Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 29, 2024, 9:54 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Historical Jesus is real and He rose from the grave
RE: The Historical Jesus is real and He rose from the grave
(April 4, 2014 at 5:01 pm)ShaMan Wrote: I'm not surprised that some (most) here won't be able to discern spiritual matters. After all... You're self-professed non-spiritualists. I do not expect you or any atheist/agnostic to apprehend spiritual matters - you've shut that door.

Says who? Personally I'm as spiritual as my basic rationality tempered by evidence allows. It's god-claims that my atheism addresses; nothing else about me is yours on which to speculate, based on that label alone, and how dare you presume to make that judgement, sir?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: The Historical Jesus is real and He rose from the grave
(April 7, 2014 at 11:14 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: "Kind" is extremely important and wish you wouldn't cast it to the side.

You want me to take that term seriously, you've only got to do one thing: define what it means in specific terms, and then stick to that definition regardless of all the problems we'll undoubtedly find with it.

See, most creationists use the term interchangeably with a variety of other, mutually exclusive scientific terms like species and genus and so on, so that they can have this magic handwavey thing to object to evolution with, without ever being held accountable to what it means. I'm sure you can see how dishonest such a tactic is, and so you'll surely have a definition of "kind" that you'll tell us before we get into an actual discussion on it, right?

Quote: Yes, when we pet a poodle we both can agree that this may of evolved over many many years from a different looking dog. But you lose me if you say that billions of years ago this evolved from a frog.

And again, merely asserting that without explaining the mechanism that would stop small changes from accumulating into larger ones isn't compelling. It's just an argument from incredulity; the fact that you think it's implausible isn't an argument against evolution, it's a demonstration of your inability to properly absorb facts.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: The Historical Jesus is real and He rose from the grave
(April 7, 2014 at 11:14 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: When the hardened Roman Centurian witness what He did at the cross two thousand years ago he said, "Certain, this was the Son of God!"

Again - that phrase is taken from the same book that makes the claim of his deity.
With that sort of logic, every religion can argue that they have proof of their deity simply by drawing attention to the witnesses they wrote in for themselves.

You mentioned that we can call you a 'Fool for Christ.' Sadly for you the word fool has a certain happy-go-lucky foppishness to it. The word is rather endearing in a way ... as if to say, "yes he's the town fool, but he's our beloved town fool." You sir are no such thing. You sir, are a blithering idiot.

Can we call you a blithering idiot for christ instead?
[Image: Evolution.png]

Reply
RE: The Historical Jesus is real and He rose from the grave
(March 28, 2014 at 10:39 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: He appeared to His disciples. These men's lives were changed and God used them to change the world.

And thank god for Jesus and his disciples! Without them there'd still be war today. And cruelty to animals and children. And starvation in impoverished nations. And greed and tyranny and murder and rape and intolerance and honor killings and wife beatings and pedophiles and...?

Thinking How did they change the world again?
There is an ALLLL-knowing, ALLLL-powerful, inVISible being who is everywhere, who created the WHOLE universe, who lives in another dimension called heaven, who is perfect in every way, who was never born and will never die, and who watches you every minute of every day (even when you're squeezing one out on the toilet). There are also unicorns, leprechauns, Santa Claus, an Easter Bunny, and a giant purple people eater.

JUST BELIEVE IT!
Reply
RE: The Historical Jesus is real and He rose from the grave
(April 8, 2014 at 2:11 am)Jiggerj Wrote: Thinking How did they change the world again?


they stopped the progression of humans for 1000+ years Undecided
[Image: Evolution.png]

Reply
RE: The Historical Jesus is real and He rose from the grave
Rev, let's try this: In your own words, tell us why you think atheists would find the testimony of the NT to be insufficient for establishing the truth of the claim that Jesus rose from the dead, was divine, etc. I ask because I'm pretty sure you don't get it.
Reply
RE: The Historical Jesus is real and He rose from the grave
(April 7, 2014 at 10:13 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:
(April 6, 2014 at 7:59 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: From the guy who rejects evolution despite overwhelming evidence, and supports Noah's Ark and the great flood despite any evidence, all this shows is how meaningless and subjective a Christian's understanding of "Truth" is.

Innumerable intellectuals, professionals, and even scientists embrace intelligent design. Over 80% of Americans believe there is a God. Name me one US President that was an atheist? Sir, you are in the minority.

Do you think the U.S. is representative of all of mankind? There have been, and are, atheist leaders in many countries.

(April 7, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:



Do you think that quoting someone else's bullshit without attribution is honest? Thou shalt not steal.

And do you actually think that the Institute for Creation Research is scientifically credible? Here's where you stole that text from.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: The Historical Jesus is real and He rose from the grave
(April 8, 2014 at 8:31 am)Chas Wrote: And do you actually think that the Institute for Creation Research is scientifically credible? Here's where you stole that text from.

I had a feeling it'd be something like that, but I wanted him to admit it himself.

Now, lemme just do my "creation science" bias check...

Ah, here we go!

ICR Wrote:All origins research must begin with a premise. ICR holds that the biblical record of primeval history in Genesis 1–11 is factual, historical, and clearly understandable and, therefore, that all things were created and made in six literal days.

Oh, so they start from the presupposition that the bible is one hundred percent correct before they write anything, huh? You mean, their approach to science is the complete opposite of the scientific method, which comes in with no preconceptions other than what the facts show, and have rigorous mechanisms in place to weed out biases based on previously held beliefs? Dodgy

Yeah, such a convincing piece of scientific literature, Rev. Rolleyes
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: The Historical Jesus is real and He rose from the grave
(April 8, 2014 at 9:07 am)Esquilax Wrote:
ICR Wrote:All origins research must begin with a premise. ICR holds that the biblical record of primeval history in Genesis 1–11 is factual, historical, and clearly understandable and, therefore, that all things were created and made in six literal days.

Oh, so they start from the presupposition that the bible is one hundred percent correct before they write anything, huh? You mean, their approach to science is the complete opposite of the scientific method, which comes in with no preconceptions other than what the facts show, and have rigorous mechanisms in place to weed out biases based on previously held beliefs? Dodgy

Yeah, such a convincing piece of scientific literature, Rev. Rolleyes

Of the myriad interactions with Stat, rev should proceed along the lines of:
"
No, science has its own preconceptions, presuppositions. That electrons always work in the same way. That photons always travel at the same speed in the same medium. That every single repeatable physical experiment always works the same way.
You cannot explain why it always works in the same way.
I explain it with god. God maintains everything and keeps everything in operation.
Furthermore, in the past, god made things work in a different way, so that what you perceive as billions of years, under your assumption, actually happened in a few thousands, which is in accordance with the biblical text.
So, clearly, science's presuppositions are clearly wrong and you can't rely on science for anything about the past.
"

There you go, rev, I did all your work, now enjoy Esq's (and every one else's) reply.
Reply
RE: The Historical Jesus is real and He rose from the grave
(April 8, 2014 at 10:39 am)pocaracas Wrote: Of the myriad interactions with Stat, rev should proceed along the lines of:
"
...
You cannot explain why it always works in the same way.
I explain it with god. God maintains everything and keeps everything in operation.
...
"

There's so much about presuppositionalism that is just so laughably batshit but for now this part is my favorite.

Essentially, it boils down to "Look! Nothing! That proves something!"

Or more specifically, "Look! Nothing unusual happened! That proves some unseen supernatural force must have acted upon it to prevent anything unusual from happening!"

It's a masterfully deft display of mental slight of hand. It turns zero evidence into evidence of its own kind.

You know what would be more impressive than nothing unusual happening?

Something unusual happening!
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I Bet "Jesus" Is Real Proud of These Shits Minimalist 34 7178 December 4, 2018 at 12:05 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Which Jesus is real? Silver 40 9321 August 9, 2017 at 11:52 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more. vorlon13 14 3444 August 1, 2017 at 2:54 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  lies, broken promises, racism : the real Jesus jenny1972 6 2144 November 4, 2015 at 3:23 pm
Last Post: jenny1972
  The Historical Reliability of the New Testament Randy Carson 706 135058 June 9, 2015 at 12:04 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Historical Easter Question for Minimalist thesummerqueen 26 8315 April 5, 2015 at 3:47 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  In Christianity, Does Jesus' Soul Have Anything To Do With Why Jesus Is God? JesusIsGod7 18 7837 October 7, 2014 at 12:58 pm
Last Post: JesusHChrist
  Mass grave discovered in an abandoned Catholic children's home. Esquilax 46 10617 June 11, 2014 at 1:57 pm
Last Post: Vox
  Jesus Would Role Over In His Grave Cinjin 7 2627 April 19, 2014 at 3:58 pm
Last Post: Confused Ape
  For People Who Think There Was No Historical Jesus Confused Ape 487 241850 May 11, 2013 at 4:40 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)