Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: God: No magic required
April 5, 2014 at 11:06 am
(April 5, 2014 at 10:56 am)Thackerie Wrote: 
Too damn funny! This guy is calling people out for "vulgarity, ridicule and insult" with a short little post full of vulgarity, ridicule and insult.
Yeah, I know, this is a really old thread, but I couldn't help but make a note of this. Christian hypocrisy is comedy gold.
It's OK you're a stupid atheist you aren't meant to understand hard stuff like irony
Posts: 209
Threads: 1
Joined: June 3, 2013
Reputation:
6
RE: God: No magic required
April 5, 2014 at 11:09 am
(This post was last modified: April 5, 2014 at 11:17 am by Thackerie.)
(April 1, 2014 at 8:21 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Quote:I and literally billions of other people regularly talk to God.
Odd. My impression is that you are talking to yourself.
I talk to my cats all the time. So far, they haven't talked back.
(April 5, 2014 at 11:06 am)fr0d0 Wrote: (April 5, 2014 at 10:56 am)Thackerie Wrote: 
Too damn funny! This guy is calling people out for "vulgarity, ridicule and insult" with a short little post full of vulgarity, ridicule and insult.
Yeah, I know, this is a really old thread, but I couldn't help but make a note of this. Christian hypocrisy is comedy gold.
It's OK you're a stupid atheist you aren't meant to understand hard stuff like irony
Eh. Not sure if you're trying to be nasty or funny. So, I'll just let it go for now until I read more from you and determine what kind of person you seem to be.
Posts: 1946
Threads: 17
Joined: February 6, 2014
Reputation:
18
God: No magic required
April 5, 2014 at 11:37 am
Look at his avatar. Trollin' for Jesus, plenty of put downs and burden shifting, but no real substance or intellect.
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: God: No magic required
April 5, 2014 at 12:29 pm
(April 5, 2014 at 11:09 am)Thackerie Wrote: Eh. Not sure if you're trying to be nasty or funny. So, I'll just let it go for now until I read more from you and determine what kind of person you seem to be.
I'll try to keep to words of one syllable
Posts: 209
Threads: 1
Joined: June 3, 2013
Reputation:
6
RE: God: No magic required
April 6, 2014 at 10:20 am
(April 5, 2014 at 12:29 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: (April 5, 2014 at 11:09 am)Thackerie Wrote: Eh. Not sure if you're trying to be nasty or funny. So, I'll just let it go for now until I read more from you and determine what kind of person you seem to be.
I'll try to keep to words of one syllable 
Well, do try to make them interesting at least. Otherwise, there's no reason why I should waste my time communicating with someone who just throws out one liners in an apparent attempt to insult people or just to get some attention. Trolls are boring.
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: God: No magic required
April 6, 2014 at 2:27 pm
Will do my friend. In future please try to understand what it is you're trying to mock, just so's you don't end up making a fool of yourself again.
Posts: 209
Threads: 1
Joined: June 3, 2013
Reputation:
6
RE: God: No magic required
April 6, 2014 at 3:07 pm
(April 6, 2014 at 2:27 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Will do my friend. In future please try to understand what it is you're trying to mock, just so's you don't end up making a fool of yourself again.
As you say in your religious views,
intelligent people ignore
This is likely the last response you'll ever get from me. Treasure it always.
Or not. I don't care.
Posts: 1946
Threads: 17
Joined: February 6, 2014
Reputation:
18
God: No magic required
April 6, 2014 at 3:21 pm
(April 6, 2014 at 2:27 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Will do my friend. In future please try to understand what it is you're trying to mock, just so's you don't end up making a fool of yourself again.
Posts: 32
Threads: 1
Joined: January 16, 2014
Reputation:
2
RE: God: No magic required
November 7, 2014 at 2:53 pm
(This post was last modified: November 7, 2014 at 3:00 pm by lweisenthal.)
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: God: No magic required
November 7, 2014 at 3:16 pm
So... essentially William Lane Craig's version of the modal ontological argument, tarted up in some slightly more appealing multiverse science-words?
Sorry, but "sentience existing in another universe," no matter how powerful, does not read as any meaningful concept of god, because it contains none of the other attributes of god. What you've got there is a powerful mind, but not all powerful things are gods, and you don't even know if it's physically possible for energy to self-organize into sentience. All this is merely meaningless speculation based around defending the vaguest, blandest possible concept, before switching it out for "a god," when we both know that's an entirely different kettle of fish.
|