(November 30, 2012 at 8:00 pm)The truth Wrote: This isn't hard to answer lol. I believe because Christianity is true. History has verified it over and over again. Chrisitanity on planet earth has been the theme of religion for the last 2,000 years. When did I start believing? When I studied the facts and learned for my self.

You are wrong.

History is your worst enemy.

(November 30, 2012 at 9:27 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Archeologists have found many empty tombs in the valley of the kings in Egypt... Did all the mummies rise up, then? Oh my....

Lol that's a funny post. But find me one of those mummy's who said weeks before they died they would rise in three
days, and when they died and placed in a tomb three days later there tombs were empty? Where are thee kings of Egypt?!! notice what you said..... "Archeologists." these Egyptian tombs were here for thousands of years before they Archeologists found them. There is no historical data claiming resurrection. And if it is prove it. The mummies of the past is an entirely different conversation. again that was a funny post lol

---

(November 30, 2012 at 10:50 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

(November 30, 2012 at 8:00 pm)The truth Wrote: This isn't hard to answer lol. I believe because Christianity is true. History has verified it over and over again. Chrisitanity on planet earth has been the theme of religion for the last 2,000 years. When did I start believing? When I studied the facts and learned for my self.

You are wrong.


History is your worst enemy.

I object!

(November 30, 2012 at 10:52 pm)The truth Wrote: Lol that's a funny post. But find me one of those mummy's who said weeks before they died they would rise in three days, and when they died and placed in a tomb three days later there tombs were empty? Where are thee kings of Egypt?!! notice what you said..... "Archeologists." these Egyptian tombs were here for thousands of years before they Archeologists found them. There is no historical data claiming resurrection. And if it is prove it. The mummies of the past is an entirely different conversation. again that was a funny post lol

Claims of ressurection mean nothing in abscence of proof. You ask him to prove pharaohs were ressurected when you say:

The truth Wrote:If we find the tomb, and it's empty this claim would be supported on a high level (which already is) It won't prove it it just will support the claims of the first century Christians.

We? As in modern archeologists?

How do I respond to that? Oh, I know!

The truth Wrote:Lol that's a funny post.

---

(November 30, 2012 at 10:52 pm)The truth Wrote:

(November 30, 2012 at 10:50 pm)Minimalist Wrote: You are wrong.


History is your worst enemy.

I object!

Overruled.

Quote:I object!

Feel free to present all the contemporary evidence for your boy.

If my grams told me a few days before her demise that she was going to rise from the dead...and later her remains came up a miss....I'd organize a posse to hunt down down the bastards that stole them.

(November 30, 2012 at 10:47 pm)Faith No More Wrote:

(November 30, 2012 at 10:33 pm)The truth Wrote: An empty tomb does not support resurrection myths. It just proves that remains are no longer there.

Oh, but it does support the facts. First century Christians claimed that Christ was alive after his burial and that the tomb was empty. If we find the tomb, and it's empty this claim would be supported on a high level (which already is) It won't prove it it just will support the claims of the first century Christians. That's hard to refute.

If I claimed that an alien was standing next to me but then left for his home planet, would you find the fact that he was not there to support my claims?

This is washed water!Lol But what if almost a thousand people was with you, saw the alien, and hurd him speak word for word. What if they could show you how he looked without any contridicions of the other witneses? What if they all saw him, and there description of the alien agrees with one another in every detail?On those bases yes I would consider it fact.

---

"Claims of ressurection mean nothing in abscence of proof. You ask him to prove pharaohs were ressurected when you say:"
Darkstar do you really need abscene proof or just hard facts to support history? Your statement is not true. Obviously there is no way to proove the ressurection of Christ. But there are many facts that support it. Notice I said historical facts. Can you prove Darwin didn't think about accepting Christ on his death bed? No. But we can search the facts and go from there. Can you prove what caused the big bang? No. No. No. Know that's funny.

---

(November 30, 2012 at 10:27 pm)Faith No More Wrote: I do not think you know what "proven" means.

I don't think you know what facts mean lol

---

(November 30, 2012 at 10:56 pm)Darkstar Wrote:

(November 30, 2012 at 10:52 pm)The truth Wrote: Lol that's a funny post. But find me one of those mummy's who said weeks before they died they would rise in three days, and when they died and placed in a tomb three days later there tombs were empty? Where are thee kings of Egypt?!! notice what you said..... "Archeologists." these Egyptian tombs were here for thousands of years before they Archeologists found them. There is no historical data claiming resurrection. And if it is prove it. The mummies of the past is an entirely different conversation. again that was a funny post lol

Claims of ressurection mean nothing in abscence of proof. You ask him to prove pharaohs were ressurected when you say:

The truth Wrote:If we find the tomb, and it's empty this claim would be supported on a high level (which already is) It won't prove it it just will support the claims of the first century Christians.

We? As in modern archeologists?

How do I respond to that? Oh, I know!

The truth Wrote:Lol that's a funny post.

---

(November 30, 2012 at 10:52 pm)The truth Wrote: I object!

Overruled.

Darkstar "Claims of ressurection mean nothing in abscence of proof. You ask him to prove pharaohs were ressurected when you say:"
Darkstar do you really need abscene proof or just hard facts to support history? Your statement is not true. Obviously there is no way to proove the ressurection of Christ. But there are many facts that support it. Notice I said historical facts. Can you prove Darwin didn't think about accepting Christ on his death bed? No. But we can search the facts and go from there. Can you prove what caused the big bang? No. No. No. Know that's funny.

Quote:But what if almost a thousand people was with you and seen the alien and Hurd him peak word for word,

Admit it...English is not your first language....or, you are from fucking Mississippi.

(November 30, 2012 at 11:48 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

Quote:But what if almost a thousand people was with you and seen the alien and Hurd him peak word for word,

Admit it...English is not your first language....or, you are from fucking Mississippi.

I see someone is frustrated lol And besides you wrote"( Feel free to present all the contemporary evidence for your Boy.)"That's better grammar? Stop the frustration please! Lol

---

(November 30, 2012 at 10:50 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

(November 30, 2012 at 8:00 pm)The truth Wrote: This isn't hard to answer lol. I believe because Christianity is true. History has verified it over and over again. Chrisitanity on planet earth has been the theme of religion for the last 2,000 years. When did I start believing? When I studied the facts and learned for my self.

You are wrong.

History is your worst enemy.

Show your evidence.

(December 1, 2012 at 12:10 am)The truth Wrote:

(November 30, 2012 at 11:48 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Admit it...English is not your first language....or, you are from fucking Mississippi.

I see someone is frustrated lol And besides you wrote"( Feel free to present all the contemporary evidence for your Boy.)"That's better grammar? Stop the frustration please! Lol

I was able to understand his post the first time I read it. Your post on the other hand was a fucking mess.