Posts: 2886
Threads: 132
Joined: May 8, 2011
Reputation:
31
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 8:21 am
Jesus Titty Fucking Christ, Grace. You are perhaps the most willfully ignorant person to ever grace this forum with a post. The level of denial of verifiable facts you exhibit in favor of your mythology has seldom if ever been seen here. Considering some of the silly shit that gets posted here on a depressingly regular basis that is saying quite a bit.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
Posts: 2171
Threads: 4
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
33
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 8:21 am
(October 8, 2013 at 8:18 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: (October 8, 2013 at 8:12 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Good o, now get those conditions to produce a figure of 6000 years
I think that you do not understand that with God all things are possible.
Translation: Fuck you you filthy atheist!
Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation:
38
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 8:25 am
(October 8, 2013 at 8:18 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: (October 8, 2013 at 8:12 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Good o, now get those conditions to produce a figure of 6000 years
I think that you do not understand that with God all things are possible.
Except that he can't even offer up proof he is real.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
48
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 8:28 am
(October 8, 2013 at 8:18 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: (October 8, 2013 at 8:12 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Good o, now get those conditions to produce a figure of 6000 years
I think that you do not understand that with God all things are possible.
Ahh, the good ol' god diddit defence, trotted out whenever the claimant doesn't actually have a fucking answer.
Thank you Gracie for proving what I suspected all along.
That you are yet another clueless cretinist with no fucking idea what the fuck you are on about.
Good day to you. There is nothing more I need to add to this conversation.
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 8:38 am
(October 8, 2013 at 8:18 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: I think that you do not understand that with God all things are possible.
If this is true in your baseless "god" assumption, then you should find it trivial to respond to the fact that I have conclusively proven that your god does not exist.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 352
Threads: 8
Joined: September 29, 2013
Reputation:
1
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 8:41 am
(October 8, 2013 at 8:38 am)Esquilax Wrote: (October 8, 2013 at 8:18 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: I think that you do not understand that with God all things are possible.
If this is true in your baseless "god" assumption, then you should find it trivial to respond to the fact that I have conclusively proven that your god does not exist.
If you had such a proof, the media would have it all over the world.
Send the proof to them.
Posts: 19646
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
91
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 8:41 am
This grace person reminds me of Statler Waldorf...
Both share the same mentality...
Everything that science has found has been skewed by god to make it look that way, but it's wrong... AND god is the real cause of it all...
And they fail to understand how twisted that view is... how it relies on the untenable assumption that there is such a thing as god.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 8:43 am
(October 8, 2013 at 8:41 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: If you had such a proof, the media would have it all over the world.
Send the proof to them.
Oh, what's that, Grace? Loud, repeated assertions that something has been proven by some stranger on the internet doesn't count as the conclusion to an argument?
hock:
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 352
Threads: 8
Joined: September 29, 2013
Reputation:
1
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 8:44 am
(October 8, 2013 at 8:43 am)Esquilax Wrote: (October 8, 2013 at 8:41 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: If you had such a proof, the media would have it all over the world.
Send the proof to them.
Oh, what's that, Grace? Loud, repeated assertions that something has been proven by some stranger on the internet doesn't count as the conclusion to an argument?
hock:
I presented my proof.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 8:47 am
(October 8, 2013 at 8:44 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: I presented my proof.
So did I. The difference being that, while you presented obvious misunderstandings of basic scientific concepts, devoid of context and completely lacking in references- aka, a flat assertion with no actual evidence backing it up- I and the others have presented you with actual, researched evidence from recognized scientific sources, replete with references.
I've been trying to get you to understand that just saying you've proven something does not make it so, especially when so many of us are correcting your errors and showing you competing scientific evidence from actual scientists, most of which you've ignored.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
|