(June 8, 2012 at 8:02 am)Tobie Wrote: In the passage Welsh Cake pulled up, it quite clearly says "destroy both body and soul". If you have a biblical passage saying that destroy means ruin in this case, or that something that can be destroyed is still eternal, then please, share it.

It would be nice if the Scriptures had a glossary, but it doesn’t. For this reason we approach references to destruction the same way we approach references to death. For example:
…but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die. -Genesis 2:17
Adam and Eve do not die within the next 24 hours. Most take this to involve a inner spiritual death, seperation from our Lord’s presence. Exegesis is a skill built up over time; it’s an art not a science. WC is just doodling on the bathroom walls. We are oil painting, although Godschild and Drich tend towards realism and I have a more abstract style.

(June 6, 2012 at 5:59 pm)Godchild Wrote: You know I did not mean one soul, if you did well.... what can I say.
Those who accept Christ as their savior are going to be in heaven, those who do not will be in hell, this is as simple as I can make it.

I love how xtards issue their pussified and superstitious sad attempts at threats, with no clue how stupid they look, referring to what everyone else knows is a bunch of superstitious bullshit fairytales.


YOU ARE ALL GOING TO SUFFER IN THE LAND OF THE ICE GIANTS FOR YOUR DISBELIEF!! MARK MY WORDS, INFIDELS!!!


...ridiculous fucking superstitious pussies...

(June 8, 2012 at 9:17 am)Epimethean Wrote: Well, if we use the Distributive Property of Scriptural Interpretation (DPSI), the bible seems to allow that ruination of body and soul to mean becoming a fat, chain-smoking, Steel Reserve guzzling denizen of Walmart, therefore god exists.

Actually, you are correct. Our sinful natures lead us to defile the Temple of the Body. Dual meanings are also allowed, because the Word operates and many levels. It both guides us in our daily decisions and aids us in our spiritual development.

(June 8, 2012 at 9:52 am)ChadWooters Wrote:

(June 8, 2012 at 8:02 am)Tobie Wrote: In the passage Welsh Cake pulled up, it quite clearly says "destroy both body and soul". If you have a biblical passage saying that destroy means ruin in this case, or that something that can be destroyed is still eternal, then please, share it.

It would be nice if the Scriptures had a glossary, but it doesn’t. For this reason we approach references to destruction the same way we approach references to death. For example:
…but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die. -Genesis 2:17
Adam and Eve do not die within the next 24 hours. Most take this to involve a inner spiritual death, seperation from our Lord’s presence. Exegesis is a skill built up over time; it’s an art not a science. WC is just doodling on the bathroom walls. We are oil painting, although Godschild and Drich tend towards realism and I have a more abstract style.

It is amusing how you idiots take fairy tales to be real. The inability to differentiate between fantasy and reality is a clear marker of insanity. Just sayin'...

(June 8, 2012 at 9:59 am)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: It is amusing how you idiots take fairy tales to be real.

It's sad how different points of view turn some people into vicious and unpleasant asses.

(June 8, 2012 at 9:57 am)ChadWooters Wrote:

(June 8, 2012 at 9:17 am)Epimethean Wrote: Well, if we use the Distributive Property of Scriptural Interpretation (DPSI), the bible seems to allow that ruination of body and soul to mean becoming a fat, chain-smoking, Steel Reserve guzzling denizen of Walmart, therefore god exists.

Actually, you are correct. Our sinful natures lead us to defile the Temple of the Body. Dual meanings are also allowed, because the Word operates and many levels. It both guides us in our daily decisions and aids us in our spiritual development.

But of course, Brother Chad. Hey, those initials might have a punny relevance here.

(June 8, 2012 at 10:04 am)ChadWooters Wrote:

(June 8, 2012 at 9:59 am)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: It is amusing how you idiots take fairy tales to be real.

It's sad how different points of view turn some people into vicious and unpleasant asses.

This isn't about different pounts of view. This is about your inability to discern between reality and fiction, and your sad need to attempt to infect the enlightened with your disease of delusion.

It's sad how delusion can turn some people --meaning YOU -- into arrogant and pretentious assholes. You think your silly Ad Baculum claims that our disbelief in your fairy tales is going to send us to your mythical hell are pleasant and cordial? Go fuck yourself.

(June 6, 2012 at 5:59 pm)Godschild Wrote: All unbelievers are trying to usurp God, this is one of the most obvious things in all history.

I pray to Richard Dawkins (the Antichrist) every night wishing Him luck for day He confronts God to overthrow all that is Good, Right, Just and Awesome and cast the world into an abyss of apathy, depravity, tooth decay, and gay pride parades. Let us hope He can fulfil the ancient atheist prophecy as revealed by Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler (they secretly started WWII to spread atheism). Heil Dawkins, comrade!

(June 8, 2012 at 11:38 am)Tempus Wrote:

(June 6, 2012 at 5:59 pm)Godschild Wrote: All unbelievers are trying to usurp God, this is one of the most obvious things in all history.

I pray to Richard Dawkins (the Antichrist) every night wishing Him luck for day He confronts God to overthrow all that is Good, Right, Just and Awesome and cast the world into an abyss of apathy, depravity, tooth decay, and gay pride parades. Let us hope He can fulfil the ancient atheist prophecy as revealed by Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler (they secretly started WWII to spread atheism). Heil Dawkins, comrade!

I love when theotards pander the most absurd lies and claim that they are "obvious".


We would have to believe in their sky fairy to want to usurp it.

Kinda stupid.

(June 8, 2012 at 2:04 am)Godschild Wrote: You never refuted my statement , the only thing you refuted was your intelligence. Be disappointed in yourself not me, you're the one who doesn't understand the scripture you posted.

Do politely fuck off GC. If you can understand "fuck off" without cherry-picking it that is.

I've humoured you thus far, but you keep pushing your condescending luck with me time and again.

You and Chad don't seem to give a flying shit about your own stupid holy book or the scriptures so why should I?

I can't believe I'm posting a link to bibletools.org but that's what you've driven me to. Kindly take up your silly quarrel and objections to this article from now on please:

http://www.bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuse...w-1028.htm