Well you at least want to take the girl out for a drink so I'd say 21. My brother will be 60 next month and his wife is 45. They've been married for about 23 years I think. It seems socially acceptable to me

(September 10, 2009 at 1:27 pm)binny Wrote: Well you at least want to take the girl out for a drink so I'd say 21. My brother will be 60 next month and his wife is 45. They've been married for about 23 years I think. It seems socially acceptable to me

Darwinian lives in the UK, a place where that magical substance known as "alcohol" is available to people over 18...and anyone younger if you are at home / in a pub garden apparently.

Oh....well....18 then

(September 10, 2009 at 12:11 pm)Eilonnwy Wrote: Which, apparently, in the abomination known as Twilight, werewolves imprint on their soul mate when they meet. So if their soul mate is 2...they imprint.

Fucked up books.

Maybe but I liked the film!

(September 10, 2009 at 12:45 pm)Saerules Wrote: They did a horrible job on the last 3 Harry Potter movies... The first three were actually alright, but the last three have just gotten more and more fail. I think perhaps the actors were better as children?

Again I disagree .... I really loved the last one and have really enjoyed most of them (loved the books, though the last one was a bit depressing until the end, and am seriously looking forward to the last two movies)!

Kyu

You enjoyed 5...? O.o

1 was good (but then it was the first). 2 was shite. 3 was brilliant. 4 was awful (wtf happened to the Quidditch World Cup?). 5 was equally bad. 6 was brilliant.

As for the books, they are all pretty much awful in my opinion, with the notable exceptions of 3 and 7. They got me into the fantasy genre, but there are so many better writers out there, from Philip Pullman to Paul Stewart to Terry Pratchett. I think PoA was great because it drifted substantially from the "Harry goes to Hogwarts, gets into trouble, saves the day" to "Harry goes to Hogwarts, finds out more about his past, meets his godfather, oh no everything has gone wrong at the very end". Same with the last book; everything turns out alright, but the entire plot is different from any of the other books (to be honest, I was getting tired of Hogwarts).

Haven't watched six... I'm told by my sources that they APARRATED out of HOGWARTS, that the burrow was destroyed, and that it completely ignored the story in several other aspects. I can't live with lore destroying esp. when it doesn't make the movie any better

Hard to give a figure. Depends on both parties maturity, which skews it royally. Socially it's as superficial as looks, but who the hell cares. No one really knows but you (your friend ).

Darwinian : 16 is legal, so if you wanna pound a 16 year old go for it.

---

(September 10, 2009 at 1:56 pm)Tiberius Wrote: 1 was good (but then it was the first). 2 was shite. 3 was brilliant. 4 was awful (wtf happened to the Quidditch World Cup?). 5 was equally bad. 6 was brilliant.

As for the books, they are all pretty much awful in my opinion, with the notable exceptions of 3 and 7. They got me into the fantasy genre, but there are so many better writers out there, from Philip Pullman to Paul Stewart to Terry Pratchett. I think PoA was great because it drifted substantially from the "Harry goes to Hogwarts, gets into trouble, saves the day" to "Harry goes to Hogwarts, finds out more about his past, meets his godfather, oh no everything has gone wrong at the very end". Same with the last book; everything turns out alright, but the entire plot is different from any of the other books (to be honest, I was getting tired of Hogwarts).

Phillip Pullman is awesome, His dark materials is a wicked series.

I don't know what the rules were, I'd have to ask.