Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 5, 2013 at 2:58 pm
(June 5, 2013 at 2:51 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: (June 5, 2013 at 1:08 pm)Godschild Wrote: Yes it does, streams and mists watered the earth.
As they do today, but where does it state that there was no rain at all before the global flood? I think you're just parroting some Hovind nonsense.
Well once you get your brains scrambled by Ray Comfort's biblical bullshit biology Banana man, you can only go out of the crack house into the ally where Hovind lives.
Posts: 7155
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 5, 2013 at 3:01 pm
(This post was last modified: June 5, 2013 at 3:01 pm by Tonus.)
(June 5, 2013 at 2:56 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: 2 Sam 22:16 And the channels of the sea appeared,
That's just a prophecy telling us that we'll find televisions when we discover Atlantis.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 5, 2013 at 3:03 pm
(This post was last modified: June 5, 2013 at 3:05 pm by Doubting Thomas.)
(June 5, 2013 at 2:56 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: FUCKING LEVITICUS CHAPTER FUCKING 15[/url] IS SOMEONE'S IDEA OF GOOD HYGIENE ADVICE?
The same book which says that if you touch a menstruating woman you are unclean too and houses can have leprosy. Yeah real good scientific advice there.
(June 5, 2013 at 3:01 pm)Tonus Wrote: (June 5, 2013 at 2:56 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: 2 Sam 22:16 And the channels of the sea appeared,
That's just a prophecy telling us that we'll find televisions when we discover Atlantis.
If marine biologists were to discover a saltwater catfish they'd be claiming this passage foretold it.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 5, 2013 at 3:05 pm
That book has never displayed any lick of scientific understanding of reality because it was not written by people who had any modern understanding of scientific reality. No part of it ever. It displays one thing and one thing only, humans have vivid imaginations.
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 5, 2013 at 3:11 pm
I remember on (I think it was) another forum where some Muslim was claiming that the Koran was a scientifically accurate book because there was a passage which said something like "All iron comes from Allah in heaven." The claim was that since meteorites contain iron this passage is scientifically accurate. When it was pointed out that most of earth's core is made up of iron, they claimed that "all iron comes from heaven" meant that the iron came from heaven when the earth was formed or some nonsense.
Face it, there's no winning with these idiots because they all want to shoehorn modern scientific knowledge into their ancient texts. Even the most remotely similar-sounding passages will be used to claim that this or that holy book was always way ahead of science.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Posts: 67288
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 5, 2013 at 3:16 pm
It would seem that just as the jews wandering the desert felt compelled to make themselves idols...our modern spiritual successors to those same characters cannot help but worship at the altar of another.
Ah, such wonderful things can be injected into the stories we tell....
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 5336
Threads: 198
Joined: June 24, 2010
Reputation:
77
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 5, 2013 at 3:25 pm
(June 5, 2013 at 3:03 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: The same book which says that if you touch a menstruating woman you are unclean too and houses can have leprosy. Yeah real good scientific advice there.
That one really was the grand finale. I mean, seriously. We're not just talking about post hoc interpretations of cheery picked passages retrofitted to resemble modern scientific understanding of the universe while under the influence of confirmation bias to make the spurious assumption that there could be no natural or coincidental explanation and so GodWroteIt is the only option.
All that stuff I expected.
No, we're way past that point on the last one. Some apologist actually read Lev 15 and (1) thought it would be a good idea to draw any attention to it and (2) seriously thought it was good advice on hygiene at all, never mind advice that could only have come from a divine source.
I do understand this correctly? Right? Someone actually read Lev 15 and thought "Wow, this is good advice. We need to run this to print and share this!"? You see why I was so stunned? Why I broke with my usual style and typed in all caps and swore twice?
Fuck me!
Apologetics is truly the profession for those who have no shame.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 5, 2013 at 4:18 pm
I read Leviticus back when I was still a believer and even then I laughed at the idea of houses having leprosy. I think my thought was "What kind of backwards, superstitious shit is this?" Too bad I didn't make that connection with the rest of the book until later.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Posts: 8781
Threads: 26
Joined: March 15, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 5, 2013 at 4:30 pm
(June 5, 2013 at 2:51 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: (June 5, 2013 at 1:08 pm)Godschild Wrote: Yes it does, streams and mists watered the earth.
As they do today, but where does it state that there was no rain at all before the global flood? I think you're just parroting some Hovind nonsense.
Don't be lazy go look it up I'm not your personal slave.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 5, 2013 at 4:39 pm
Translation: "It doesn't."
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
|