(June 2, 2013 at 1:54 pm)ideologue08 Wrote:

(June 2, 2013 at 1:49 pm)Insanity x Wrote: Its more that he been posting this as a series rather than just posting it all together.

If he posted it all together in one thread, that would be constituting spam, someone actually got banned for that. So either way Muslim Scholar loses.

The Forum mourns the loss of such an intellectual heavyweight.

(June 2, 2013 at 1:58 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: The Forum doesn't mourn the loss of a theist.

Fixed.

She used that as a verb, "to spam".

(June 2, 2013 at 1:54 pm)ideologue08 Wrote: If he posted it all together in one thread, that would be constituting spam, someone actually got banned for that. So either way Muslim Scholar loses.

Well, when someone copy-paste from other websites without mentioning the source, across several threads without discussing the points made, like happened before, then ultimately that person will be banned. But even those are analised case by case.

You have a poor definition of spam and you don't belong to the staff, so please stop saying how will we act.

(June 2, 2013 at 1:54 pm)ideologue08 Wrote:

(June 2, 2013 at 1:49 pm)Insanity x Wrote: Its more that he been posting this as a series rather than just posting it all together.

If he posted it all together in one thread, that would be constituting spam, someone actually got banned for that. So either way Muslim Scholar loses.

If you're thinking of who I think you're thinking of, it's not comparable.

I believe Kay was simply expressing her personal opinion, not stating any official position. I personally have no issue with how MS has chosen to organize and present his ideas.

(June 2, 2013 at 2:00 pm)LastPoet Wrote: You have a poor definition of spam

You're right, I probably do have a poor definition... but she also threatened to "move the whole shebang to the humor forum", so you gotta cut me some slack here

Meh, its some sort of pehemptive persecution complex. The staff hasn't done anything and he is already crying that muslims are being persecuted. They do have alot in common with christians.

(June 2, 2013 at 2:08 pm)ideologue08 Wrote: You're right, I probably do have a poor definition... but she also threatened to "move the whole shebang to the humor forum", so you gotta cut me some slack here

It is where it belongs, given the ridiculous claims they contain

But what are you now? MS's lawyer?

(June 2, 2013 at 2:08 pm)LastPoet Wrote: The staff hasn't done anything and he is already crying that muslims are being persecuted. They do have alot in common with christians

No, but she has clearly threatened to do something It's not really about persecution of muslims I'm worried about lol it's more about having to toe the line, you know, suppressing opinions. I'm not crying about it, you have every right to run the forums as you see fit, I'm just pointing it out that's all It's the libertarian in me coming out. I agree with Cthulhu Dreaming. After looking at it again, I think she was just expressing her own opinions.

---

(June 2, 2013 at 2:08 pm)LastPoet Wrote: It is where it belongs, given the ridiculous claims they contain
But what are you now? MS's lawyer?

But what would you want to remove claims that you think are ridiculous? That's the question really isn't it, not about whether or not you find them ridiculous.

(June 2, 2013 at 2:14 pm)ideologue08 Wrote: But what would you want to remove claims that you think are ridiculous? That's the question really isn't it, not about whether or not you find them ridiculous.

I wouldn't said I wanted to removed, just in a better category, considering the contents... I mean cats? Really?

Anyway its real hard to gauge people intentions over the web.

(June 2, 2013 at 2:25 pm)LastPoet Wrote: Anyway its real hard to gauge people intentions over the web.

That's true yeah.

(June 2, 2013 at 1:54 pm)ideologue08 Wrote: You're right, I probably do have a poor definition... but she also threatened to "move the whole shebang to the humor forum", so you gotta cut me some slack here

Usually when I'm on official business, you'll know about it. Since these threads are tickling my funny bone, I thought I would hop on the bandwagon and say silly stuff that has nothing to do with reality. Sorry if I confused you.

On that note, I was indeed serious about MS spamming threads. If he indeed has an valid opinion on the matter at hand, he could have done a better job presenting his 'evidence'. The whole 'Intelligent Design, Proof [X]' makes it sound not like his own idea (especially since MS gets his Roman numerals wrong) and that he's just copypastaing from elsewhere. If he had indeed been serious about this, why not start only one thread, discuss and eventually introduce new proof to prove his point?

(June 2, 2013 at 2:00 pm)ideologue08 Wrote:

(June 2, 2013 at 1:58 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: The Forum doesn't mourn the loss of a theist.

Fixed.

And stop playing the persecuted card, the last member who used our forums as a platform for his agenda without regards for creating discussion was in fact an atheist, and he was banned.