty's of justice that have occurred in this country against Whites.  Maybe the greatest genocide in human history might interest you.  Or how about ritual human sacrifice.  I could also post some videos showing some real racism.  And it isn't Whites committing it.  Etc. etc. etc. etc.  Tell the admins to take the fucking chains off me.  I will show you what an "empty vessel" I am.

You think that "whites" should be taken together as a group and judged accordingly, according to one all-encompassing judgment. Same I suppose for "blacks?" Or gays? Yeah. I disagree with that. Not because of popular opinion. More due to avoidance of stupid ideas.

  Interesting dodge.  I wasn't talking about judging groups.  Though I could.

Frozen peaches for everyone!

Quote: Interesting dodge.  I wasn't talking about judging groups.  Though I could.

To bad it wasn't a dodge you are just to dense to get the answer