Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Defense of marriage act is unconstitutional
June 26, 2013 at 5:19 pm
(June 26, 2013 at 5:13 pm)Rahul Wrote: He'll be thankful for it when he finally realizes that he only hates gays because of his repressed homosexuality.
Tell me this sweater vest doesn't look gay:
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Defense of marriage act is unconstitutional
June 26, 2013 at 5:32 pm
(This post was last modified: June 26, 2013 at 5:32 pm by Jackalope.)
(June 26, 2013 at 5:19 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: (June 26, 2013 at 5:13 pm)Rahul Wrote: He'll be thankful for it when he finally realizes that he only hates gays because of his repressed homosexuality.
Tell me this sweater vest doesn't look gay
It's not gay, it's positively fabulous.
Posts: 5336
Threads: 198
Joined: June 24, 2010
Reputation:
77
RE: Defense of marriage act is unconstitutional
June 26, 2013 at 6:55 pm
(June 26, 2013 at 3:09 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Add in the disastrous ruling on the Voting Rights Act of just a day ago and we see a growing divide between the liberal coasts and the fascist south/west being codified by state law.
So temper the enthusiasm with a dose of reality. There is a long way to go in this country.
I too worry that we won a battle today but are losing a bigger war. Citizens United + the Voting Rights Act going bye-bye means it's going to be much harder to avert our slide into fascism. Gay rights is nice and all but if we're all being crushed beneath a corporate jackboot, it's going to be a cold comfort to think we're all equal in our enslavement.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: Defense of marriage act is unconstitutional
June 26, 2013 at 7:36 pm
(June 26, 2013 at 3:09 pm)Minimalist Wrote: If only the state government can decide to bring an appeals ruling forward what the court has done is sanctify TWO Americas.
I've got a question for you Min., since you're the resident historian. Is the country becoming increasingly more divided politically in the last two decades, or has it always been this way?
Posts: 5598
Threads: 112
Joined: July 16, 2012
Reputation:
74
RE: Defense of marriage act is unconstitutional
June 26, 2013 at 9:42 pm
(June 26, 2013 at 7:36 pm)Faith No More Wrote: (June 26, 2013 at 3:09 pm)Minimalist Wrote: If only the state government can decide to bring an appeals ruling forward what the court has done is sanctify TWO Americas.
I've got a question for you Min., since you're the resident historian. Is the country becoming increasingly more divided politically in the last two decades, or has it always been this way?
152 years ago, conservatives broke from the Union and started a war because the guy they didn't want elected might end their right to own human beings as property.
Today, they only sit around on TheBlaze and Breitbart and, faced with more proof of the doom of their hick-ass ideology, make threats none of them would ever carry out as it would require putting down the Miller Lite for five minutes and leaving the singlewide. I'd say we've added by subtraction.
Posts: 2610
Threads: 22
Joined: May 18, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Defense of marriage act is unconstitutional
June 26, 2013 at 9:55 pm
Only a portion is deemed unConstitutional. They did not rule on Prop 8 to keep gay marriage still illegal in most of the United States.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Posts: 7085
Threads: 69
Joined: September 11, 2012
Reputation:
84
RE: Defense of marriage act is unconstitutional
June 26, 2013 at 10:42 pm
(June 26, 2013 at 9:55 pm)Polaris Wrote: Only a portion is deemed unConstitutional. They did not rule on Prop 8 to keep gay marriage still illegal in most of the United States.
Wait... what? Can you rephrase?
Posts: 1424
Threads: 65
Joined: February 11, 2013
Reputation:
26
RE: Defense of marriage act is unconstitutional
June 26, 2013 at 10:53 pm
(June 26, 2013 at 10:42 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: (June 26, 2013 at 9:55 pm)Polaris Wrote: Only a portion is deemed unConstitutional. They did not rule on Prop 8 to keep gay marriage still illegal in most of the United States.
Wait... what? Can you rephrase?
I think he's saying what I said a few pages back, but in a much shittier manner.
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Defense of marriage act is unconstitutional
June 26, 2013 at 11:40 pm
(June 26, 2013 at 7:36 pm)Faith No More Wrote: (June 26, 2013 at 3:09 pm)Minimalist Wrote: If only the state government can decide to bring an appeals ruling forward what the court has done is sanctify TWO Americas.
I've got a question for you Min., since you're the resident historian. Is the country becoming increasingly more divided politically in the last two decades, or has it always been this way?
I think the country has become more fascistic as a whole in the last 40 years and it manifests itself in such subtle ways as the extreme right which wants to shoot border crossers on sight while the center is content to spend billions for a fence. The left, such as it is, is shut out of the debate.
A large part of this is driven by the (correct) observation that the country is changing and angry old white guys find themselves facing a future in which they or their kids will be a minority. We are seeing attempts to cling to power.
Consider as an analogy this scene from 1960's Spartacus. Crassus represents the entrenched upper classes and Caesar represents the "mob" and Mitt Romney told us in no uncertain terms who they are.
Posts: 2610
Threads: 22
Joined: May 18, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Defense of marriage act is unconstitutional
June 26, 2013 at 11:46 pm
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2013 at 12:01 am by Polaris.)
(June 26, 2013 at 10:42 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: (June 26, 2013 at 9:55 pm)Polaris Wrote: Only a portion is deemed unConstitutional. They did not rule on Prop 8 to keep gay marriage still illegal in most of the United States.
Wait... what? Can you rephrase?
They did not strike down the DOMA sections that allow states the freedom to not recognize same-sex laws of other states.
Had they ruled on Prop 8, they likely would have struck down the constitutional basis for states to make homosexual marriage illegal. Such a motion had been expected for weeks. That means them not taking up Prop 8 means the fight might last for years to come unless a new case is brought to the Supreme Court, one which they can't simply dismiss it on legalistic grounds.
And no CleanedShaved, that's not what you half-assedly posted. Had the entirety of DOMA been voted down, all US anti-homosexual laws could be declared invalid by reciprocity.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
|