Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 10:24 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
(August 27, 2013 at 8:51 am)Sword of Christ Wrote:
(August 27, 2013 at 12:55 pm)Texas Sailor Wrote: Part of believing in God is knowing a basic rule required to be followed by all who believe:

1. God just is. He is all. His existence is immune to the inquiry of origin. His abilities and attributes are immune to logical laws.

Once convinced of this, they think the following to be quite obvious,and in fact feel quite confident in fabricating the following...

2. God is the origin of all things. Logical laws are prescribed by him. No ability or attribute held by God can be rationally understood by man.


The third rule is excersised quite frequently here, which is:

Any objection to rule 2, refer to rule 1.

God doesn't have an origin, I keep having to repeat this point for some reason.
We object to that, you refer us to rule 1. First 3 words were?

Thanks for proving my point.
Reply
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
(August 27, 2013 at 2:41 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote:
(August 27, 2013 at 12:55 pm)Texas Sailor Wrote: Part of believing in God is knowing a basic rule required to be followed by all who believe:

1. God just is. He is all. His existence is immune to the inquiry of origin. His abilities and attributes are immune to logical laws.

Once convinced of this, they think the following to be quite obvious,and in fact feel quite confident in fabricating the following...

2. God is the origin of all things. Logical laws are prescribed by him. No ability or attribute held by God can be rationally understood by man.


The third rule is excersised quite frequently here, which is:

Any objection to rule 2, refer to rule 1.

God doesn't have an origin, I keep having to repeat this point for some reason.

Quote:"Why can't the universe not have an origin?"

1) The universe began to exist

2) If there are physical laws that created the BB they all began to exist effected by a cause as well

3) You have to start the ball rolling from somewhere else the ball would never roll

4) You need an explanation for anything/everything that exists that begins to exist

Honestly, are you reading back everything you type before you submit it? Why is it that the universe must have a beginning, but God is allowed to have always exsted?

You keep saying it's impossible for the universe to just be. You want a beginning to it. But it's possible for God to just be? There's no beginning of/for him? On what grounds can you say this? Why doesn't God have to follow the four "laws" you put out for the universe?
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water

[Image: YAAgdMk.gif]



Reply
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
Fucking spirits, claiming to avoid the perils of reality but still managing to influence the big bang...
Reply
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
(August 27, 2013 at 3:26 pm)CleanShavenJesus Wrote: You keep saying it's impossible for the universe to just be.

The universe began, everything exist and is physical began. Everything that begins is caused by something that made it begin. So it can't just be nothing can just be if it was made by something else that's the point. What you're suggesting isn't logical or practical.


Quote:You want a beginning to it.

EVERYTHING that physically exists ANYWHERE that ever came into existence had a BEGINNING there are NO exceptions. None. Ever.


Quote:But it's possible for God to just be?

Yes because God doesn't physically exist and nothing made him begin to exist, he is the cause and everything else is an effect from a cause. It's not just me asserting this as my own opinion this is deduction. This is what we can know. You don't take this on faith you take this as logic.


Quote:There's no beginning of/for him? On what grounds can you say this?

You can't have an effect, of an effect, of an effect, of an effect, of an effect, of an effect, of an effect etc forever because each effect would have been produced by an infinite number of other effects but no effect would ever have been produced to start with if it took an infinity of things to happen in order to get to whatever it was that did happen. There can only be a finite number of effects and everything has to start from one cause. This cause is God.



Quote:Why doesn't God have to follow the four "laws" you put out for the universe?

God made the four laws to begin with, he is the cause of everything that exists including all the physical laws.
Come all ye faithful joyful and triumphant.
Reply
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
(August 27, 2013 at 3:48 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote: EVERYTHING that physically exists ANYWHERE that ever came into existence had a BEGINNING there are NO exceptions. None. Ever.

Then what was your god's beginning? No exceptions, remember.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
(August 27, 2013 at 3:48 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote: because God doesn't physically exist

You know what else doesn't "physically exist"....... non-existent things.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
Is it just me or does this guy resemble jstrodel, with less spittle?
Reply
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
(August 27, 2013 at 3:50 pm)Maelstrom Wrote: Then what was your god's beginning? No exceptions, remember.

God is the cause of all things that begin to exist not the exception. Unless you're saying nothing caused everything to exist? But then nothing would exist would it? Think about this one.
Come all ye faithful joyful and triumphant.
Reply
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
(August 27, 2013 at 3:54 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Is it just me or does this guy resemble jstrodel, with less spittle?

I was thinking the same thing, but I did not mention it because I am usually wrong about everything I assume in terms of who could be who.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
(August 27, 2013 at 3:48 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote:


What causes virtual particles to exist, cupcake?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] Could an omnipotent and omniscient god prove that he was God? Jehanne 136 13757 January 26, 2023 at 11:33 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Does Ezekiel 23:20 prove that God is an Incel Woah0 26 3659 September 17, 2022 at 5:12 pm
Last Post: Woah0
  Am I right to assume, that theists cannot prove that I am not god? Vast Vision 116 37703 March 5, 2021 at 6:39 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Theists: how do you account for psychopaths? robvalue 288 49232 March 5, 2021 at 6:37 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Theists: What do you mean when you say that God is 'perfect'? Angrboda 103 20617 March 5, 2021 at 6:35 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  What would you do if you found out God existed Catholic_Lady 545 99386 March 5, 2021 at 3:28 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Are there any theists here who think God wants, or will take care of, Global Warming? Duty 16 4159 January 19, 2020 at 11:50 am
Last Post: Smedders
  Turns out we were all wrong. Here's undeniable proof of god. EgoDeath 6 1588 September 16, 2019 at 11:18 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  "Don't take away people's hope" Brian37 96 12420 August 8, 2019 at 7:20 pm
Last Post: WinterHold
Thumbs Down 11-Year-Old Genius Proves Hawking Wrong About God Fake Messiah 7 1342 April 16, 2019 at 8:13 pm
Last Post: Succubus



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)