(July 19, 2022 at 11:55 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: It's an absolute wonder that all of those faked satellite images just so happen to coincide with the actual state of affairs on the ground to the point that they can be used to direct successful artillery.  As if a map of mordor was a perfect fit for some actual ao.

Who told you that?

I've heard some people, who can actually put lead on a dinner plate at distances exceeding a mile, that they need to factor in the rotation of the Earth, I've also heard that some snipers say it has a negligible effect.

I'm not necessarily claiming that I know anything, but what I do know is that people are quick to defend the sphere which supposedly rotates, but we don't feel it. Even when we fly from the equator to the North Pole (change in speed) while our plane is attached to the outer sphere by the magic of air, which, as far as I know; has never been proven as a great way to attach one physical object to another.

And what about the vaccume of space which we hurle ourselves through at >66,000 MPH? I find that people are far more reluctant to defend the motion of earth than they are it's supposed curve.

What about our newly discovered a-centric model which features a Galaxy that move at about 1/1300th the speed of light? Such that we are now more than 2 light-years away from where we still obeserve constellations which were documented more than 2600 years ago?

Nasa claims that all of our constellations were replaced with new fully identical ones. They also claim that we cannot go back to the moon and that their technology (and telemetry) hase gone backwards. Hopefully we will make it out of low-earth orbit soon.

So, are you on a spinning sphere where up could be down based on relativity? Or are you on a plane, with a functioning gyroscope, where up really is up?

(July 22, 2022 at 3:13 am)h311inac311 Wrote:

(July 19, 2022 at 11:55 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: It's an absolute wonder that all of those faked satellite images just so happen to coincide with the actual state of affairs on the ground to the point that they can be used to direct successful artillery.  As if a map of mordor was a perfect fit for some actual ao.

Who told you that?

I've heard some people, who can actually put lead on a dinner plate at distances exceeding a mile, that they need to factor in the rotation of the Earth, I've also heard that some snipers say it has a negligible effect.

I'm not necessarily claiming that I know anything, but what I do know is that people are quick to defend the sphere which supposedly rotates, but we don't feel it. Even when we fly from the equator to the North Pole (change in speed) while our plane is attached to the outer sphere by the magic of air, which, as far as I know; has never been proven as a great way to attach one physical object to another.

And what about the vaccume of space which we hurle ourselves through at >66,000 MPH? I find that people are far more reluctant to defend the motion of earth than they are it's supposed curve.

What about our newly discovered a-centric model which features a Galaxy that move at about 1/1300th the speed of light? Such that we are now more than 2 light-years away from where we still obeserve constellations which were documented more than 2600 years ago?

Nasa claims that all of our constellations were replaced with new fully identical ones. They also claim that we cannot go back to the moon and that their technology (and telemetry) hase gone backwards. Hopefully we will make it out of low-earth orbit soon.

So, are you on a spinning sphere where up could be down based on relativity? Or are you on a plane, with a functioning gyroscope, where up really is up?

Ok,
the Earth rotates but we don't feel it  Well, it's rotating at a constant speed, so why would we feel it? We can only feel a change in speed
what about the vaccume of space which we hurle ourselves through at >66,000 MPH? What about it?
What about our newly discovered a-centric model which features a Galaxy that move at about 1/1300th the speed of light? Not heard about that, please provide a link
Nasa claims that all of our constellations were replaced with new fully identical ones. Where do they claim this?
They also claim that we cannot go back to the moon and that their technology (and telemetry) hase gone backwards. Hopefully we will make it out of low-earth orbit soon.
We can't go back to the Moon using 1960's technology, but have sent several probes there with modern equipment and have plans to put humans there soon. The long delay from the landings of the 1970's to now is more due to politics than technology. We have also sent many probes out of low Earth orbit (two out of the solar system)
So, are you on a spinning sphere where up could be down based on relativity? Or are you on a plane, with a functioning gyroscope, where up really is up?
Why would up be down due to relativity? You clearly have no idea about what relativity says

(July 22, 2022 at 3:13 am)h311inac311 Wrote:

(July 19, 2022 at 11:55 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: It's an absolute wonder that all of those faked satellite images just so happen to coincide with the actual state of affairs on the ground to the point that they can be used to direct successful artillery.  As if a map of mordor was a perfect fit for some actual ao.

Who told you that?

I've heard some people, who can actually put lead on a dinner plate at distances exceeding a mile, that they need to factor in the rotation of the Earth, I've also heard that some snipers say it has a negligible effect.

I'm not necessarily claiming that I know anything, but what I do know is that people are quick to defend the sphere which supposedly rotates, but we don't feel it. Even when we fly from the equator to the North Pole (change in speed) while our plane is attached to the outer sphere by the magic of air, which, as far as I know; has never been proven as a great way to attach one physical object to another.

And what about the vaccume of space which we hurle ourselves through at >66,000 MPH? I find that people are far more reluctant to defend the motion of earth than they are it's supposed curve.

What about our newly discovered a-centric model which features a Galaxy that move at about 1/1300th the speed of light? Such that we are now more than 2 light-years away from where we still obeserve constellations which were documented more than 2600 years ago?

Nasa claims that all of our constellations were replaced with new fully identical ones. They also claim that we cannot go back to the moon and that their technology (and telemetry) hase gone backwards. Hopefully we will make it out of low-earth orbit soon.

So, are you on a spinning sphere where up could be down based on relativity? Or are you on a plane, with a functioning gyroscope, where up really is up?

Why are you so invested in this bullshit? Is your mind so feeble that you can't spot an obvious lie designed to deprive you of your money?

(July 22, 2022 at 3:13 am)h311inac311 Wrote: Nasa claims that all of our constellations were replaced with new fully identical ones.

Nope

Quote:They also claim that we cannot go back to the moon and that their technology (and telemetry) hase gone backwards. Hopefully we will make it out of low-earth orbit soon.

Ish, and hilarious, right?  

Quote:So, are you on a spinning sphere where up could be down based on relativity? Or are you on a plane, with a functioning gyroscope, where up really is up?

That's not what relativity is, but yeah, I'm on a spinning oblate spheroid crashing through space at enormous speeds.  Pretty wild huh.  Or.... maybe..... this is all gods unimpressive little shoebox diorama, huh?

Hey..... do you know how gyroscopes work? Preservation of angular momentum. Cool little four gyro system used in the shuttles. I'll let you mull that one over.

(July 22, 2022 at 6:40 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote:

(July 22, 2022 at 3:13 am)h311inac311 Wrote: Nasa claims that all of our constellations were replaced with new fully identical ones.

Nope

Quote:They also claim that we cannot go back to the moon and that their technology (and telemetry) hase gone backwards. Hopefully we will make it out of low-earth orbit soon.

Ish, and hilarious, right?  

Quote:So, are you on a spinning sphere where up could be down based on relativity? Or are you on a plane, with a functioning gyroscope, where up really is up?

That's not what relativity is, but yeah, I'm on a spinning oblate spheroid crashing through space at enormous speeds.  Pretty wild huh.  Or.... maybe..... this is all gods unimpressive little shoebox diorama, huh?  

Hey..... do you know how gyroscopes work?  Preservation of angular momentum.  Cool little four gyro system used in the shuttles.  I'll let you mull that one over.

Did you feel any of that spinning, eliptical, motion at all? Or did an oblate wizard tell you what to think and you just gobbled it up wholsale without ever looking through his telescope or zooming in on a single star?

Oblate Wizard could be a good band name. Hard to decide the best genre though. Given any more thought to gyroscopes?

(July 20, 2022 at 11:05 am)Fake Messiah Wrote:

(July 19, 2022 at 11:30 am)h311inac311 Wrote: Okay, so how high does an observer have to travel before they can clearly observe the shape of Earth?

Do you guys have footage?

Also, do you trust the government?

"the government"?
Pretty much every government on Earth considers Earth to be spherical.

So, just out of curiosity, why would the government along with all the governments in the world fake all the footage and lie about Earth being spherical? What's in for them to spread such a "hoax"?

What does the word govern mentality mean?

Why would someone make you believe a massive lie? Well maybe because it makes all of their smaller lies easier to digest. You were fed a narrative that you never validated with your own eyes, ears or experiences and then told that's how science works.

Well here I am, one who knocks on the door and askes for a scientific answer to a scientific truth claim. Have you any evidence or are you just spinning your 3-D simulated globe?

So far I've heard everyone of these arguments before and found plenty of video proof to the contrary circa YouTube 2016.

Is that what you're doing? Knocking on doors, opening up eyes? Sounds like alot of responsibility. So...gyroscopes?

(July 22, 2022 at 3:13 am)h311inac311 Wrote: I'm not necessarily claiming that I know anything...

That's probably for the best.

We had someone here who said they were the one who knocks...hmmm. Interesting.