Your insults don't mean anything ace. I'm not insulting you, I'm telling you what errors you are making. Calling me a fool doesn't mean anything beyond your own hate.

(January 9, 2012 at 11:32 am)amkerman Wrote: Your insults don't mean anything ace. I'm not insulting you, I'm telling you what errors you are making. Calling me a fool doesn't mean anything beyond your own hate.

Yeah, some how I'm ignorant because I don't use your definitions. I'm telling you that you don't get to redefine words. You just can't accept that.

Chuck, you don't need to recognize "my farts as rosy sweetness". You just need to recognize it and understand it. However you understand it is fine. It's like you see me "fart" and you "lack belief" that I farted. Typical of many here.

---

I have repeatedly stated you don't need to use the words ace... Just use the definitions. If you just look at the definitions I use, you will know what I am talking about.

If I define God as "reality" anytime you see "God" you can just use "reality" in it's place an no meaning will have been lost. You are now saying that you refuse to accept the word I use "God" and how I define it, "reality". It is willful ignorance. You will never be able to understand me because you refuse to. It is invincible because you have incontrovertible evidence as to what I mean, the definition, yet you refuse to understand.

(January 9, 2012 at 11:37 am)amkerman Wrote: I have repeatedly stated you don't need to use the words ace... Just use the definitions. If you just look at the definitions I use, you will know what I am talking about.

If I define God as "reality" anytime you see "God" you can just use "reality" in it's place an no meaning will have been lost. You are now saying that you refuse to accept the word I use "God" and how I define it, "reality". It is willful ignorance. You will never be able to understand me because you refuse to. It is invincible because you have incontrovertible evidence as to what I mean, the definition, yet you refuse to understand.

Like I said, I will not use your definitions. The word 'reality' has already been defined.
God is not reality, nothing suggests that god is at all part of reality. It is fantasy as far as I'm aware.

You're right, I don't understand you. You're mentally ill. You need professional help.

God IS reality, not part of it.

(January 9, 2012 at 11:37 am)amkerman Wrote: If I define God as "reality" anytime you see "God" you can just use "reality" in it's place an no meaning will have been lost. You are now saying that you refuse to accept the word I use "God" and how I define it, "reality". It is willful ignorance. You will never be able to understand me because you refuse to. It is invincible because you have incontrovertible evidence as to what I mean, the definition, yet you refuse to understand.

What the hell does this mean? How does the word "god" mean the same as "reality?"

(January 9, 2012 at 12:09 pm)amkerman Wrote: God IS reality, not part of it.

No he isn't. Reality is factual/real. God has not be demonstrated to exist, god is not factual. The claim lacks evidence.

It's the end of the line amkerman, you have no argument.

You must only be able to understand your beliefs then. Anything that you don't believe you can't possibly begin to understand. You said it yourself, "anything beyond your perception is unknown."

(January 9, 2012 at 12:09 pm)amkerman Wrote: God IS reality, not part of it.

God is NOT reality, and not part of it.

The logical fallacies of argument by assertion and definition have become tired of your squatting in their domain and making them laughing stocks of the logical fallacy community. It's time to move on and find some other forms of logical fallacies whose domain you can squat in.

(January 9, 2012 at 12:10 pm)Heather Wrote: What the hell does this mean? How does the word "god" mean the same as "reality?"

It doesn't, Heather. My only explanation is that god is his reality and he is having a hard time accepting that other people do not adhere to his views. It is not his view that is wrong, as his reality is his to decide. It is his projection of his view that is faulty. Furthermore, the steps that he takes to get from "believing" in reality to god are nonexistent. He just goes "reality" *leap* "god."