http://areyouafeminist.com

(March 16, 2014 at 9:00 pm)NoraBrimstone Wrote: http://areyouafeminist.com

the only way feminism define women as being capable of equality is through voting rights business owning rights and pursuit of career. how is minority culture preserve in this way at all where was the first senate or parliment formed europe. Feminism teaches white supramacy. Leftists want to give black people that white people restricted for themselves because they feel this will attone for the crimes of the past

(March 16, 2014 at 9:07 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote:

(March 16, 2014 at 9:00 pm)NoraBrimstone Wrote: http://areyouafeminist.com

the only way feminism define women as being capable of equality is through voting rights business owning rights and pursuit of career. how is minority culture preserve in this way at all where was the first senate or parliment formed europe. Feminism teaches white supramacy. Leftists want to give black people that white people restricted for themselves because they feel this will attone for the crimes of the past

Is that just your opinion, or do you have anything to back up that (insane) claim? Because we've all shown you what feminism is, and you just keep reiterating that it's racist based on your own rantings that aren't based off anything factual.

(March 16, 2014 at 9:18 pm)Bittersmart Wrote:

(March 16, 2014 at 9:07 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: the only way feminism define women as being capable of equality is through voting rights business owning rights and pursuit of career. how is minority culture preserve in this way at all where was the first senate or parliment formed europe. Feminism teaches white supramacy. Leftists want to give black people that white people restricted for themselves because they feel this will attone for the crimes of the past

Is that just your opinion, or do you have anything to back up that (insane) claim? Because we've all shown you what feminism is, and you just keep reiterating that it's racist based on your own rantings that aren't based off anything factual.

look up how sociologists define the study of sociology- it details what society it not what it was or ought to be.......thats the subject were feminism is studied.
lol not based off anything factual kind of like religion you know feminism is kind of like a religion.... its been said

(March 16, 2014 at 9:20 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote:

(March 16, 2014 at 9:18 pm)Bittersmart Wrote: Is that just your opinion, or do you have anything to back up that (insane) claim? Because we've all shown you what feminism is, and you just keep reiterating that it's racist based on your own rantings that aren't based off anything factual.

look up how sociologists define the study of sociology- it details what society it not what it was or ought to be.......thats the subject were feminism is studied.
lol not based off anything factual kind of like religion you know feminism is kind of like a religion.... its been said

So, that's a no on anything backing up your claims, then. I'm done here.

(March 16, 2014 at 9:23 pm)Bittersmart Wrote:

(March 16, 2014 at 9:20 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: look up how sociologists define the study of sociology- it details what society it not what it was or ought to be.......thats the subject were feminism is studied.
lol not based off anything factual kind of like religion you know feminism is kind of like a religion.... its been said

So, that's a no on anything backing up your claims, then. I'm done here.

your done i never thought ide say this THANK GOD
im sorrry if that came off as mean but what im saying is true

(March 16, 2014 at 9:23 pm)Bittersmart Wrote:

(March 16, 2014 at 9:20 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: look up how sociologists define the study of sociology- it details what society it not what it was or ought to be.......thats the subject were feminism is studied.
lol not based off anything factual kind of like religion you know feminism is kind of like a religion.... its been said

So, that's a no on anything backing up your claims, then. I'm done here.

This clown makes claims but won't answer questions put to him, won't provide citation for his claims and has so far made three threads where he just rambles and repeats the same bullshit.

He and his enablers aren't worth the time of day to respond to them.

(March 16, 2014 at 9:26 pm)Beccs Wrote:

(March 16, 2014 at 9:23 pm)Bittersmart Wrote: So, that's a no on anything backing up your claims, then. I'm done here.

This clown makes claims but won't answer questions put to him, won't provide citation for his claims and has so far made three threads where he just rambles and repeats the same bullshit.

He and his enablers aren't worth the time of day to respond to them.

kind of like you do???? some evil man is responsible for everything that is wrong with the world

Beccs Wrote:He and his enablers aren't worth the time of day to respond to them.

That is becoming more and more apparent.

(March 16, 2014 at 9:28 pm)Bittersmart Wrote:

Beccs Wrote:He and his enablers aren't worth the time of day to respond to them.

That is becoming more and more apparent.

Just a little man who also tries to put words in others mouths.

I'm sure he's a regular poster on some of the "victimised men" websites blaming women for their own inadequacies.