Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 19, 2024, 4:48 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 27, 2014 at 10:18 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I am sorry, I would like to move to Argument #2. I said I would post 7 and would like to move ahead.

You can do both: I'm a patient guy and am willing to wait as long as you need to compose your debate posts, no worries. I just like debating evolution, and you seem very convinced of your position; you might be able to convert a few people with longer posts that'll attract an audience, like a debate would... Angel
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 27, 2014 at 10:05 pm)Beccs Wrote:
(April 27, 2014 at 10:02 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Sweet, road trip! I'll bring Luckie! Big Grin

A free trip to the States?

I'm in.

But I won't go and put money in Ham's pocket.

Wink Shades

I'll treat you to a tour of the Creation Museum,,,not a problem.
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 27, 2014 at 10:18 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:
(April 27, 2014 at 9:52 pm)Esquilax Wrote: I doubt your conclusion is correct, but if you feel you can defend it, then come to the debate area, and put it to the test against me. To be clear, neither of us are scientists, so we're on an even playing field. If your ideas stand up to scrutiny, you should have no problems with this arrangement. Thinking

I am sorry, I would like to move to Argument #2. I said I would post 7 and would like to move ahead.

And how is this productive?
PM me if you know where this is from "...knees in the breeze" and don't look it up!!
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 27, 2014 at 10:21 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:
(April 27, 2014 at 10:05 pm)Beccs Wrote: A free trip to the States?

I'm in.

But I won't go and put money in Ham's pocket.

Wink Shades

I'll treat you to a tour of the Creation Museum,,,not a problem.

THat's still putting money in his pocket and giving validation to his ridiculous "museum".

No thanks.

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 27, 2014 at 10:21 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(April 27, 2014 at 10:18 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I am sorry, I would like to move to Argument #2. I said I would post 7 and would like to move ahead.

You can do both: I'm a patient guy and am willing to wait as long as you need to compose your debate posts, no worries. I just like debating evolution, and you seem very convinced of your position; you might be able to convert a few people with longer posts that'll attract an audience, like a debate would... Angel

Convert a few?

Maybe a few Atheists into a few Anti-theists...
PM me if you know where this is from "...knees in the breeze" and don't look it up!!
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 27, 2014 at 10:08 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:
(April 27, 2014 at 9:54 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I would only go if you pay for my plane ticket round trip, provide me room and board, and Stimbo, Esq, Steel Curtain, and Minimalist come as well. Group Hug
Glad I made the cut!

It will be really hard to evade the tough questions, and one liners and non-answers and pleas to incredulity, ignorance, and Bible quotes wouldn't save you!

That's ok...if things go awry for me, all just ask you'll if we can step outside and settle things the ol' fashion way. Stooges
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 27, 2014 at 10:13 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: As far as I'm concerned, he blew Tikaalik out of the water, no pun intended.

Addressed his main point on confusing what a transitional form is versus an animal with convergent evolution and the fact that the platypus is in no way a connection between animals like tiktaalik so.

Also.



[Image: guilmon_evolution_by_davidgtm3-d4gb5rp.gif]https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOW_Ioi2wtuPa88FvBmnBgQ my youtube
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 27, 2014 at 10:26 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: That's ok...if things go awry for me, all just ask you'll if we can step outside and settle things the ol' fashion way. Stooges

That's not what you want. I promise you.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 27, 2014 at 10:21 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(April 27, 2014 at 10:18 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I am sorry, I would like to move to Argument #2. I said I would post 7 and would like to move ahead.

You can do both: I'm a patient guy and am willing to wait as long as you need to compose your debate posts, no worries. I just like debating evolution, and you seem very convinced of your position; you might be able to convert a few people with longer posts that'll attract an audience, like a debate would... Angel

How do I go about suggesting a rule change for the board?
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
Try here.

Try not to be too upset if the answer's no, though.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 29 Guest(s)