@xpastor Another clue in about John is it's more developed theology in comparison to the other gospels, no?

(December 12, 2013 at 10:14 pm)Ksa Wrote: ^ You say it's non-sense, FINE. I require a Jew to verify this pronounciation and translate it:

"Hiku Mamtakeem, Vikulli Muhammadin, Zedudii Vei Zeyree, Banak Ieruszaleem."

You placed your head on the guillotine by challenging me, the second a Jew verifies the validity of that statement you're fried pal!

Oi-vey.

Maybe you can get your Jewish brother to sign onto your AF account using your screen name, so he being a separate person can verify what you have said.. Along with the phonetic spelling.. That way he does not have to bother with setting up a different account.


Oh, wait i think I might see a problem with that idea, you being a verified liar and all... Naw I think another unverifiable person, with 'proof' an unverifiable word, that no one on the planet has ever written anything about and posted it online will be just fine.

Yeah, so if you get your friend I mean random Jew, to verify your made up phrase and by using your logic everything that I said that has proven you a fool and a liar can be dismissed, because by your logic, my head is somehow in the chopping block, and everything I used (all of my reference material) will some how be dismissed because I don't know the meaning of a made up phrase, that no one on the planet has ever written anything about, but somehow is known to a random Jew that will magically appear and verify for you.


This will defiantly disprove that the Jews is John 10 were not try to stone Christ because they knew that He claimed to be On Par with God the Father.


So again does this word mean you lied about going to church?

You're still here? I thought you just died of embarrassment

Anyways, don't try that again or you will get embarrassed more and so you"ll have to use more of the ROFL guys...

lol

(December 12, 2013 at 10:31 pm)MindForgedManacle Wrote: @xpastor Another clue in about John is it's more developed theology in comparison to the other gospels, no?

Depth of theology only speaks to spiritual maturity. As Paul tells us we are a single member of the body of Christ. Not all members of the body function in the same way. Meaning we may not all have the same view in every topic

---

(December 12, 2013 at 10:54 pm)Ksa Wrote: You're still here? I thought you just died of embarrassment

Anyways, don't try that again or you will get embarrassed more and so you"ll have to use more of the ROFL guys...

lol

You're going to have to fly a plane into my house if you want to get me to stop challenging bad theology, or even general misrepresentations of Christianity.

So, you make another 281 bad posts and you get a medal?

(December 11, 2013 at 10:29 am)Drich Wrote:

(December 11, 2013 at 2:53 am)Aractus Wrote: Because you don't know your facts, and this has been proved to you time and time again.

Then by all means, show me. Show me where 'your facts' invalidate the teaching of Paul in Romans 7. Otherwise understand in order to hold to your doctrine you have to ignore the Teachings of Paul, and Christ to hide behind these elusive 'facts.'

That said, in all my time here I do not spend it correcting 'brothers in the faith' for two reason. One we are told not to do it publically. We are told to bring a matter of contention to them privately. Two, I understand that not all 'eat meat.' Meaning not everyone has to be on the same page or understanding of God. We are only called to be responsible for what we can comperhend. If your comperhension ties you to the Law, then know even if Paul and Christ give you the freedom to live apart from the law, that still means you have the freedom to live under the law as well. "For what you bind on earth will be bound in Heaven and what you loose on earth will also be loosed in Heaven."
Meaning in your freedom if you tie yourself to the law of moses then in Heaven it is by the law of moses you will be judged. If in your freedom you wish to tie yourself down then you have freedom to do so.

Your arrogance is exactly what I don't appreciate. You claimed that 2/3rds of the Bible (NT) is written by Paul, I disproved u, and yet you didn't even apologize for the mistake nor admit that you were mistaken. And that fact has nothing to do with faith.

As for correcting "brothers" in the faith, let me say this - it's the same thing I say to JW's that knock on my door. If you can prove to me that your quirky nonsense makes sense, then by all means prove it. Prove, for instance, that I should believe the Vulgate is holy inspired scripture?

Most of all prove to me that the Bible says to confess your sins to a priest 1. and 2. that oil and water achieve magical properties when blessed by a Catholic bishop - prove it.