To make it clear. I am not opposed to homosexuals for morale reason (Atleast not in a hyperfocused sense of the boomer Christian culture war). And i think the Christian culture war around it, was just baiting us into this. And was only making Christians fall for commie propaganda. Since in Galatians 5:13-26. The whole point is to deny yourself inorder to serve others. So its not about gay or straight. Its just about loving God and others.

HOWEVER! Within a Communist propaganda framework. They would use Homosexuals, inorder to weaken strong societies. Thats why President Nixon hated that one Episode of "All in the Family". Of this character, Archie Bunker, thinking a effeminate guy = gay, vs strong masculine guy = straight. Nixon felt it was a insult, and was a way to propagandize a anti Western and a anti strong society sentiment. And that it messes up kids view on that.

Either case. If Nixon was in charge, then i dont think anti Christian sentiment, or Commies would have gotten their way. I guess Watergate eventually did do that guy in. But he was INSANELY based on the issue of this!


I guess if i were to use a visual example.

In (Face/Off 1997) movie. Sean Archer is closer to a Christian lifestyle. Than lets say what Castor Troy is.

(August 23, 2026 at 3:58 am)PepsiMAX Wrote: To make it clear. I am not opposed to homosexuals for morale reason (Atleast not in a hyperfocused sense of the boomer Christian culture war). And i think the Christian culture war around it, was just baiting us into this. And was only making Christians fall for commie propaganda. Since in Galatians 5:13-26. The whole point is to deny yourself inorder to serve others. So its not about gay or straight. Its just about loving God and others.

HOWEVER! Within a Communist propaganda framework. They would use Homosexuals, inorder to weaken strong societies. Thats why President Nixon hated that one Episode of "All in the Family". Of this character, Archie Bunker, thinking a effeminate guy = gay, vs strong masculine guy = straight. Nixon felt it was a insult, and was a way to propagandize a anti Western and a anti strong society sentiment. And that it messes up kids view on that.

Either case. If Nixon was in charge, then i dont think anti Christian sentiment, or Commies would have gotten their way. I guess Watergate eventually did do that guy in. But he was INSANELY based on the issue of this!


I guess if i were to use a visual example.

In (Face/Off 1997) movie. Sean Archer is closer to a Christian lifestyle. Than lets say what Castor Troy is.

Kind of ironic that a raging homophobe like Nixon earned himself the name 'Tricky Dick'. I also suspect that Paul, author of Galatians, was the first incel of note.

Boru

(August 23, 2026 at 5:13 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(August 23, 2026 at 3:58 am)PepsiMAX Wrote: To make it clear. I am not opposed to homosexuals for morale reason (Atleast not in a hyperfocused sense of the boomer Christian culture war). And i think the Christian culture war around it, was just baiting us into this. And was only making Christians fall for commie propaganda. Since in Galatians 5:13-26. The whole point is to deny yourself inorder to serve others. So its not about gay or straight. Its just about loving God and others.

HOWEVER! Within a Communist propaganda framework. They would use Homosexuals, inorder to weaken strong societies. Thats why President Nixon hated that one Episode of "All in the Family". Of this character, Archie Bunker, thinking a effeminate guy = gay, vs strong masculine guy = straight. Nixon felt it was a insult, and was a way to propagandize a anti Western and a anti strong society sentiment. And that it messes up kids view on that.

Either case. If Nixon was in charge, then i dont think anti Christian sentiment, or Commies would have gotten their way. I guess Watergate eventually did do that guy in. But he was INSANELY based on the issue of this!


I guess if i were to use a visual example.

In (Face/Off 1997) movie. Sean Archer is closer to a Christian lifestyle. Than lets say what Castor Troy is.

Kind of ironic that a raging homophobe like Nixon earned himself the name 'Tricky Dick'. I also suspect that Paul, author of Galatians, was the first incel of note.

Boru

Nothing beats the love of Mammon like hate.

(August 23, 2026 at 6:11 am)PepsiMAX Wrote:

(August 23, 2026 at 5:13 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Kind of ironic that a raging homophobe like Nixon earned himself the name 'Tricky Dick'. I also suspect that Paul, author of Galatians, was the first incel of note.

Boru

Nothing beats the love of Mammon like hate.

Get 'em in while you can, kiddo. Your clock is running.

Boru

He will be missed as much as genital warts.

(August 23, 2026 at 11:19 am)AFTT47 Wrote: He will be missed as much as genital warts.

‘I greeted his demise with the same sense of loss I feel at the sudden death of a mad dog.’ -  Mark Twain

Boru

Acccording to De mortuis nihil nisi bene i have to say this about his premature demise:

Jesus fucking christ....what a tool?

I couldn’t read the phrase “homosexual communists” without remembering Straight Jacket, a bizarre (and honestly a bit crap) movie spoofing Rock Hudson’s lavender marriage and also HUAC for some reason, which culminates in this court hearing about “homosexual communists.”

Unfortunately, it looks like I and Matt Baume are the only people who’ve seen it, and somehow the only way I can show us is because somebody uploaded the entire film, and the relevant scene starts about 83 minutes in.





Also, the OP was even more baffling than usual. I know that exact episode of All in the Family that he's talking about.





Maybe I was just a child genius, but the apparent belief that gay men could be strong would undermine Western society would be more confusing to me than the idea that “some gay people can be masculine.”

(August 23, 2026 at 11:23 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: I couldn’t read the phrase “homosexual communists” without remembering Straight Jacket, a bizarre (and honestly a bit crap) movie spoofing Rock Hudson’s lavender marriage and also HUAC for some reason, which culminates in this court hearing about “homosexual communists.”

Unfortunately, it looks like I and Matt Baume are the only people who’ve seen it, and somehow the only way I can show us is because somebody uploaded the entire film, and the relevant scene starts about 83 minutes in.





Also, the OP was even more baffling than usual. I know that exact episode of All in the Family that he's talking about.





Maybe I was just a child genius, but the apparent belief that gay men could be strong would undermine Western society would be more confusing to me than the idea that “some gay people can be masculine.”

Pretty off topic, but here's the absolute best scene from that entire show:





Boru