Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 12:16 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
Question for our resident creationist(s)

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Question for our resident creationist(s)
Creed of Heresy Offline
The Heresiarch
Religious Views: Humanism -> Golden/Silver Rules -> Anti-theist
Posts: 3179
Threads: 197
Joined: February 18, 2012
Reputation: 72
#61
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 18, 2013 at 3:39 am
Not I.
Find
Reply
pshun2404 Offline
Newbie
*
Religious Views: could be might be
Posts: 4
Threads: 1
Joined: August 17, 2013
Reputation: 0
#62
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 18, 2013 at 4:19 am
(August 13, 2013 at 11:15 am)CleanShavenJesus Wrote: Oh, the answer is the egg, if anybody was wondering. Of course, the egg coming first would require an acceptance of evolution. Otherwise, God magically made the chickens appear on Earth when it was made 6,000 years ago.

The problem CSJ is that most Christians are not young earth creationists, even the early fathers took Genesis 1 alone as being 6,00 years and I know quite a few Old world creationists who see Genesis 1 as generalized to speak of stages where "day" is used to mean so many different things...however the Geological column supports chicken as the answer (just say'n)...fully formed creatures suddenly appear (even in the Cambrian) nothing in science can demonstrate the egg came first so I go with chickenWink Shades

pshun2404
Find
Reply
Esquilax Offline
A Death Star for bad arguments.
*****
Religious Views: AF's own William Lane Craig
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation: 123
#63
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 18, 2013 at 4:26 am
(August 18, 2013 at 4:19 am)pshun2404 Wrote: The problem CSJ is that most Christians are not young earth creationists, even the early fathers took Genesis 1 alone as being 6,00 years and I know quite a few Old world creationists who see Genesis 1 as generalized to speak of stages where "day" is used to mean so many different things...however the Geological column supports chicken as the answer (just say'n)...fully formed creatures suddenly appear (even in the Cambrian) nothing in science can demonstrate the egg came first so I go with chickenWink Shades

pshun2404

Are you... you can't... I just... It...

Are you being serious, here? Please, please tell me you're just trolling for funsies... Tongue
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Find
Reply
downbeatplumb Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Religious Views: What is a God anyway?
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation: 82
#64
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 18, 2013 at 4:49 am
(August 18, 2013 at 4:19 am)pshun2404 Wrote:
(August 13, 2013 at 11:15 am)CleanShavenJesus Wrote: Oh, the answer is the egg, if anybody was wondering. Of course, the egg coming first would require an acceptance of evolution. Otherwise, God magically made the chickens appear on Earth when it was made 6,000 years ago.

The problem CSJ is that most Christians are not young earth creationists, even the early fathers took Genesis 1 alone as being 6,00 years and I know quite a few Old world creationists who see Genesis 1 as generalized to speak of stages where "day" is used to mean so many different things...however the Geological column supports chicken as the answer (just say'n)...fully formed creatures suddenly appear (even in the Cambrian) nothing in science can demonstrate the egg came first so I go with chickenWink Shades

pshun2404

The evolution of eggs pre-dates the evolution of birds by millions of years,so the egg came first.
What about this do you not understand?



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Find
Reply
Darwinian Offline
Original Admin - Retired
*****
Religious Views: Hoopy Frood
Posts: 4349
Threads: 385
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation: 57
#65
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 18, 2013 at 5:34 am
(August 18, 2013 at 4:19 am)pshun2404 Wrote: nothing in science can demonstrate the egg came first so I go with chickenWink Shades

The egg came first, else where did the chicken come from? Also, dinosaurs laid eggs long before chickens existed.
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Find
Reply
Edwardo Piet Away
Devil's Supercardo.
Religious Views: Atheistic panexperientialism
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation: 133
#66
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 18, 2013 at 5:35 am
The proto-chicken laid the chicken egg.
Find
Reply
Darwinian Offline
Original Admin - Retired
*****
Religious Views: Hoopy Frood
Posts: 4349
Threads: 385
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation: 57
#67
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 18, 2013 at 5:39 am
And the proto-proto-chicken laid the proto-chicken egg, and so on and so forth, all the way back to the first life form Dodgy
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Find
Reply
Edwardo Piet Away
Devil's Supercardo.
Religious Views: Atheistic panexperientialism
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation: 133
#68
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 18, 2013 at 5:43 am
Yes, despite the reality that the first one was awfully amobea seeming and non bird-seeming. It is indeed is quite peculiar.
Find
Reply
Nine Offline
Bee-ad
****
Religious Views: Queen Bee
Posts: 4344
Threads: 43
Joined: February 21, 2012
Reputation: 64
#69
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 18, 2013 at 5:46 am
I think the most important thing about the chicken and the egg is that they both taste great.
Find
Reply
Edwardo Piet Away
Devil's Supercardo.
Religious Views: Atheistic panexperientialism
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation: 133
#70
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 18, 2013 at 5:48 am
The most important thing is that I myself personally is that I get to personally tase them, I think. I get to selfishly taste them, which is phenomenologically the same thing as personally, I believe.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
Question for our resident creationist(s)

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Creationist Equivocation Objectivist 28 4051 December 24, 2022 at 5:08 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
Bug The Voyage That Shook The World (2009) - Creationist BS masquerading as science Duty 7 924 September 8, 2020 at 5:32 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  The Creationist that Ken Ham calls "stupid" drfuzzy 3 1937 May 7, 2016 at 8:23 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy
  A Creationist answered 10 questions . . . drfuzzy 26 8667 December 11, 2015 at 10:18 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  search Science Related topics Dinosaur Creationist: The Flintstones was a zebo-the-fat 24 5189 May 28, 2015 at 9:23 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Hope For Our Resident Jesus Freaks? Minimalist 2 1482 September 29, 2014 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Creationist Senators block fossil bill Bittersmart 119 27379 April 5, 2014 at 10:42 pm
Last Post: ThomM
  Pat Robertson implores creationist Ken Ham to shut up Gooders1002 24 5209 February 10, 2014 at 7:53 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  If these resident theists really talk to god.. Brakeman 283 91612 October 1, 2013 at 8:47 pm
Last Post: Drich
  Do creationist know that what they are doing is wrong? Nerd 3 2149 March 24, 2013 at 9:33 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)