(February 11, 2012 at 6:19 pm)RW_9 Wrote: It is amusing to watch you carefully try to explain this while trying to not say that your information is nonsense and most likely not supported by any reliable source.

Yeah, that's one way of looking at it.
A.k.a. ad hominem.

Nothing's changed since the battle of Thermopilae.

(February 11, 2012 at 6:23 pm)Rokcet Scientist Wrote: Yeah, that's one way of looking at it.
A.k.a. ad hominem.

Nothing's changed since the battle of Thermopilae.

Actually, that wasn't ad hominem. If I called you a stupid fucking piece of shitcunt, that would be ad hominem.

Well, I have no idea what does or doesn't get buried where you are, but it was pretty easy to find the numbers here, and 8% isn't exactly a flattering number. I've been able to find some statistics from the Netherlands on my own, but I'm missing the total number of rapes reported in 2002 (chosen as a focus since there were alot of independent studies that year) What I'm looking for now is a source that states a bare minimum of 300,000 reports of rape in 2002 (based on the number of convictions that year being around 30% of the total reports as per your claim to 60% or so being false reports..leaving 10% unnaccounted for...statistical error and all of that..lol) to begin approaching the minimum number of reported rapes for your statistics to be accurate with regards to that year. I'll just keep doing this for more and more years if I can find reliable data. The minimum doesn't take into account any reason other than false allegations as a cause for a report that doesn't end in conviction. I'll handle that if and only if the bare minimum numbers can even be met.

(saves me effort if they do turn out to be unfounded, no offense)

(February 11, 2012 at 6:07 pm)Rokcet Scientist Wrote: Well you gotta agree those figures are pretty sensational. And they go against the mainstream. Look how emotionally SG and Hitchslap reacted. As if stung by a bee. Who needs trouble like that. Reason enough to bury it. Let's not rock the boat. Maintain the status quo. Just like everywhere else.

Still strutting around like you have the high ground with no proof. Stop being a stupid cunt and link your bullshit so we can dissect it.

With that tone? No thanks. I'm done. Enjoy jerking off.

Quote:Thermopilae

*sharp intake of breath* That pained me.

Without reading too much of this, I am going to interject something here. Saying that a lot of people lie about rape or even that some people lie about rape is not necessarily something to get in a tizzy about. Firstly, no one is accusing a specific person of lying, so there is no personal offense. Secondly, he's at least partly correct.

On the other hand, I find the numbers here seem greatly exaggerated. A lot of women really are raped. A lot of children are too and even some men. Rape is not rare, so it is silly to act like it is all one big farce. It isn't.

Now act like big kids and cite sources.

UNICRI (United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute). 2002. Correspondence on data on crime victims. March. Turin.

How realistic would you say that explanation is?

(February 11, 2012 at 10:59 pm)Rokcet Scientist Wrote: With that tone? No thanks. I'm done. Enjoy jerking off.

Spoiler Alert: Pretenious mental midget runs around insisting upon himself with no evidence to back up his arguments. Enjoy your 66% of women you rape.

That really is a stupid example. She didn't even say she was raped.