Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 17, 2024, 12:33 am

Poll: Universal moral truths exist
This poll is closed.
I agree
21.43%
3 21.43%
I disagree
78.57%
11 78.57%
Total 14 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wrong"?
#31
RE: Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wr...
(October 30, 2014 at 9:17 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote:
(October 30, 2014 at 7:14 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote: Would this extend to being wrong for any advanced race anywhere in time or space?

So long as the concept of consent exists, yes.

But as was previously stated, it's not an objective natural law, it's entirely encompassed within the interactions of sentient beings.

I accept your answer just fine, but it differs with your conclusion. You conclude that for all advanced sentient beings rape is wrong, regardless of time location or public opinion. This is a truth you present as being without exception in time or space... making it universally true. How is it that there exists a truth that is larger than every advance civilization in the universe?

(October 30, 2014 at 9:25 pm)Chas Wrote:
(October 30, 2014 at 9:22 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote: So then... since you don't seem to want to take this seriously, lets narrow the field... Do you agree with me that it is NEVER good to rape a child, or do you hold it is SOMETIMES good?

Not serious? Did you actually read his answer?

Yes, I don't regard the discussion of the rape of a rock as serious Wink Therefore I narrowed it in terms that eliminate the rock from the equation Smile
Do you recall what was revealed the day the music died?
Reply
#32
RE: Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wr...
(October 30, 2014 at 9:41 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote:
(October 30, 2014 at 9:17 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: So long as the concept of consent exists, yes.

But as was previously stated, it's not an objective natural law, it's entirely encompassed within the interactions of sentient beings.

I accept your answer just fine, but it differs with your conclusion. You conclude that for all advanced sentient beings rape is wrong, regardless of time location or public opinion. This is a truth you present as being without exception in time or space... making it universally true. How is it that there exists a truth that is larger than every advance civilization in the universe?

You seem to be consistently conflating universality as applied by the subject with universality in and of itself.

It's a murky, deep area of the marsh that's being treaded on but your questions keep skipping across only the surface.

I already said that the person making the judgement as to it always being wrong is myself. I did not say that meant it was universally true absent of my particular judgement.
freedomfromfallacy » I'm weighing my tears to see if the happy ones weigh the same as the sad ones.
Reply
#33
RE: Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wr...
(October 30, 2014 at 9:46 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote:
(October 30, 2014 at 9:41 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote: I accept your answer just fine, but it differs with your conclusion. You conclude that for all advanced sentient beings rape is wrong, regardless of time location or public opinion. This is a truth you present as being without exception in time or space... making it universally true. How is it that there exists a truth that is larger than every advance civilization in the universe?

You seem to be consistently conflating universality as applied by the subject with universality in and of itself.

It's a murky, deep area of the marsh that's being treaded on but your questions keep skipping across only the surface.

I already said that the person making the judgement as to it always being wrong is myself. I did not say that meant it was universally true absent of my particular judgement.

So then do you alternatively believe that rape in and of itself is not wrong? It's "wrongness" only depends on ones opinion?
Do you recall what was revealed the day the music died?
Reply
#34
RE: Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wr...
(October 30, 2014 at 10:01 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote:
(October 30, 2014 at 9:46 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: You seem to be consistently conflating universality as applied by the subject with universality in and of itself.

It's a murky, deep area of the marsh that's being treaded on but your questions keep skipping across only the surface.

I already said that the person making the judgement as to it always being wrong is myself. I did not say that meant it was universally true absent of my particular judgement.

So then do you alternatively believe that rape in and of itself is not wrong? It's "wrongness" only depends on ones opinion?

I find it wrong in and of itself. The victims find it wrong. The perpetrators don't. I think they're assholes. That's how it goes, it's not rocket science.

The reason I don't accept universal truth in terms of morality is actually derived more from epistemology rather than being self-contained within its own branch of philosophy. To declare a universal truth is to declare absolute certainty on the matter. This is not possible. It's the same reason I consider myself an agnostic atheist rather than a gnostic one. I don't think my reasons for disbelieving in gods are lesser than those of a gnostic atheist, similarly, I don't think my reasons for universally considering rape as always wrong within valid contexts are any lesser than somebody that would claim it is universally true objectively speaking.

The difference is I don't assume the position of infallibility.
freedomfromfallacy » I'm weighing my tears to see if the happy ones weigh the same as the sad ones.
Reply
#35
RE: Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wr...
(October 30, 2014 at 10:13 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote:
(October 30, 2014 at 10:01 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote: So then do you alternatively believe that rape in and of itself is not wrong? It's "wrongness" only depends on ones opinion?

I find it wrong in and of itself. The victims find it wrong. The perpetrators don't. I think they're assholes. That's how it goes, it's not rocket science.

The reason I don't accept universal truth in terms of morality is actually derived more from epistemology rather than being self-contained within its own branch of philosophy. To declare a universal truth is to declare absolute certainty on the matter. This is not possible. It's the same reason I consider myself an agnostic atheist rather than a gnostic one. I don't think my reasons for disbelieving in gods are lesser than those of a gnostic atheist, similarly, I don't think my reasons for universally considering rape as always wrong within valid contexts are any lesser than somebody that would claim it is universally true objectively speaking.

The difference is I don't assume the position of infallibility.


Ok then. I do have a further question if you don't mind. You said:

"To declare a universal truth is to declare absolute certainty on the matter. This is not possible"

To declare with absolute certainty that universal truth does not exist, for instance saying it is universally true that rape is wrong, would be to imply that there would be times where rape is NOT wrong. To say "rape is universally not good" is either true, or there are times where it is good. Can you provide an example of rape being "Good" or is it then universally true that it isn't good?
Do you recall what was revealed the day the music died?
Reply
#36
RE: Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wr...
Tautologically, it's a nonsensical question, as "rape" already carries negative baggage..it"s just another way of saying "a -bad- sort of sexual behavior", otherwise you'd just say "sex". However, suppose we found ourselves with a situation where a culture did not develop the concept of consent? They would have no equivalence (/w our concepts) from which to even understand what we were talking about. Stranger cultural disconnects abound - though this one seems rooted in most of us. Nevertheless, in your hypothetical scenario there's one easy hypothetical example. He would still think it to be "univerally wrong", I would, perhaps you would (though I guess I shouldn't presume - care to make the case for rape friend, oh...no? ofc you don't, lol.....) but they (the ubiquitous they)...would not.

This isn't even remotely close to a deep philosophical quandry - there is no leverage. It's ridiculous bullshit we've seen on these boards a hundred times over. It's boring.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#37
RE: Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wr...
(October 30, 2014 at 8:27 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:
(October 30, 2014 at 7:12 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: Rape is indeed always wrong. However it is NOT an universal truth.
And the rules for circles don't apply to triangles. So what? Just because something only applies universally to all human moral agents has no bearing on whether it is objectively right or wrong. My but you do like to dance.
Don't make random analogies please. Physical properties and mental constructs are not the same thing.

Rape is wrong, because the term "rape" is used to represent a scenario with a victim and perpetrator/s, which is bad.

Rape IS NOT a universal truth, because the concept of rape doesn't exist in nature, nor is it applicable to all things.

Religion suggests we humans are higher than everything else in nature, and thus whatever moral laws apply to us universally must be the universal truth. But the truth is, we are animals too and since morality doesn't exist in all animals, it isn't a universal thing. Morality IS a subjective concept we humans created to better sustain our societal structure.

If you look at our laws you'll see that there has been many revisions to determine what exactly constitutes "rape", this had to be done, because the concept of "rape" is born from our society and is determined by it.



On child abuse, unless you specifically mean pedophilia, it does exist in nature among other species and isn't always immoral in the sense we see it in our society. Several animals, for example bears and snakes, might kill off weaker children so that the mother can survive and the species can progress with the strongest individuals. However in a human society, killing off a slightly deformed child will be treated as murder and highly immoral.
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu

Join me on atheistforums Slack Cool Shades (pester tibs via pm if you need invite) Tongue

Reply
#38
RE: Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wr...
(October 30, 2014 at 10:24 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote:
(October 30, 2014 at 10:13 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: I find it wrong in and of itself. The victims find it wrong. The perpetrators don't. I think they're assholes. That's how it goes, it's not rocket science.

The reason I don't accept universal truth in terms of morality is actually derived more from epistemology rather than being self-contained within its own branch of philosophy. To declare a universal truth is to declare absolute certainty on the matter. This is not possible. It's the same reason I consider myself an agnostic atheist rather than a gnostic one. I don't think my reasons for disbelieving in gods are lesser than those of a gnostic atheist, similarly, I don't think my reasons for universally considering rape as always wrong within valid contexts are any lesser than somebody that would claim it is universally true objectively speaking.

The difference is I don't assume the position of infallibility.


Ok then. I do have a further question if you don't mind. You said:

"To declare a universal truth is to declare absolute certainty on the matter. This is not possible"

To declare with absolute certainty that universal truth does not exist, for instance saying it is universally true that rape is wrong, would be to imply that there would be times where rape is NOT wrong. To say "rape is universally not good" is either true, or there are times where it is good. Can you provide an example of rape being "Good" or is it then universally true that it isn't good?

I did not say that universal truth does not exist, just that absolute certainty does not. Universal truth may exist, but we could never be absolutely certain to declare it a reality.

And no, for starters, that's a false dichotomy. Saying that it isn't "always wrong" does not mean that there is a situation where it is "good." Not all actions that are not wrong are necessarily good actions, they just aren't wrong ones.

And no, I can't provide an example of it being good because I think it is always wrong in applicable contexts. I've already stated this, this question of yours is already implicitly addressed in my previous post. My views have already been explained and account for your inquiries, but your questions have not adapted outside of their original framework.
freedomfromfallacy » I'm weighing my tears to see if the happy ones weigh the same as the sad ones.
Reply
#39
RE: Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wr...
(October 30, 2014 at 9:13 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote: You'd be surprised how "sciency" I can get I'm sure Smile

As far as "evoking emotion" I would counter with why that should intimidate? Rape is a reality. And this is to discuss the effects and ramifications of our belief system on society, how it effects our teaching, and how and what is reinforced and emphasized. Summarily it is an examination as to which train of thought is ultimately more beneficial to society.

No one said that your example was intimidating. I'm objecting that your example is emotionally charged, which heightens the possibility of sloppy answers and sloppy argumentation.

(October 30, 2014 at 9:13 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote: Also it is intended to help point out inconsistencies, and possibly even the more controversial end results of our belief systems.

It also holds the possibilities of obscuring them. A rape victim, for instance, may well have their reasoning suborned by the intense emotions brought forth by reconsidering what was obviously traumatic. Expecting the clear light of reason to shine through the fog of emotion strikes me as overly optimistic.

(October 30, 2014 at 9:13 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote: So... it seems to me that the Atheist may have to resolve what brings about a higher moral code if universal truth actually exists... If it is ALWAYS wrong to rape, then this truth is larger than the world...

What does it mean to say that the "truth is larger than the world"? Do you mean to say that the truth exists apart from the world?

The world is about twenty-seven thousand miles at the Equator. How big is this truth of yours?

I think you're making a category error with this prose here.

(October 30, 2014 at 9:13 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote: not made of matter... rape is not a chemical reaction. On the other hand, if one holds that rape is not always bad, then the Atheist is faced with the dilemma of providing an instance where it is "good".

I thought the example I provided was pretty good.

Another instance where it could be considered good is if a species which reproduces by rape is about to go extinct; rape may preserve the biodiversity of the planet.

(October 30, 2014 at 9:13 pm)Tsun Tsu Wrote: And how about child abuse?

Is it universally true that child abuse is wrong? Or are there instances where it is "good"?

I can't conceive of any instances where I'd find child abuse morally correct. But I'm not so arrogant as to think that everyone must share my views. I consider it wrong. I don't consider myself the arbiter of everyone's morality.

Reply
#40
RE: Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wr...
(October 30, 2014 at 10:30 pm)Rhythm Wrote: However, suppose we found ourselves with a situation where a culture did not develop the concept of consent? They would have no equivalence (/w our concepts) from which to even understand what we were talking about. Stranger cultural disconnects abound - though this one seems rooted in most of us. Nevertheless, in your hypothetical scenario there's one easy hypothetical example. He would still think it to be "univerally wrong", I would, perhaps you would (though I guess I shouldn't presume - care to make the case for rape friend, oh...no? ofc you don't, lol.....) but they (the ubiquitous they)...would not.

This isn't even remotely close to a deep philosophical quandry - there is no leverage. It's ridiculous bullshit we've seen on these boards a hundred times over. It's boring.

So do you think then that those who find rape acceptable and good are right? It's not wrong because they deem it acceptable to rape? Or would you say there is a higher truth that trumps their opinion, and they are still wrong whether anyone recognizes it or not? Is there a higher truth that makes rape WRONG or EVIL despite consensus or opinion? If is IS true that they are wrong and rape is wrong regardless, then we have a truth that is universal AND absolute.

(October 30, 2014 at 10:31 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: On child abuse, unless you specifically mean pedophilia, it does exist in nature among other species and isn't always immoral in the sense we see it in our society. Several animals, for example bears and snakes, might kill off weaker children so that the mother can survive and the species can progress with the strongest individuals. However in a human society, killing off a slightly deformed child will be treated as murder and highly immoral.

Lets use this example then... Can you say with conviction "pedophilia, victimizing children 6 yrs old and younger is universally wrong"? Or would you disagree with this?
Do you recall what was revealed the day the music died?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are Atheists Afraid to Join Atheists? Asmodeus 10 580 October 26, 2024 at 9:09 am
Last Post: Asmodeus
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 14191 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Family is always asking me to come to religious celebrations Tomatoshadow2 25 2731 April 11, 2023 at 6:24 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Atheists, if God doesnt exist, then explain why Keanu Reeves looks like Jesus Christ Frakki 9 1563 April 1, 2023 at 4:07 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  Moral universalism and theism Interaktive 20 2508 May 6, 2022 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Local woman says only way she has survived during COVID is faith Tomatoshadow2 41 3957 December 21, 2020 at 4:56 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  Atheists: Why did female with fat butts and short legs exist? Lambe7 14 2423 July 30, 2020 at 7:17 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Atheists: What if Trump addressed your issues in America. Would you vote for him? Sanau 38 5918 March 30, 2020 at 8:15 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
Photo Only 10% of the Nobel prize winners are atheist ? Now I am a Believer 90 9454 January 28, 2020 at 8:29 pm
Last Post: notimportant1234
  Only 10% of the Nobel prize winners are atheist ? Now I am a Believer 0 647 January 18, 2020 at 9:58 am
Last Post: Now I am a Believer



Users browsing this thread: 19 Guest(s)