(April 27, 2014 at 10:18 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I am sorry, I would like to move to Argument #2. I said I would post 7 and would like to move ahead.

You can do both: I'm a patient guy and am willing to wait as long as you need to compose your debate posts, no worries. I just like debating evolution, and you seem very convinced of your position; you might be able to convert a few people with longer posts that'll attract an audience, like a debate would...

(April 27, 2014 at 10:05 pm)Beccs Wrote:

(April 27, 2014 at 10:02 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Sweet, road trip! I'll bring Luckie!

A free trip to the States?

I'm in.

But I won't go and put money in Ham's pocket.

I'll treat you to a tour of the Creation Museum,,,not a problem.

(April 27, 2014 at 10:18 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:

(April 27, 2014 at 9:52 pm)Esquilax Wrote: I doubt your conclusion is correct, but if you feel you can defend it, then come to the debate area, and put it to the test against me. To be clear, neither of us are scientists, so we're on an even playing field. If your ideas stand up to scrutiny, you should have no problems with this arrangement.

I am sorry, I would like to move to Argument #2. I said I would post 7 and would like to move ahead.

And how is this productive?

(April 27, 2014 at 10:21 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:

(April 27, 2014 at 10:05 pm)Beccs Wrote: A free trip to the States?

I'm in.

But I won't go and put money in Ham's pocket.

I'll treat you to a tour of the Creation Museum,,,not a problem.

THat's still putting money in his pocket and giving validation to his ridiculous "museum".

No thanks.

(April 27, 2014 at 10:21 pm)Esquilax Wrote:

(April 27, 2014 at 10:18 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I am sorry, I would like to move to Argument #2. I said I would post 7 and would like to move ahead.

You can do both: I'm a patient guy and am willing to wait as long as you need to compose your debate posts, no worries. I just like debating evolution, and you seem very convinced of your position; you might be able to convert a few people with longer posts that'll attract an audience, like a debate would...

Convert a few?

Maybe a few Atheists into a few Anti-theists...

(April 27, 2014 at 10:08 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:

(April 27, 2014 at 9:54 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I would only go if you pay for my plane ticket round trip, provide me room and board, and Stimbo, Esq, Steel Curtain, and Minimalist come as well.

Glad I made the cut!

It will be really hard to evade the tough questions, and one liners and non-answers and pleas to incredulity, ignorance, and Bible quotes wouldn't save you!

That's ok...if things go awry for me, all just ask you'll if we can step outside and settle things the ol' fashion way.

(April 27, 2014 at 10:13 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: As far as I'm concerned, he blew Tikaalik out of the water, no pun intended.

Addressed his main point on confusing what a transitional form is versus an animal with convergent evolution and the fact that the platypus is in no way a connection between animals like tiktaalik so.

Also.

(April 27, 2014 at 10:26 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: That's ok...if things go awry for me, all just ask you'll if we can step outside and settle things the ol' fashion way.

That's not what you want. I promise you.

(April 27, 2014 at 10:21 pm)Esquilax Wrote:

(April 27, 2014 at 10:18 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I am sorry, I would like to move to Argument #2. I said I would post 7 and would like to move ahead.

You can do both: I'm a patient guy and am willing to wait as long as you need to compose your debate posts, no worries. I just like debating evolution, and you seem very convinced of your position; you might be able to convert a few people with longer posts that'll attract an audience, like a debate would...

How do I go about suggesting a rule change for the board?

Try here.

Try not to be too upset if the answer's no, though.