Defense of marriage act is unconstitutional

[Doubting Thomas]

He'll be thankful for it when he finally realizes that he only hates gays because of his repressed homosexuality.

Tell me this sweater vest doesn't look gay:

[Jackalope]

He'll be thankful for it when he finally realizes that he only hates gays because of his repressed homosexuality.

Tell me this sweater vest doesn't look gay

It's not gay, it's positively fabulous.

[DeistPaladin]

Add in the disastrous ruling on the Voting Rights Act of just a day ago and we see a growing divide between the liberal coasts and the fascist south/west being codified by state law.

So temper the enthusiasm with a dose of reality. There is a long way to go in this country.

I too worry that we won a battle today but are losing a bigger war. Citizens United + the Voting Rights Act going bye-bye means it's going to be much harder to avert our slide into fascism. Gay rights is nice and all but if we're all being crushed beneath a corporate jackboot, it's going to be a cold comfort to think we're all equal in our enslavement.

[Faith No More]

If only the state government can decide to bring an appeals ruling forward what the court has done is sanctify TWO Americas.

I've got a question for you Min., since you're the resident historian. Is the country becoming increasingly more divided politically in the last two decades, or has it always been this way?

[Ryantology]

If only the state government can decide to bring an appeals ruling forward what the court has done is sanctify TWO Americas.

I've got a question for you Min., since you're the resident historian. Is the country becoming increasingly more divided politically in the last two decades, or has it always been this way?

152 years ago, conservatives broke from the Union and started a war because the guy they didn't want elected might end their right to own human beings as property.

Today, they only sit around on TheBlaze and Breitbart and, faced with more proof of the doom of their hick-ass ideology, make threats none of them would ever carry out as it would require putting down the Miller Lite for five minutes and leaving the singlewide. I'd say we've added by subtraction.

[Polaris]

Only a portion is deemed unConstitutional. They did not rule on Prop 8 to keep gay marriage still illegal in most of the United States.

[rexbeccarox]

Only a portion is deemed unConstitutional. They did not rule on Prop 8 to keep gay marriage still illegal in most of the United States.

Wait... what? Can you rephrase?

[CleanShavenJesus]

Only a portion is deemed unConstitutional. They did not rule on Prop 8 to keep gay marriage still illegal in most of the United States.

Wait... what? Can you rephrase?

I think he's saying what I said a few pages back, but in a much shittier manner.

[Minimalist]

If only the state government can decide to bring an appeals ruling forward what the court has done is sanctify TWO Americas.

I've got a question for you Min., since you're the resident historian. Is the country becoming increasingly more divided politically in the last two decades, or has it always been this way?

I think the country has become more fascistic as a whole in the last 40 years and it manifests itself in such subtle ways as the extreme right which wants to shoot border crossers on sight while the center is content to spend billions for a fence. The left, such as it is, is shut out of the debate.

A large part of this is driven by the (correct) observation that the country is changing and angry old white guys find themselves facing a future in which they or their kids will be a minority. We are seeing attempts to cling to power.

Consider as an analogy this scene from 1960's Spartacus. Crassus represents the entrenched upper classes and Caesar represents the "mob" and Mitt Romney told us in no uncertain terms who they are.

[Polaris]

Only a portion is deemed unConstitutional. They did not rule on Prop 8 to keep gay marriage still illegal in most of the United States.

Wait... what? Can you rephrase?

They did not strike down the DOMA sections that allow states the freedom to not recognize same-sex laws of other states.

Had they ruled on Prop 8, they likely would have struck down the constitutional basis for states to make homosexual marriage illegal. Such a motion had been expected for weeks. That means them not taking up Prop 8 means the fight might last for years to come unless a new case is brought to the Supreme Court, one which they can't simply dismiss it on legalistic grounds.

And no CleanedShaved, that's not what you half-assedly posted. Had the entirety of DOMA been voted down, all US anti-homosexual laws could be declared invalid by reciprocity.