(October 14, 2014 at 1:40 am)snowtracks Wrote:

(October 14, 2014 at 12:10 am)Darkstar Wrote: This isn't the kind of "intelligent design" that most Christians are talking about when they use the term. It has nothing whatsoever to do with gods of any sort. Also, I highly doubt that panspermia accepted as true by even a sizable minority of the scientific community, but even if aliens had seeded us, those aliens themselves would have had to have come from somewhere, rendering their "intelligent design" a moot point.

poster asked: where is science employed in detecting intelligent design? he didn't asked anything about 'christian' and I didn't post any opinion of seti or panspermia.

Congratulations, asshole: in doing your christian duty of being the most officious, passive aggressive conman you can possibly be, you have delayed having to be held accountable for the lack of justification for your position for exactly one more post! You must feel very proud, dragging this conversation down into the dirt to give yourself a few extra minutes of pretend superiority.

Now then: where is science employed in detecting intelligent design of divine or godlike origins, specifically as refers to the christian god's hand in the intelligent design of all reality.

I know you guys believe in magic and all, but you don't have to act like a fucking monkey's paw or evil genie, you know.

The answer to this question is simple,

That god was created in the image of man, not the other way around :p

(October 14, 2014 at 1:40 am)snowtracks Wrote: poster asked: where is science employed in detecting intelligent design? he didn't asked anything about 'christian' and I didn't post any opinion of seti or panspermia.

Looks like you are making progress, by leaving god out of any discussion of intelligent design.

IF a real god did exist - and it actually met the criteria of religion - then it would NOT have any reason to hide at all.

ANd that is the point -

(October 14, 2014 at 1:49 am)Esquilax Wrote:

(October 14, 2014 at 1:40 am)snowtracks Wrote: poster asked: where is science employed in detecting intelligent design? he didn't asked anything about 'christian' and I didn't post any opinion of seti or panspermia.

Congratulations, asshole: in doing your christian duty of being the most officious, passive aggressive conman you can possibly be, you have delayed having to be held accountable for the lack of justification for your position for exactly one more post! You must feel very proud, dragging this conversation down into the dirt to give yourself a few extra minutes of pretend superiority.

Now then: where is science employed in detecting intelligent design of divine or godlike origins, specifically as refers to the christian god's hand in the intelligent design of all reality.

I know you guys believe in magic and all, but you don't have to act like a fucking monkey's paw or evil genie, you know.

indications are that the atheistic fortress this one has build is starting to crumble. methinks he doth protest too much; truth is truly shaper than any two-edged sword.

(October 14, 2014 at 7:39 pm)snowtracks Wrote: indications are that the atheistic fortress this one has build is starting to crumble.

Oh! Of course! Science has suddenly taken a huge turn now that so many new discoveries have turned out to be caused by floating sky daddy.

Archeology has suddenly discovered the Tower of Babel, and the Arc of the Covenant, alone with the original stone tablets of moses. Not to mention the prophet bones that keep popping people back to life.

Astronomy has retracted the claim that the earth orbits the sun this week. Neil Tyson got saved!

Nasa found the missing Hour that physicists now admit is completely probable.


And of course geologists have just this week re-assessed the origin and cause of the Grand canyon.

What a sad week for science, and to think, Snowtracks knew this day was coming all along!!!

Ha Ha

(October 14, 2014 at 7:39 pm)snowtracks Wrote: indications are that the atheistic fortress this one has build is starting to crumble. methinks he doth protest too much; truth is truly shaper than any two-edged sword.

And now he follows up with an ad hominem, with a well-poisoning kicker.

Place your bets on what card he deals next, folks.

(October 14, 2014 at 7:39 pm)snowtracks Wrote: truth is truly shaper than any two-edged sword.

I don't know, swords are pretty shap!! How shap is the truth?

Snowtracks isn't very "sharp" or "shap."

They get boring once they give up and pretend that they were trolling the whole time.

(October 14, 2014 at 7:39 pm)snowtracks Wrote: indications are that the atheistic fortress this one has build is starting to crumble. methinks he doth protest too much; truth is truly shaper than any two-edged sword.

You do this every time. You act like the most evasive, dishonest tool, asserting the most ridiculous crap without evidence and then demanding that we debunk every stupid assertion that comes into your head, and then the moment that anyone gets sick of your idiocy and acts even a little bit angry, you crow victory.

But anger doesn't just come from failure, fool. And it doesn't invalidate my point. Answer my damn question, if you can.