Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
|
Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
|
 RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 6, 2014 at 2:22 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2014 at 2:24 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(October 6, 2014 at 2:17 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index...656AATgFGx You know, answer.yahoo is second only to the bible in fecklessness, right?  RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 6, 2014 at 2:23 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2014 at 2:24 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(October 6, 2014 at 2:22 pm)Chuck Wrote:(October 6, 2014 at 2:17 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index...656AATgFGx Just for the record, are you saying this isn't true, and that in fact a fraction can include a decimal? RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 6, 2014 at 2:24 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2014 at 2:26 pm by Anomalocaris.)
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 6, 2014 at 2:26 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2014 at 2:28 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(October 6, 2014 at 2:24 pm)Chuck Wrote:(October 6, 2014 at 2:23 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Just for the record, are you saying this isn't true? you fool, the proper way to write that fraction is 1/2 you don't include decimal points. the decimal version of 1/2 is .5...smh and in what world does 23.7 = 237?  RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 6, 2014 at 2:27 pm
(October 6, 2014 at 2:05 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(October 6, 2014 at 2:03 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I honestly think Huggy might have a visual problem. He doesn't seem to be able to see the posts that directly answer his questions. Is that a prerequisite for LASIK? Yes. And it is a ratio.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.  RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 6, 2014 at 2:27 pm
(October 6, 2014 at 1:14 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I don't know how I can misconstrue the phrase "There is no such thing as fibonacci sequence" as meaning he doesn't believe the fibonacci sequence exists. I never said you misconstrued it. I said you cherry-picked it out of the post without any of the context of the rest of it, in which Chuck goes on to clarify what he means. By the same tactic, I can quote you as saying in your above words "I don't believe the fibonacci sequence exists." That's what cherry-picking means.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
 RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 6, 2014 at 2:28 pm
All hail Huggy, the determiner of convenient definitions and master of innumeracy.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 6, 2014 at 2:28 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2014 at 2:36 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(October 6, 2014 at 2:26 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(October 6, 2014 at 2:24 pm)Chuck Wrote: 1.0 / 2.0 That is technically not called the proper way of writting it. It is technically the vulgar (look it up) way of writting it. You nincompoop. (October 6, 2014 at 2:26 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(October 6, 2014 at 2:24 pm)Chuck Wrote: 1.0 / 2.0  You never reached fractions in you "education", and have no idea how they work beyond what you can look up in answer.yahoo, have you? Even 30 seconds of reading Wikipedia give enough basis for understanding fraction operation to make you look dumb. RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 6, 2014 at 2:31 pm
(October 6, 2014 at 2:26 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(October 6, 2014 at 2:24 pm)Chuck Wrote: 1.0 / 2.0 It seems like you only half listened in math class. 12.5/25 = 125/250 = 1.0/2.0 = 1/2 = 0.5 = .5 = 12/24 = 12000/24000 = 0.03/0.06 These are all valid ways of representing the same value. They are all the same number, the are all the same ratio.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method. RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 6, 2014 at 2:42 pm
(October 6, 2014 at 2:28 pm)Chuck Wrote:(October 6, 2014 at 2:26 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: you fool, the proper way to write that fraction is 1/2 you don't include decimal points. the decimal version of 1/2 is .5...smh look you muppet, we made it clear that as it relates 34 to the length of DNA and the 23.7 the width.. THIS WAS NEVER A FRACTION IN THE FIRST PLACE. We are talking whole numbers. So no 23.7 does not equal 237 |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
