The official stance of the organization is opposite of what its spokesperson says it is?

"Spiritual death", pfft. Let's disregard the fact that Romans 1:32 (Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death) is directly referencing God's righteous decree in Leviticus 20:13 (They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.). It is obvious that the Bible is very super extra definitely calling for violent, physical death and very super extra definitely not 'spiritual death', but let's assume that this clumsy and obviously modern reinterpretation is actually what the Bible means. How many Christians do you think make that distinction (or even care to)? At best, the official statement is disingenuous. The media relations gentleman suggests that it is a lie.

There seem to be a lot of dick crimes in the OT.

Uptight motherfuckers I guess.

I don't give to "the Salvos" anymore. Haven't for a long time

Christians: hiding behind psychopathy in the name of God.

You're being as twisted as the media whore there Ryan. I'm sure you're not always so generous to media scum. Yes that's the only interpretation. Sensationalise it all you will.

The SA is a religious movement primarily, so if you have religious objections then yes, you could justifiably want your charity to go elsewhere. I know a lot about them obviously. I'm no longer on the books, I fought hard to be removed when I became an atheist. I specifically hate any kind if traditionalism. I do know that in their charity work the administration costs are met largely by the membership, so that public donations go directly to the cause.

(June 6, 2013 at 11:33 pm)Ryantology Wrote: http://www.examiner.com/article/salvatio...t-to-death

My favorite part is when the fucktard admits that the Christian idea of 'love' is really just killing everybody whom Scripture says God wants dead. Ladies and gentlemen, Christian charity.

Pfft, you're an idiot.

(June 7, 2013 at 4:20 am)fr0d0 Wrote: You're being as twisted as the media whore there Ryan. I'm sure you're not always so generous to media scum. Yes that's the only interpretation. Sensationalise it all you will.

The SA is a religious movement primarily, so if you have religious objections then yes, you could justifiably want your charity to go elsewhere. I know a lot about them obviously. I'm no longer on the books, I fought hard to be removed when I became an atheist. I specifically hate any kind if traditionalism. I do know that in their charity work the administration costs are met largely by the membership, so that public donations go directly to the cause.

Don't worry Fr0ds, It can't beat the catholics... yet

News @ 11